Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚事件大爆料®

Channel

东南亚事件大爆料®

@id222o

3 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

94,251subscribers

+45,773 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003433231739
TypeChannel
Usernames@id222o @ID555o @nnfcai
Description#东南亚 #柬埔寨 #老挝 #缅甸 #泰国 #新闻 『放眼东南亚-聚焦大事件』 东南亚事件大爆料®: 专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事;避免政治敏感话题 📩免费投稿: @nnniu 💼商务合作: @nnniu 🔥吹水聊天 @AWM888Q 🍉吃瓜频道 @BIS666 ✨头像素材 @niuiuiuiuiu 🌸文案频道 @CNN0999 🚀联盟导航 @BSYYYL 本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held188
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/id222o

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@id222o/2650 · this entry6 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC@BIS666/66726 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@id222o/3917 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 23:00 UTC@BIS666/98555 Oct 2026, 04:40 UTC1.0012 days
@id222o/5306 · this entry8 Oct 2026, 07:50 UTC@BIS666/100678 Oct 2026, 20:15 UTC1.0012 hours
@BIS666/1113114 Oct 2026, 02:28 UTC@id222o/5687 · this entry14 Oct 2026, 03:53 UTC1.0085 minutes
@BIS666/1433324 Oct 2026, 06:33 UTC@id222o/6523 · this entry24 Oct 2026, 07:58 UTC1.0085 minutes
@BIS666/1443025 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC@id222o/6651 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 23:59 UTC1.0017 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@BIS6667 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.7 hours@BIS666 (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,834 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

48,478124,29486,38694,2517 August 202613 November 2026
188 measurements spanning 97 days, net +45,773. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,106–135,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 188
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 00:4594,251-501
12 Nov 2026, 08:4894,752-35
12 Nov 2026, 08:0994,787-2,210
10 Nov 2026, 18:4996,997-265
10 Nov 2026, 09:3897,262-86
10 Nov 2026, 08:0997,348-1,753
9 Nov 2026, 04:1799,101-424
8 Nov 2026, 19:4199,525-180
8 Nov 2026, 17:0899,705-1,016
8 Nov 2026, 00:19100,721-460
7 Nov 2026, 10:39101,181-205
7 Nov 2026, 08:08101,386-751
6 Nov 2026, 22:46102,137-670
6 Nov 2026, 08:17102,807no change
6 Nov 2026, 08:11102,807-394
5 Nov 2026, 23:46103,201-561
5 Nov 2026, 09:56103,762-113
5 Nov 2026, 08:29103,875-638
5 Nov 2026, 00:06104,513-412
4 Nov 2026, 08:06104,925first reading

Engagement

1,975 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 243 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.04%
avg views ÷ 94,251 subscribers
Avg views / post
981
525 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
525
of 1,975 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 199 of 525 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held1,975 (7 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total514,781
Reactions total9,569
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,410
Videos
≈1,120
Links
≈2,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 29m
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 255 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17,355 reactions across 346 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,48414.3%
👍2,48214.3%
🎉2,47814.3%
🥰2,43514.0%
👏2,39613.8%
🔥2,35713.6%
😁2,31613.3%
❤‍🔥1090.628%
😍1070.617%
🤩940.542%
💯920.53%
🤣20.012%
👎10.006%
😢10.006%
🤔10.006%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 351 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 September 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 525 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,350 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 💎 来了U18 · 今天你要发 💎 💎 视讯 — 索莱尔/DB/CQ9高限红 💎 电子 — PG/PP/CQ9 一注2000 💎 彩票 — 独家PC综艺/哈希游戏 💎 捕鱼 — 炫酷炮台激情连射爆奖 💎 棋牌 — 经典对局博弈高手云集 💎 体育 — 皇冠体育全球赛季覆盖 🫥ok游戏中心 👉 上押150万U 😘 新币担保 👉 上押100万U 😃 USDT OKPAY FLLQB上下分 😃 加入U18、迎接你的暴富神话! 🫥 官方网址: U18.com 🫥 官方小程序: @UU18 🫥 官方唯一客服: @U18C 🫥 官方唯一频道: @U18A

👏13🔥11❤7🎉6😁6👍5🥰4

13 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,370 views53 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#币圈消息:11月13日比特币跌破70000美元,日内跌超2%。 前几天还突破8w了,现在直接跌破7w。终究还是🈹了 😀东南亚事件大爆料 @ID555o 😀东南亚吃瓜社 @BIS666 😎AWM交流群 @AWM888Q ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅投稿澄清爆料: @nnniu

👍12🥰11🎉10👏8😁6🔥4❤2

13 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,310 views59 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:昨晚晚上10点后先是大批警察集结吉隆坡总部听训话,然后又分散到全城。 最近恶性事件挺多的,再加上袭警事件影响。接下来查的会非常非常严。都注意一点吧,证件一定要合法合规。 😀东南亚事件大爆料 @ID555o 😀东南亚吃瓜社 @BIS666 😎AWM交流群 @AWM888Q ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅投稿澄清爆料: @nnniu

