16 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTC440 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
New blog post: Tokenized Stock Boom: Time to Get Rich Read it here ↓ https://www.ignasdefi.com/p/tokenized-stock-boom-time-to-get
❤4
Channel
DeFi Research | Ignas
@ignasdefi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,127subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001852354196 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ignasdefi |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ignasdefi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 2,127 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 2,129 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:29 | 2,135 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 2,136 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 2,143 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 2,143 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
83 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 73.5% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 14.5% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 4.82% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 4.82% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.20% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2025 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
27 Apr 2026, 14:57 UTC779 viewsread 7 August 2026
New blog post: The DeFi Degen’s Playbook for MegaETH Ecosystem - Two Forces for Mega - Why $MEGA? - What others are saying - Apps to try out Read it here: https://www.ignasdefi.com/p/the-defi-degens-playbook-for-megaeth
24 Mar 2026, 10:30 UTC821 viewsread 7 August 2026
Polymarket's referral program is a tough one: 30% of fees generated as rewards is juicy... I want to shill it but most of my followers already use Polymarket. The real dilemma is the airdrop. Referral programs are easy to promote when you're confident they lead to an airdrop. This was my entire meta in 2023/24. But Polymarket could go the equity route. If that happens, users who traded and paid fees get nothing.…
20 Mar 2026, 14:53 UTC704 viewsread 7 August 2026
Anyone holding TRX? If, yes congratz. You are outperforming the market. But how come Tron is winning? A short blog post https://x.com/DefiIgnas/status/2035006647521677574
3 Mar 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,810 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Two protocols generate 69% of all crypto holder revenue. The rest of the “investible” market is embarrassingly small. I put together a list of 132 tokens across 12 narratives that might survive the bear market. Read it here: https://www.ignasdefi.com/p/the-investible-crypto-tokens
❤3
8 Feb 2026, 10:17 UTC878 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
I'm not trading right now. Here's what I'm doing instead: • AI vibe-exploring crypto via APIs • Checking out MegaETH ecosystem • Following & researching ICOs. Not necessarily investing! • Reading blogs instead of doom scroll on X. https://x.com/DefiIgnas/status/2020441832443011307
❤6
26 Jan 2026, 15:19 UTC894 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Current State of the Market & What's Next #8 • Developers are leaving 🙁 • Token launches... suck 🙁 • Layoffs increasing 🙁 • User activity? Increasing :))) And an airdrop shill! Read it here: https://www.ignasdefi.com/p/current-state-of-the-market-and-whats-bb3
⚡2
16 Jan 2026, 13:13 UTC851 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Crypto Truths & Lies for the Year 2026: Instead of predictions, I share my truths and lies to spot the next big crypto trends. Read it here: https://www.ignasdefi.com/p/crypto-truths-and-lies-for-the-year-647
❤2
29 Dec 2025, 09:09 UTC894 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Nansen's wallet addition is a smart move: - Track 'smart money' and trade directly within the platform. - Monitor portfolio performance It may seem like a small add-on, but similar to Farcaster's pivot from social media to a wallet-first approach, this makes Nansen a big competitor to Axiom and other trading terminals. Many underestimate Nansen as just a 'data platform,' but it's much more. I wouldn't be surprise…
❤1
13 Dec 2025, 06:30 UTC839 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Who Owns 'Aave': Aave Labs vs Aave DAO The recent Aave drama explained. https://x.com/DefiIgnas/status/1999728596626342177
❤4
21 Nov 2025, 10:10 UTC989 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Airdrop shill: Prediction markets is top sector but many are sleeping on an obvious airdrop play. Connect the dots: - Coinbase → Kalshi (KYCed, regulated & rumors of Coinbase integrating Kalshi) - Hyperliquid → Polymarket (Open, global, decentralized) - Aster → ....? Like CZ/Binance pushed Aster to answer Hyperliquid, they are now backing their own prediction market. It's Opinion. Same backers as Aster (Binan…
❤3
18 Nov 2025, 10:20 UTC687 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Seeing full capitulation on alts across CT and in my DMs. People skipped BTC early in the cycle expecting the old playbook to repeat. But new money didn’t touch the old, boring tokens. First, we got rekt on low-float, high-FDV tokens. Then on memecoins. DAT trades weren’t any better. Retail expected Saylor 2.0 companies, but instead we became exit liquidity for insiders. But as all looks lost, the altcoin playb…
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ignasdefi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeFi Research | Ignas” (@ignasdefi), 2,127 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ignasdefi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.