Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ja'far & Shavkatali | 9.0

Channel

Ja'far & Shavkatali | 9.0

@ieltsshares

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,376subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685654145
TypeChannel
Username@ieltsshares
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ieltsshares

Growth

4,3764,3814,378.57 August 2026 — 4,380 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,381 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,377 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,376 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,375–4,382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:544,376-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:324,377-4
7 Aug 2026, 17:034,381+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:174,380first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.0%
avg views ÷ 4,376 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (17 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total38,480
Reactions total977
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

977 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27327.9%
🔥25025.6%
custom 526742148178406975013113.4%
10610.8%
custom 5292015383643975318969.83%
🏆393.99%
custom 5445284980978621387343.48%
💯181.84%
🆒151.54%
😁151.54%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 977reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ieltsshares. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,180 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✅ Meet Ibrohim — one of my students whom I like to call a silent killer. He has always been incredibly patient, letting his results do the talking rather than his words. Just look at his Speaking score—an outstanding 8.0. I'm confident he'll go for an OSR to improve his overall band, as I genuinely believe his current result doesn't fully reflect his true potential. But for now, enjoy your well-deserved holiday, my

custom 526742148178406975024🔥12custom 5292015383643975318853custom 54452849809786213873😁2🆒2

Signed Shavkatali

3 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,340 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✅ Congrats to Mumtozmahal on turning her dream into reality! Her unwavering discipline and relentless hard work have truly paid off. That said, I genuinely believe this score doesn't fully reflect her true potential. This is only the beginning of her journey, and I'm confident she'll come back even stronger. This achievement stands as a testament to her dedication, resilience, and perseverance. Wishing her endless s

21custom 529201538364397531810🔥9custom 526742148178406975043🏆2🆒2custom 54452849809786213872

Signed Shavkatali

3 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,270 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Congratulations to Rayhona on achieving this impressive score. Were it not for her resilience and perseverance, this achievement would never have come to fruition. I know this score doesn't truly reflect her full potential, and I'm confident she'll be back to achieve an even higher band in the future. Wishing her nothing but success and the very best of luck on the journey ahead! 🆕 Want the same result? Join my

🔥158custom 529201538364397531863🆒2custom 52674214817840697502custom 54452849809786213872🏆1

Signed Shavkatali

1 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,450 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Films and computer games that contain violence are very popular. Some people believe they have a negative effect on society and should therefore be banned. Others, however, say they are harmless and help people to relax. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. In the modern world, entertainment such as video games and films is increasingly accused of normalising violence and law-breaking, and some argue that

186custom 52674214817840697506custom 52920153836439753184🔥2🏆1🆒1custom 54452849809786213871

Signed Ja'far

31 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,640 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Looks fabulous, doesn't it? 🔜

24custom 529201538364397531815🔥11custom 52674214817840697505🏆2custom 544528498097862138721

Signed Ja'far

30 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,920 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Overall, the town underwent a massive transformation, with infrastructure — including the railway and additional roads — at the center of the changes. The 2000 layout was adapted to meet modern demands, making more efficient use of space for residential construction while placing greater emphasis on improved navigation, transport variety, and schooling. Crucial amenities such as the marketplace and farmland

199custom 52674214817840697505🔥4custom 52920153836439753183🏆2🆒1custom 54452849809786213871

Signed Ja'far

28 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈2,210 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

This online group is absolutely on fire 🔥 ✔️ So far, we've covered every type of IELTS Writing Task 1 graph, and from the next lesson, we'll be tackling maps and processes ✏️ It's not too late to join—all lessons are recorded, so you can catch up anytime

26💯5🔥4custom 52920153836439753183🏆2🆒2custom 52674214817840697502custom 54452849809786213872

Signed Shavkatali

27 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC≈2,400 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

🎤Describe an interesting video you watched NOTES ⬇️ Frankly, the cue card seems a bit abstract, as there are many ways of defining “interesting.” But to me personally, I find online content centred around self-development very engaging. Today, I’d like to talk about my favourite creator on YouTube — my peer, James Scholz — who really pushed me to work harder and brought a change for the better in my life. Who h

2210custom 52674214817840697505💯3custom 54452849809786213872🔥1custom 52920153836439753181

Signed Ja'far

22 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC≈3,840 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✅ Another student of mine who absolutely crushed the IELTS test, achieving an overall Band 7.0, including an outstanding 8.5 in Listening. From day one, Amirbek has been calm, disciplined, and quietly ambitious. I always believed he had what it takes to achieve his goal, and I'm delighted to see his hard work pay off. Congratulations, Amirbek! Wishing you unending success in all your future endeavors. Stay as dilige

29🔥16custom 526742148178406975011😁3custom 529201538364397531831🏆1💯1

Signed Shavkatali

20 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC≈3,180 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

🎤Describe a book or a story with animals in it NOTES⬇️ ● Never in my life would I have thought that I’d get something like this in my speaking exam, to be honest. ● So, it was pretty hard to come up with something to talk about. ● But here’s what I got. ● I’d like to talk about this very popular Russian fairy tale called "The Wolf and the Seven Kids". And no, they’re not human kids — they’re baby goats. ● I stil

16custom 52674214817840697508🏆32🔥1😁1custom 52920153836439753181

Signed Ja'far

20 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈3,070 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

🎤Describe a boring place you visited NOTES⬇️ ● To set the record straight, I am not the type of person who likes to go out very much. I mean, in most cases, I’d rather stay in and spend some quality time with my family indoors. ● But every once in a while, I hang out with my friends from high school just to have a change of scenery. ● On one such occasion, the place they took me to was a café called "Timekeeper".

custom 526742148178406975019🔥11custom 52920153836439753185custom 544528498097862138742🏆1🆒1

Signed Ja'far

19 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC≈3,040 views220 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

✅If this post gets 200 reactions, you'll have all 50 part 2 answers by me (8.5 speaking 8 times) sent to the channe by the end of July. 🔗 A full marathon at no cost. 🏳️Do you find these recordings useful?

🔥14024custom 529201538364397531820🏆16custom 526742148178406975094custom 54452849809786213873💯2

Signed Ja'far

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ieltsshares. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 598,959 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ja'far & Shavkatali | 9.0” (@ieltsshares), 4,376 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ieltsshares.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.