Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shower thoughts

Channel

Shower thoughts

@idkShowerThoughts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003826780373
TypeChannel
Username@idkShowerThoughts
Descriptionگفتم شاید بهتر باشه همه افکارم و تحلیل‌ها و دانسته‌هامو یک جایی بنویسم؛ پس اینجا وجود داره. ناشناس: https://t.me/HarfChatBot?start=05d11430967f
Created29 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded15 October 2026
Last confirmed live15 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/idkShowerThoughts

Growth

3215 Oct 2026, 22:47 — 32 subscribers15 Oct 2026, 23:22 — 32 subscribers15 Oct 2026, 22:4715 Oct 2026, 23:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Oct 2026, 23:2232no change
15 Oct 2026, 22:4732first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.9%
avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held9 (29 June 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total23
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3583.3%
🍓37.14%
🕊24.76%
🤨12.38%
🥰12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 11:33 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 15 October 2026

راجع به روز دختر می‌خواهم بنویسم.

🤨1🥰1

5 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC273 views11 reactionsread 15 October 2026

خب ما می‌تونیم به جای تغییر خلاقیت، تریبون رو تغییر بدیم. مثلا به جای اینکه ریلز و پست‌های کوتاه و پرسر و صدا با انواع قلاب‌ها و روش‌های جلب توجه در الگوریتم بهتر عمل کنند، شاید بهتر باشه به عمق محتوا توجه بشه و کیفیت اون باعث دیده شدن بیشترش در یک پلتفرم بشه. البته در برخی پلتفرم‌ها مثل پلتفرم‌های پادکست‌ها یا ویدئوهای طولانی هنوز تا حدی اصالت و عمق حفظ شده، اما چنین محتواهایی معمولاً به حاشیه رانده می‌شند و بیشتر ف…

❤11

5 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC217 views6 reactionsread 15 October 2026

مثلا بیاید دقت کنیم به کلمه‌های "کرینج" یا "پوزر". به کسانی که محتوای ترند یا معروف رو دوست دارند می‌گند پوزر، کرینج، کلیشه‌ای، سطحی، بی‌سلیقه و...؛ اما دقیقاً خود همین فرهنگ هم تبدیل به یه کلیشه شده. هر کسی رو که ببینی، داره درباره اینکه چقدر همه کلیشه‌ای، پوزر و تکراری هستند حرف می‌زنه. در جوامع راک و متال، افرادی که دیگران رو پوزر صدا می‌کنند، از افرادی که واقعا پوزرند بیشترند گاها! در خیلی از جوامع دیگر هم، افراد…

❤6

5 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC106 views8 reactionsread 15 October 2026

اینکه "هر چیز کمیاب و متفاوت = باارزش" یک قانون منطقی و طبیعی نیست قاعدتاً؛ اما یک Heuristic هستش. Heuristic یا به اصطلاح "میان‌بر ذهنی"، یک اصطلاح در روان‌شناسیه که به زبان ساده به حالتی اشاره داره که مغز، به‌جای تحلیل دقیق و کامل همه اطلاعات، از یک میان‌بر ساده برای تصمیم‌گیری سریع استفاده می‌کنه. معمولاً چیزهای کمیاب ارزشمندند، اما همیشه نه. مثلاً الماس از فیروزه ارزشمندتره، اما یک کیف خیلی عادی و گاهی حتی زشت از …

❤8

5 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 15 October 2026

وقتی ضدکلیشه، کلیشه می‌شود؟ اگر دقت کنید، انسان معمولاً دچار یک تناقضه. هم‌زمان میل شدیدی به متفاوت بودن و میل شدیدی به همرنگ شدن داره؛ که هر دوی این‌ها از لحاظ تکاملی قابل بررسی‌اند. خب، اول از همه راجع به تکامل، که موضوع بسیار جالب و مفصلیه و احتمالاً زیاد بهش اشاره کنم (چون طبیعتاً خیلی راجع بهش می‌خونم و خیلی هم روی همه‌چیز تأثیر داره). اگر کمی مطالعه در زمینه‌ تکامل و تاریخ زیستن موجودات داشته باشید، می‌دونید ک…

❤6🍓1

2 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC153 views7 reactionsread 15 October 2026

درود بر همگی. من این چنل رو ساختم که حرف‌هامو بنویسم. چون معمولا حرف‌های زیادی توی زمینه‌های خیلی زیادی دارم که معمولا به افراد محدود از جمله تراپیست و دوست نزدیک و شامپوی حمام می‌زنم:) پس گفتم چرا حداقل یه جا ثبتشون نکنم. تراپیستم بهم گفت که "تو اگر ننویسی مدیون خودت می‌شی" و دوستم هم گفت "کاش می‌نوشتی حرفاتو و پابلیک می‌ذاشتی" و این شد که من تصمیم گرفتم بنویسم. اولش گفتم فقط در حوزه‌های علمی/اجتماعی بنویسم اما بعدش…

❤4🕊2🍓1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @idkShowerThoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shower thoughts” (@idkShowerThoughts), 32 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idkShowerThoughts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.