🥰13❤9😁9🎉8👏8🔥7👍5

13 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,370 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🎮 主营项目:😀😀|😀😀|😌😳|😀😀|😀😀 😄 全程透明,无任何私彩黑幕 😀 长期亿🔤储备,资金秒提秒到 😃顶尖技术团队😃😃😃护航 🔥 UU8 首存包赔福利来啦! 💰 首存100U–1000U 🎁 最高100%本金包赔 🎮 电子、捕鱼指定游戏 💎 包赔金额8倍流水即可提现 ⚡️ 新用户首充专享,符合条件即可参与!可与首存活动共享。 🔤🔤8️⃣目前有长期福利 🎁 日彩金+免费签到+周礼金+VIP月福利 💰 每日充值达标可申请日彩金 🎯 下周剩余周一、三、五可参与签到 🎉 每周充值达标,还能领取额外周礼金! 😳首充即送2️⃣8️⃣🔤彩金 😳 每日充值奖励:单日最高返1️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤! 😳 电子幸运注单:最高送出2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤! 😳 VIP尊享回馈:每周流水返奖高达2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤! 😳 体育串关豪礼:串得多赢得多,彩金最高可达8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤! 😀😀😀…

❤11👍10🔥8🎉7😁6👏5🥰5

13 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,350 views55 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:雪兰莪警方捣毁两个网络诈骗集团,11人被捕,涉爱情及投资诈骗 11月13日报道,马来西亚雪兰莪州警方近日展开两次突击行动,成功捣毁两个涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的犯罪集团,共逮捕11名嫌疑人。 据警方通报,两次行动分别于11月3日及11月10日进行,地点涉及雪兰莪州加影(Sungai Long)及巴生(Taman Aman Perdana)。落网的11名嫌疑人包括1名马来西亚籍男子、7名外籍男子及3名外籍女子,年龄介于22岁至45岁之间。 初步调查显示,这两个犯罪集团涉嫌从事爱情诈骗及虚假投资诈骗活动,主要将海外人士作为目标,通过网络联络受害者实施诈骗。 警方在行动中查获14部手机、6台笔记本电脑、3本笔记本、2台路由器、一体式电脑及iPad等设备,所有查获物品估值约2万令吉。 案件后续方面,部分嫌疑人已被提控,其中两名外籍嫌疑人于11月6日依据《刑事法典》第120B(2)条被起诉,并分别被判罚款2000令吉…

🔥10🥰9👏8❤7👍6🎉4😁4😍3

13 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,310 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

凌晨突袭!吉隆坡蕉赖 Ocean KTV 遭警方扫荡,一批女子当场被带走! 2026年11月13日凌晨约1时,马来西亚吉隆坡蕉赖(Cheras)Ocean KTV 突遭执法人员上门检查,现场展开突击扫荡行动。 据现场消息,一批正在场所内的女子被执法人员带走,并被带回警局接受进一步调查。 深夜娱乐场所突然迎来执法检查,现场情况引发关注。 ⚠️ 凌晨突击行动再次敲响警钟!目前被带走人员的身份、人数及具体涉案原因尚未得到官方证实,后续情况有待警方进一步公布。 😀东南亚事件大爆料 @ID555o 😀东南亚吃瓜社 @BIS666 😎AWM交流群 @AWM888Q ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅投稿澄清爆料: @nnniu

😁13🔥12🥰7❤6🎉6👏5👍2

13 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,350 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:雪兰莪警方捣毁3个诈骗集团,61人被捕,包括45名印尼籍人员 马来西亚雪兰莪州警方于11月3日在 Seri Kembangan 展开突击行动,成功捣毁3个涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的犯罪集团,共逮捕61名嫌疑人,其中包括15名马来西亚籍、45名印尼籍及1名中国籍人员。 警方此次行动突击了当地3处住宅,初步调查发现,其中两个犯罪集团通过发布虚假兼职广告招募受害者,以点赞、分享等简单网络任务为诱饵,诱骗受害者参与所谓的兼职工作,随后要求受害者向指定银行账户转账,实施诈骗。 另一个犯罪集团则涉嫌冒充马来西亚通讯及多媒体委员会(MCMC)官员,通过电话联系民众,利用虚假身份实施电话诈骗。 行动期间,警方共查获144件电子设备及相关物品,估计总价值约8万令吉。 警方目前援引刑事法典第420条(诈骗)及第120B条(刑事串谋)展开调查,并将进一步追查相关犯罪集团的运作情况及其他涉案人员。 😀东南亚事件大爆料 @ID55…

