For more details please see this video
Channel
ICU DATA
@icudata
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,071subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001243639219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @icudata |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/icudata |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 2,071 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 2,070 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 02s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 57.7% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 42.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2023 to 3 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtu.be/Xxdedx1HtHo?si=iSj6yyJ7hU8ofhEF
❤1
As a pathological result: This a patient with pleural effusion, you can see that the parietal and visceral pleura away from each others with the gap in between full of fluids.
❤1👍1
How could you see Pneumothorax with ultrasound ? You can use linear ultrasound probe in midclavicular line with marker directed towards patient head (long axis view) or (short axis view) with marker directed towards shoulder. As you see, this is parietal and visceral pleura sliding toward each others with shadows coming through know as comets tails. This is the normal finding of the pleura. You can see it clearer wit…
Ecg of a young patient with extensive pulmonary embolism Its a rare sign to see ( S1Q3T3) : Prominent S wave in lead I. Large Q wave in lead III. T wave inversion or flat T wave in lead III.
👍9❤3
This is how massive pulmonary embolism shows in Echo: • RV wall hypokinesis • RV dilatation
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
Tension pneumothorax established. Firstly a wide bore cannula was placed in second intercostal space midclavicular line. Then a thoracic drainage was inserted, the lung is re-inflated. In case of COPD exacerbation please think about tension pneumothorax
❤1
50 year old patient with COPD exacerbation. Suddenly he had developed tachypnea and tachycardia up to 160/min SR with saturation drop to 75%. BGA showed PH of 7.1 and pco2 110, he was connected to NIV and treated with 100 mg prednisolone, 10 mg morphine, salbutamol/atrovent and adrenaline inhalation, 1 gm magnesium. Nevertheless BGA control was still worse with PH 6.9, pco2 150 mmHg. therefore he was intubated emerge…
X-Ray follow up 2 days later after pleural catheter insertion
❤2
After laboratory investigation, it’s just Smofkabiven ( parenteral nutrition) in the Pleura. No bleeding and no Pneumothorax ! Smofkabiven Thorax !
Ultrasound shows big pleural effusion so pleural catheter was inserted and that’s what came out
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @icudata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yassericu · 38,110
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
@AdrenalinePlatformEg · 25,138
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICU DATA” (@icudata), 2,071 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icudata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.