Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᅠ ່

Channel

ᅠ ່

@id8103909933

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002567970244
TypeChannel
Username@id8103909933
Created3 April 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/id8103909933

Growth

1615 Aug 2026, 10:18 — 16 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 10:30 — 16 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 10:1815 Aug 2026, 10:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15–17 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:3016no change
15 Aug 2026, 10:1816first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

806 reactions across 6 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542031141259970432111814.6%
custom 52335312649459067298110.0%
custom 5420281807390130783809.93%
custom 5262789634433248689688.44%
custom 5348565160741068776647.94%
custom 5231265785661383261587.20%
custom 5258076062444710843546.70%
👀516.33%
custom 5474380682874619144455.58%
🕊334.09%
👻293.60%
custom 5226664230714896520212.61%
🤷192.36%
custom 5222105170174835917172.11%
custom 5420141555233071341161.99%
custom 5212980044003038757131.61%
custom 5444936160914730638111.36%
custom 523339176440813378280.993%
custom 527838135785517444460.744%
custom 538455987289955584550.62%
3 further kinds91.12%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 806reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2025 to 24 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 7 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @id8103909933. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 April 2025 to 24 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 May 2026, 19:54 UTC149 views25 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52129800440030387578custom 54408591717989404695custom 54449361609147306384custom 52312657856613832612custom 52335312649459067292custom 54427248282829099132custom 54743806828746191442

Signed Барыга

28 Mar 2026, 19:58 UTC514 views56 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 542014155523307134116custom 547438068287461914414custom 523353126494590672912custom 52129800440030387575custom 54449361609147306385custom 52266642307148965204

Signed Барыга

18 Nov 2025, 08:01 UTC≈1,370 views109 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026

Бурмалда

custom 523353126494590672932custom 523126578566138326125custom 542031141259970432120custom 52333917644081337828custom 54743806828746191447custom 52221051701748359176custom 52783813578551744446custom 53845598728995558455

14 Sept 2025, 17:21 UTC≈14,400 views139 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026

😽😽😽😽 😽😽😽😽 😽😽😽😽

custom 534856516074106877642🕊22custom 523126578566138326118custom 542031141259970432112custom 522210517017483591711👻10custom 523353126494590672910custom 547438068287461914410

28 Jun 2025, 09:09 UTC≈15,500 views211 reactions6 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 526278963443324868956custom 525807606244471084342custom 542031141259970432136custom 523126578566138326113custom 547438068287461914412custom 523353126494590672911custom 542028180739013078310👀8

13 Jun 2025, 18:57 UTC≈14,900 views266 reactions18 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⭐You might as well Just come around

custom 542028180739013078370custom 542031141259970432150👀43custom 522666423071489652017custom 523353126494590672914custom 534856516074106877614👻12custom 525807606244471084312

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @id8103909933. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 880,664 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᅠ ່” (@id8103909933), 16 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/id8103909933.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.