Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ты редактор, Гарри 🔞

Channel

Ты редактор, Гарри 🔞

@ifrita_books

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

984subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001654581388
TypeChannel
Username@ifrita_books
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ifrita_books

Growth

981984982.56 August 2026 — 981 subscribers6 August 2026 — 981 subscribers12 August 2026 — 984 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 981–984 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:32984+3
6 Aug 2026, 13:21981no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:18981first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.4%
avg views ÷ 984 subscribers
Avg views / post
535
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (16 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,282
Reactions total380
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

410 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11728.5%
🔥8119.8%
😁7518.3%
🎉6215.1%
🥰358.54%
🤣327.80%
😈40.976%
❤‍🔥30.732%
😍10.244%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 410reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC195 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Это был странный день, но весёлый 😁

🤣17😁8🔥31

3 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC308 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня первый рабочий день после отпуска... Пока немного в шоке и даже чуть-чуть забыла, как много проектов и задач, но потихоньку вольюсь 🫠

😁1812🔥6🥰1

28 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC577 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хобби, когда тебе 30+ 🤩 Отдыхаем телом и душой 🥰

🔥24🥰182

25 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC543 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @LAV_booksPhoto

🌟🌟Мы знаем, что вы этого 🌟🌟очень ждали (и мы тоже!) Мы сегодня не умрем, приходи завтра — Саммер Холланд 📀 Первая книга в новой серии «LAV. Саммер»; 📀 Твердый переплет; 📀 Карта на форзаце, схема с персонажами на нахзаце; 📀 Постер с персонажами во всем первом тираже. 1998 год Лидс, Англия Район Бистон, и без того задыхающийся от безработицы из-за закрытых фабрик, разрывают бандитские войны. Молодые парни из разных

8🔥6🥰1😈1😍1

25 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC492 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💚 2 года, десятки авторов, сотни книг, тысячи страниц, миллионы слов... Спасибо всем, кто рядом ♥️

30🎉24🔥12❤‍🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC750 views105 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

4 года муж и жена 🥰

50🎉38🥰15🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC639 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мы с менеджером международного отдела: в отпуске с 20 июля по 3 августа Также мы в 22.00: - Обложка согласована! - Спасибо! 🤪

😁37🔥134

18 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC778 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Это была тяжёлая неделя, когда я пыталась собрать в кучу проекты и мозги, поэтому я только сейчас осознала, что меня упомянули в подборке с редакторами 👀 Очень приятно 🥰

🔥1510

16 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC789 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Оля: Наташа, хватит буллить Алену! Я: да разве я ее буллю?? Тем временем наша переписка с Аленой:

🤣15😁12😈3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ifrita_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 713,031 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ты редактор, Гарри 🔞” (@ifrita_books), 984 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ifrita_books.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.