我寻思那些脑残是不是没有🐴? 第一 现在mtp可以正常使用 其次 我机场线路恢复你在下面评论什么? 有毛病似的 你用就好好用 跑我机场说什么?
Signed 白家贅婿 林凡
Channel
@ieplmtp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
613subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001492572810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ieplmtp |
| Created | 15 June 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ieplmtp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 613 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 614 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 614 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 15 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
我寻思那些脑残是不是没有🐴? 第一 现在mtp可以正常使用 其次 我机场线路恢复你在下面评论什么? 有毛病似的 你用就好好用 跑我机场说什么?
Signed 白家贅婿 林凡
机场推荐 #WavesLink #原后浪云 官网:dash.waveslink.org 频道:@waveslinkchannel 拥有多条跨境专线作为承载 拥有广港专线 深港专线以及公网负载均衡节点。拥有香港台湾日本美国英国总共47个节点,我们将有自研的V6奈飞解锁方案,目前在香港已经全面部署,后续会在别的地区也会尝试部署。我们面临一周年活动并且发布了促销优惠,优惠码WavesLink-1Th获得20%off,优惠会在2022/04/10过期!
Signed 白家贅婿 林凡
線路已恢復
Signed 白家贅婿 林凡
免费IEPL专线MTP代理 已恢复 吹水群 @ieplmtp1 有啥问题在这反应 有相关合作/广告/赞助/定制 联系 @zhuixu 链接方式 一键链接
Signed 港企實體機場 白家贅婿林凡
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @ieplmtp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,399,021 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“免费TG多线入口专线MTProxy代理” (@ieplmtp), 613 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ieplmtp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.