https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1BRKjZRzekWKw

Channel
ICT Feed
@ict_feed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
862subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001783497068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ict_feed |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 20 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ict_feed |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 862 | -3 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 865 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 869 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 870 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 872 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 876 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 877 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 880 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 880 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
As you spent time with me, you may not have felt like you were learning. That is, until, you see another form of market analysis and it will feel like a rock, it might look green... but you now know... It is not "Jade". As you were...
You have had the real mechanics of Market Making placed before you, like that piece of Jade the young man held. You listen to my long boring lectures & my story on my path here. The arrogant, impatient students do not get what they came for. Those who submit to the process do.
When he felt he had been scammed into doing housework and giving an old man an ear to tell stories to... he was tossed a stone that was not Jade. He recognized it wasn't real Jade because he had been trained to handle real Jade every day. Now, like him... you know real Mastery.
The young man didn't appreciate the wisdom the Jade Master was imparting on him. When he interrupted rudely, the Jade Master would dismiss him for a week. To realize he is back at square one... by his own actions. The young man discovered he was learning what real Jade is...
The Jade Master knew the process of mastering Jade. He placed real Jade in his hand & encouraged the young man to listen to things that will carve out the Master in him first through patience. The young man didn't understand the effects of time & experience has & required...
For those who didn't get the Parable Of The Jade Master... The young man came to the Jade Master with his own idea on how to learn to master Jade. He was arrogant, impatient, ill prepared to learn properly & quick to interrupt the process of training by the Jade Master...
My time will be spent teaching at my own pace on topics I feel led to teach. You will receive new videos, one per day and I am not going to spend my time analyzing markets. You have many new things coming & you're encouraged to study earnestly & refrain from the risk for now.
So I came to you this year with a list of things I was willing to share and prove. For a small, insignificant number, even this will not satisfy or be the evidence. These same people would never be satisfied by any proof I present. I do not care about these people...
As a new card carrying member of the "club"... We do not take odds against the rigged nature of the markets. We simply look for the weak hand at the table and run them off and send them packing for that long regretful flight home. No emotions. It's just business.
Many people come into this industry only to leave empty-handed. Some get the feeling, rightly so, that it's rigged against them. However, they just don't know how it could be. So they leave quietly, never to return. Much like a bad Vegas trip. The curtain is pulled back now.
The Inner Circle Trader Retweeted Marco Le Grange 8h Replying to @I_Am_The_ICT Free market to those who know it's rigged ;)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ict_feed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICT Feed” (@ict_feed), 862 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ict_feed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.