Channel
@icute6
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,382subscribers
+118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003793844163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @icute6 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/icute6 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
3,940 average views per post against 3,382 subscribers — an engagement rate of 116.4%. Across the 2,355 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,990 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 2.67% and 19.2%, with a median of 8.16%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (2 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 78,723 |
| Mature posts only | 122.0% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 3,382 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:zho · 2,355 channels · p10 0.77% · p25 2.67% · p50 8.16% · p75 19.2% · p90 38.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.150th percentile · 14.3× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.087% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 3,382 | +104 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 3,278 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 3,264 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 3,264 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 78,723 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 90.0% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀 野寻上海互推抽奖活动第三期已圆满结束 😀 😀 恭喜所有获奖的小伙伴，奖金已全部发放，获奖名单和领奖截图都已公开，感谢大家的支持！❤️ 😀 第四期8月7日晚22：00开奖 快快参与起来吧！ 😀 报名人数越多，奖金池越高！ 😀 不看邀请人数 😀 报名即可参与抽奖 😀 最高可得 2️⃣3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣元现金红包！ 活动方案 : https://t.me/chasesh_xlb/988 上海交流 : https://t.me/chasesh_jlq 上海报名 : 野寻·星野 @chase_yx 双向联系 @chase_yx_bot
Signed 小石榴💦
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 小石榴💦
🐇元气少女福利姬色色聊天群 https://t.me/+HyYiWRNvx0FhMzll 🐇元气少女备用福利群 https://t.me/+bmWMkPmyVUc5MGMx 💕元气少女福利姬认证榜单 https://t.me/yqsnbd
❤1
Signed 小石榴💦
小狗 自己过来 :-P
❤1
Signed 小石榴💦
Video, posted without a caption
Signed 小石榴💦
想要依偎在你身旁( ; _ ; )/~~~
❤4
Signed 小石榴💦
快来找我买原味(>^ω^<)
Signed 小石榴💦
找不同(o^^o)/25年的图
❤1
Signed 小石榴💦
暗恋我的赶紧跟我表白啊 还想不想让我发八月和你了？8月七夕节想一个人过是吧？
Signed 小石榴💦
我喜欢坏坏的女友 我喜欢刺激的感受
Signed 小石榴💦
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Signed 小石榴💦
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
Signed 小石榴💦
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @icute6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小石榴她湿透了” (@icute6), 3,382 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icute6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.