Posted without readable text
❤6👍3🔥2

Channel
@idenglish_online
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Cite this entry
35,103subscribers
-308 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001218676468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @idenglish_online |
| Description | Подписаны 7 ваших друзей. Регистрационный номер РКН: 5213955434 3 дня практики 👉 https://online.idenglish.online/intensiv_new?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=profile 🗣Английский из реальной жизни. Без зубрежки, всего по 20 минут в день, даже если не полу |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/idenglish_online |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 35,103 | -19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 35,122 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 35,136 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 35,143 | -33 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 35,176 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 35,190 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 35,205 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:54 | 35,210 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 35,218 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 35,242 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 35,263 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 35,260 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 35,278 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 35,280 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 35,287 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 35,288 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 35,308 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 35,310 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 35,317 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 35,323 | first reading |
118 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (27 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 54,532 |
| Reactions total | 779 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 03:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,642 reactions across 109 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 684 | 41.7% | |
| 🔥 | 416 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 374 | 22.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 60 | 3.65% | |
| 😁 | 33 | 2.01% | |
| 🎉 | 19 | 1.16% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 1.16% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.426% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.426% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 0.365% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.365% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.244% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.183% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.183% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.061% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @idenglish_online. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 118 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
❤6👍3🔥2
🇺🇸 Слово, которое прямо сейчас на слуху в американских соцсетях: whimsical ✨ Это что-то очаровательное, необычное, сказочное, с особой атмосферой. От него же пошёл тренд 🤍whimsy maxing 🤍– когда любимые вещи буквально «обрастают» множеством милых и необычных деталей, страз, бантиков и тп. ☕️ This little cafe is so whimsical! «Эта кафешка такая волшебная и завораживающая!» Встречали это слово в англо-язычных рилсах
❤12🔥8⚡5🤩2😁1
📎 Неочевидные фразы на английском, которые помогут вам понять носителей. Вот есть что-то довольно банальное типа face like thunder или lightning-fast – даже дословный перевод помогает понять смысл. А есть что-то такое, до чего в жизни бы никогда не додумался. Например: 🔹 Gravy train – легкие деньги, выгодное дельце. 🔹 Hot potato – актуальная, горячая тема. 🔹 Nest egg – заначка. 🔹 Eager beaver – трудяга. 🔹 Top …
👍16🔥7❤3
🤯 6 способов сказать «Я в шоке!» как настоящий носитель Знакомо: услышали шокирующую новость, а кроме “Oh my God” или “Really?” в голову ничего не приходит. А у носителей для этого целый арсенал крутых выражений! Хотите звучать естественно в любой ситуации? Ловите подборку 👇 1️⃣ No way! - Не может быть! / Да ладно! ➤ Классика жанра. Универсально, эмоционально, подходит для любого контекста. ▶ “You’re getting marri…
👍11❤6🔥4😁1
Правильный ответ – to start from scratch. Слово scratch [skrætʃ] буквально означает «царапина» или «черта, линия, сделанная на поверхности». А выражение from scratch – «с самого начала, с чистого листа, с нуля, без готовой основы». Например: After moving to a new city, I decided to start from scratch and build my life the way I wanted. – После переезда в новый город я решил(а) начать всё с чистого листа и построит…
❤5🔥4❤🔥2👍1
Голосуйте, а я позже пришлю верный ответ с разбором🙌
Posted without readable text
❤4🔥3
Sure [ʃʊə] – это слово носители языка используют постоянно. Но знали ли вы, что у него несколько значений? ▪️Sure, no problem! – Конечно, без проблем! В этом контексте «sure» будет сигнализировать о вашем согласии и переводиться на русский язык «да, конечно». ▪️I'm sure! — Я уверен! А вот тут уже другое значение. При помощи такой фразы вы выражаете свою 100% уверенность. ▪️Sure sure. – Да-да. Такую реплику можн…
❤10👍5🔥5
Что она говорит? She likes being visited by her friends. – Она любит, когда к ней приходят друзья. Поняли - ставьте 👍, не поняли -🔥 __________ 🔥Приглашаем вас на бесплатный практикум «Английский на автомате». Там мы создаем ситуации, где вы естественно и без заучивания начинаете использовать живую речь, встраивая при этом грамматику, не задумываясь: 👉🏻 Отрабатываем современные конструкции в диалогах-симуляциях …
👍11❤5🔥1
О чем идет речь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
File, posted without a caption
Что он говорит? Counting cash helps me calm down. – Подсчитывание денег успокаивает меня. Поняли - ставьте 👍, не поняли -🔥
👍17❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @idenglish_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@idenglish_online edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О чем идет речь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
О чем идет речь?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
О чем идет речь?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вопрос 6 (бонусный, сложный). Вы в ресторане. Официант спрашивает: Would you like me to wrap this up? Что он предлагает?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вопрос 5. Вы сдаёте багаж в аэропорту. Сотрудник говорит: Please drop off your luggage here. Что значит drop off?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вопрос 4. Вы в отеле. Утром выходите из номера. На двери табличка: Check out before 12 PM. Что нужно сделать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заговори легко. ID English - школа английского” (@idenglish_online), 35,103 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idenglish_online.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.