Guess this didn’t send 2 days ago and looks stupid now

Channel
Road to Glory
@idontknowhowtotrade_help
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002002434534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @idontknowhowtotrade_help |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/idontknowhowtotrade_help |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 15 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2025 to 7 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Cut the full position at 42 for a 230% gain, wasn’t as great as it was at height but at least learned some semblance of risk control 😂
the kid may be retarded but he knows $hype chart well.
Photo, posted without a caption
Just figured my new strategy out^
Photo, posted without a caption
Haven’t been trading much but saw $hype with a major dip and took a shot, 270% and counting
FW: Thought this stat was interesting = every time Fed has cut when mkts within 1% of highs = SP500 was higher 1 yr later
Happy with my patience, really happy actually. Stuck unwaveringly to my thesis and sold $1 from $hype top. Likely going to buy back later tonight or early tomorrow morning depending on buy pressure—- that said September lows are indeed here…
Forgot about this but ig now paying off: Micheal Burry has a 98 million dollar short position on NVDA 😭😭😭 bears never change man
$hype to 50, I am wrong 😭😭😭
Per what I said yesterday I just fully closed my $hype position (+278%). Does that mean I'm not going to buy back very soon? No, not at all. I think that $hype will tumble again from highs to around $40-43 where I will buy it back. That said, I think that this is a decently risky play because this is now the second time $hype has flirted with breaking $50. My thesis is that on this presumed 3rd tumble we see $hype br…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @idontknowhowtotrade_help. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Road to Glory” (@idontknowhowtotrade_help), 15 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idontknowhowtotrade_help.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.