Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท๐“†ฉ ุฎู„ููŠุงุช ุชุฑูƒูŠุฉ ๐“†ช

Channel

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท๐“†ฉ ุฎู„ููŠุงุช ุชุฑูƒูŠุฉ ๐“†ช

@ieukf

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

532subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001334858496
TypeChannel
Username@ieukf
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ieukf

Growth

53153353221 August 2026 โ€” 533 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 532 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 531 subscribers8 September 2026 โ€” 532 subscribers21 August 20268 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 531โ€“533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:19532+1
30 Aug 2026, 06:19531-1
22 Aug 2026, 14:55532-1
21 Aug 2026, 17:30533first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 18 October 2024 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
10.0%
avg views รท 532 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held14 (18 October 2024 โ€“ 13 August 2026)
Views total160
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค2374.2%
๐Ÿ˜ข516.1%
๐Ÿ‘26.45%
๐Ÿ”ฅ13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2024 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC53 viewsread 21 August 2026

ุฃู…ู†ูŠ ุŒ ูˆุฃู…ุงู†ูŠ ุŒ ูˆู…ุฃู…ู†ูŠ ๐Ÿ’™

13 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC53 viewsread 21 August 2026
File

# ุนุฑูŠุงู† ุงู„ุณูŠุฏ ุฎู„ู ุงุญุณูƒ ู„ุบุฒโœจ

30 Jan 2025, 19:32 UTCโ‰ˆ1,590 viewsread 21 August 2026

ุงู„ูŠ ุนู†ุฏู‡ ุฎุจุฑุฉ ูˆูŠูƒุฏุฑ ูŠุฑุฌุนู‡ุง ุจุฃูŠ ุทุฑูŠู‚ุฉ ุงูˆ ู†ูˆุตู„ ู„ู‡ูˆูŠุฉ ุงู„ุณุงุฑู‚ ูŠุฑุงุณู„ู†ูŠ ูˆู„ุงูŠู‚ุตุฑ @Aj8t6

30 Jan 2025, 19:31 UTCโ‰ˆ1,580 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

ุชุญูŠุงุชูŠ ู„ูƒู… ุชุจู„ูŠุบ ู…ู‡ู… ุงู„ุฌู…ูŠุน ูŠู‚ุฑุฃู‡โ€ผ๏ธ

๐Ÿ‘1

30 Jan 2025, 19:30 UTCโ‰ˆ1,560 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026

ูˆู‡ุงูŠ ู‚ู†ุงุชูŠ ุงู„ุฅุญุชูŠุงุทูŠุฉ ู…ู† ูŠุญุจ ุงู„ุงุดุชุฑุงูƒ ุจูŠู‡ุง ุฎู„ูŠ ูŠู†ูˆุฑู†ูŠ ุฑุงุญ ุงุชูˆุงุฌุฏ ุจุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ุงู„ุซุงู†ูŠุฉ ุฅู† ุดุงุก ุงู„ู„ู‡

โค2

30 Jan 2025, 19:30 UTCโ‰ˆ1,530 viewsread 21 August 2026

https://youtube.com/@almuqanae8198?si=o8c4RsxMrcFrehDN

30 Jan 2025, 19:29 UTCโ‰ˆ1,420 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

ู‡ุฐุง ุฑุงุจุท ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ุงุฐุง ูƒู†ุช ู…ุดุชุฑูƒ ุฅู„ุบูŠ ุงู„ุงุดุชุฑุงูƒ ู…ู†ู‡ุง

๐Ÿ‘1

30 Jan 2025, 19:29 UTCโ‰ˆ1,280 viewsread 21 August 2026

ุงุฏุนูˆูƒู… ุฅู„ู‰ ุฅู„ุบุงุก ุงู„ุงุดุชุฑุงูƒ ู…ู† ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ

30 Jan 2025, 19:29 UTCโ‰ˆ1,250 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026

ูˆุญุณุจูŠ ุงู„ู„ู‡ ูˆู†ุนู… ุงู„ูˆูƒูŠู„ ุนู„ู‰ ู…ู† ูƒุงู† ุงู„ุณุจุจ ููŠ ุฐู„ูƒ ูˆุงู„ุญู…ุฏุงู„ู„ู‡ ุนู„ู‰ ูƒูู„ ุญุงู„

๐Ÿ˜ข2

30 Jan 2025, 19:28 UTCโ‰ˆ1,210 views5 reactionsread 21 August 2026

ุชุนุฑุถุช ู‚ู†ุงุชูŠ ุนู„ู‰ ุงู„ูŠูˆุชูŠูˆุจ ุงู„ู‰ ุงู„ุณุฑู‚ุฉ ุงู†ุง ุงู…ุงู… ุงู„ู„ู‡ ูˆุงู…ุงู…ูƒู… ุบูŠุฑ ู…ุณูˆุคู„ ุนู† ูƒู„ ุดูŠุก ูŠุชู… ู†ุดุฑู‡ ููŠู‡ุง

๐Ÿ˜ข3โค2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ieukf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ู…ููˆูŽุงุณูŽู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ุงุฉู’ ุณูŽู€ู€ู…ู’ุนูŠูŽู‘ู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ุฉ | ู‚ูู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ุฑุขู†ู โ™ฅ๏ธ
@sse5a ยท 63,020
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท๐“†ฉ ุฎู„ููŠุงุช ุชุฑูƒูŠุฉ ๐“†ชโ€ (@ieukf), 532 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ieukf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.