
Channel
forex course
@ictengl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,573subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001854220605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ictengl |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ictengl |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 2,573 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:26 | 2,572 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 2,572 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 2,570 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 2,571 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 2,572 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 2,574 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 2,577 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 2,574 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 2,584 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 2,591 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 2,590 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@corses3 · 85,673
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 18 August 2026
@The_innercircle_trade · 21,177
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026
@corses19 · 96,317
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
@coursst · 33,664
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
@m3aarf · 338,965
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 August 2026
@KINGFTL_27_MARKETING · 26,139
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
@fisal_alswadi · 36,541
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@tradingxp1 · 23,895
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
@SNDP2P · 32,469
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
@M2_KC · 24,665
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 September 2026
@Crypto_News95 · 26,990
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
@Tradingcoursat · 22,610
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“forex course” (@ictengl), 2,573 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ictengl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.