Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 全新起航 - 强哥用户名销售

Channel

全新起航 - 强哥用户名销售

@idhaoye

5 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

27subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001501389574
TypeChannel
Usernames@banyun @baota @chaojiqian @idhaoye @paotui
Created26 July 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/idhaoye

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2731297 August 2026 — 31 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30 subscribers9 September 2026 — 29 subscribers9 September 2026 — 29 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29 subscribers8 October 2026 — 27 subscribers11 October 2026 — 27 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 65 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 08:5427no change
8 Oct 2026, 22:5927-2
14 Sept 2026, 00:3929no change
10 Sept 2026, 09:5929no change
10 Sept 2026, 00:5729no change
9 Sept 2026, 10:0029no change
9 Sept 2026, 02:3629-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:2730no change
25 Aug 2026, 11:0830no change
25 Aug 2026, 02:4330no change
25 Aug 2026, 02:2530no change
21 Aug 2026, 23:5730-1
11 Aug 2026, 03:1531no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:1531no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:4031first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 26 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍738.9%
❤633.3%
🤮527.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2022 to 13 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Apr 2024, 13:48 UTC≈7,980 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

老板已出定金,不卖其他人了,还在犹豫?

👍2

11 Mar 2024, 08:00 UTC≈8,000 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

不报ton价 报U价大哥们 收NTF词,+888 手机号 自报价格 ✅ @idhao

👍1

7 Mar 2024, 11:04 UTC≈6,470 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

✅在售列表 🔵以下按价格排序 @jishu 技术 188888💰 @waiwei 外围 188888💰 @shentou 渗透 88888💰 @chaojiqian 超级签 88888💰 @lieqi 猎奇 88888💰 @jiefeng 解封 28888💰 @jipiao 机票 28888💰 @kuaidi 快递 28888💰 @xianlu 线路 9999💰 @paotui 跑腿 9999💰…

🤮5👍4❤2

4 Feb 2024, 19:25 UTC≈4,730 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

回家过年了 近期不回复 ✅@qianggege888 @idhao

❤1

31 Dec 2023, 23:16 UTC≈4,400 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

✅元旦快乐 ,今天打骨折 ✅ 新的一年强哥更换新号 新ID: @qianggege888 @idhao ✅元旦快乐 ,今天打骨折 ✅

❤2

8 Dec 2023, 00:11 UTC≈3,750 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

✅ 技术类型推荐 ton不稳定 价格只报U @jishu 技术 188888💰 @shentou 渗透 88888💰 @chaojiqian 超级签 88888💰 @daishiming 代实名 6666💰 @baota 宝塔 6666💰

❤1

26 Oct 2023, 17:31 UTC≈3,240 viewsread 11 August 2026

限时打骨折,过时原价 @lieqi 猎奇 88888💰 38888💰 骨折不卖了

22 Aug 2023, 16:45 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 11 August 2026

ton价太低,以后只报U价 ✅@qianggege888 @idhao

20 Aug 2023, 21:18 UTC≈2,880 viewsread 11 August 2026

麻蛋 超级搜索好像跑路了 我里面还有500U 已确认跑路

18 Apr 2023, 18:38 UTC≈2,330 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

此频道更换为NTF 售卖频道 电报用户名说明: 举例: ✅在电报上,我有一个【A账号】,通过【公开频道】注册了【用户名1】 这个【用户名1】就只能固定在【A账号】上的一个【公开频道】上,【不能移动】。假如【A账号】被封了,那么【用户名1】就跟着消失了。 这就是【基础用户名】 ———————————————— ✅TG官方推出了【永恒用户名】也叫【NFT】 可以挂在【任意账号】上的【任意群聊、频道、个人资料】上,【随时任意移动】。假如【A账号】被封了,那么【永恒用户名】依然在你的钱包里。 🔴NFT最低都需要40U ✅ 如何获得【永恒用户名】教程 ✅认准强哥id:@idhao 强哥原id不使用了 ✅@qianggege888 @idhao ———————————————— 最新列表 https://t.me/c/1501389574/1260

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @idhaoye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全新起航 - 强哥用户名销售” (@idhaoye), 27 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idhaoye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.