Engagement
13 posts held, back to 4 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.56%
- avg views ÷ 762 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 50.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
5 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026 借用一个三甲医院医生说的话:“人只有在即将死亡的时候才能够明白这一切。人生其实就是一场骗局,最主要的任务根本不是买房买车,也不是即时行乐,这其实是欲望,不是真相。”人生就是一个梦,虚无缥缈并不真实。我们不要给自己那么多的使命感和过剩的责任感,在这个世界上,活着的我们和一只蚂蚁,一只昆虫,一只蚊子,一只甲壳虫,没有任何区别。当你走到了生命的尾声,蓦然回首,就会明白,我们追求的一切都恍若云烟,功名利禄终将变为尘土,恩怨情仇也终将随风飘散,我们在这个世 间最真实的需要,不过就是内心的感受而已。我们最根本的任务不是买房买车,不是让别人羡慕,也不是过的一定要比别人好,而是可以按照自己喜欢的方式度过一生。请记住你透支健康换来的优秀,不过是人事档案里随时可替换的几行宋体字。而单位的运转齿轮从未因此停滞半分。人生不是用红头文件丈量的,而是用看见花开、听见雨声的瞬间拼凑的。毕竟,你熬的夜、拼的命、流的泪,最后都成了档案袋里轻飘飘白A4纸,而你错过…
Signed 范小勤
25 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC76 viewsread 8 August 2026 Photo
⚡️ 24 小时机器人自助服务
🎯 租赁 / 兑换入口:
🟢 点击机器人 👉【@ShouFa】即可自助完成操作
━━━━━━━━━━━━
ℹ️ 如有任何疑问:
🟢 联系客服【@fanxiaoqin】
🟢 公告频道【首发工具箱·公告频道】
🟢 订单通知群【首发工具箱·订单通知群】
━━━━━━━━━━━━
💡 温馨提示
🟡 建议优先使用首发工具箱机器人自助操作,流程更快更稳定!
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC437 viewsread 8 August 2026 Photo
@jibo 鸡脖/瘠薄 (超级双拼中文四位用户名,简单好记,鸡巴哥同款)11888u
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC401 viewsread 8 August 2026 @zuncheng 尊称 288
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC402 viewsread 8 August 2026 @faxiaoxi 发消息 188
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC398 viewsread 8 August 2026 1
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC395 viewsread 8 August 2026 @yinhan 隐含 188
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC396 viewsread 8 August 2026 @nvfupo 女富婆 188
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC396 viewsread 8 August 2026 @fangpi 放屁 588
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC395 viewsread 8 August 2026 @erton 二筒 188
Signed 范小勤
11 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC391 viewsread 8 August 2026 @bashayu 巴沙鱼 288
Signed 范小勤
22 May 2026, 04:23 UTC440 viewsread 8 August 2026 Photo
用户名出售 联系范小勤 @fanxiaoqin
Signed 范小勤
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @idwanjia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,204,673 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“备用NFT” (@idwanjia), 762 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idwanjia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.