🥰4👍3👏3😁3❤2🎉1🔥1

13 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,300 views31 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#突发事件:微软邮箱 Outlook崩溃了 技术故障通知——全球 Microsoft 365 服务中断 目前,Microsoft 正在经历全球性服务中断,影响 Outlook 和 Microsoft Teams 的正常运行。因此,部分用户可能会遇到无法正常访问 Outlook 和 Microsoft Teams 服务的情况。 我们正在持续监控该问题,并将在获取更多信息后及时向大家通报最新进展。 😀东南亚事件大爆料 @ID555o 😀东南亚吃瓜社 @BIS666 😎AWM交流群 @AWM888Q ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅投稿澄清爆料: @nnniu

🥰7🔥6❤5👏5👍4🎉2😁2

13 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,390 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

马达加斯加马任加市QNET诈骗案持续发酵,新增4人被捕,累计16人遭拘留调查 马达加斯加马任加市(Mahajanga)一起涉及QNET Infinity的涉嫌诈骗案件持续发酵。当地警方近日在Tsaramandroso Ambony地区展开后续调查行动,再逮捕4名男性嫌疑人。目前,该案累计已有16人被拘留调查。 据调查,涉案人员涉嫌利用虚假就业机会及高薪承诺诱骗求职者加入组织,向受害者声称每月最高可获得120万阿里亚里(马达加斯加货币)的工资,但要求每人提前缴纳325万阿里亚里的费用,并鼓励参与者继续招募亲友加入。 目前,已有7名受害者向国家宪兵队刑事调查部门报案。受害者表示,他们每人支付了325万阿里亚里,但缴费超过3个月后,仍未获得承诺的工作及报酬。 警方随后对案件展开调查,并于11月8日逮捕4名男性嫌疑人。新增被捕人员已被移交司法程序,并被下令羁押。 截至目前,该案累计已有16人被拘留调查。案件仍在进一步调查中,相…

🔥10😁10❤9👍8👏6🥰5🎉3

13 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,380 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

美国新任驻柬大使拜访洪森 11月13日上午,柬埔寨参议院主席洪森在金边参议院团结宫,会见美国新任驻柬埔寨大使克里斯托弗·约翰·安德森(Christopher Jon Anderson)。 据报道,双方举行了礼节性会见并进行工作交流。这是安德森以美国新任驻柬大使身份开展的外交活动之一。 😀东南亚事件大爆料 @ID555o 😀东南亚吃瓜社 @BIS666 😎AWM交流群 @AWM888Q ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅投稿澄清爆料: @nnniu

🔥12😁9👏8🥰8🎉6❤4👍4

13 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,410 views60 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

😎【😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎】 💎東南亞顶尖USDT娱乐城💎 ❤️❤️|❤️❤️|❤️❤️|❤️❤️|❤️❤️|❤️❤️ 💵七星娱乐·八方来财💵 🏆综合娱乐新体验🏆 🎮高端玩家聚集地🎮 💎1亿uji储备金·实力护航 💎大额玩家最怕的从来不是输赢 💎而是赢了之后平台扛不住 💎在七星娱乐,您从来不需要考虑资金的问题! 🔥信誉至上,心系用户,用心铸就品牌的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平、公开、公正、透明真实的高品质娱乐平台 👍TG小程序,直达官网:注册点击,一键登录,方便快捷,免实名零等待 😎🤩🤩🤩🤩@qiqi911024 😎🤩🤩🤩🤩@QXYLPD88 😎❤️❤️❤️❤️@qxylcw 😎❤️❤️❤️❤️@qxylkf88

👍14🥰10👏8❤7🎉7🔥7😁7

13 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,380 views54 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:彭亨州18间度假木屋沦为诈骗窝点,警方逮捕14人,包括12名台湾籍男子 11月13日报道,马来西亚警方近日在彭亨州文冬(Bentong)展开突击行动,捣毁一个涉嫌冒充台湾警方实施电话诈骗的犯罪集团。警方调查发现,该集团租用当地18间度假木屋作为诈骗据点,最终逮捕14名男子,其中包括12名台湾籍及2名马来西亚籍人员。 据报道,警方于11月5日至6日期间展开相关执法行动,调查发现,涉案集团租下18间度假木屋,租期约两个月,并将这些场所改造成电话诈骗中心,涉嫌冒充台湾警方身份,通过电话联系受害者实施诈骗。 行动期间,警方共查获2台笔记本电脑、15台平板电脑、69部手机及70张SIM卡,另外还起获印有台湾警方标志的制服、背心及帽子等物品,怀疑有关装备被用于冒充执法人员,增加诈骗活动的可信度。 目前,警方正进一步分析查获的电子设备及通讯记录,以厘清14名嫌疑人在诈骗集团中的具体分工,并追查案件是否涉及其他成员及跨境…

🥰10❤9🎉9😁9👏6🔥6👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,975 posts we hold for @id222o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 60 posts on @id222o as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
42

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚事件大爆料®” (@id222o), 94,251 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/id222o.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.