Channel
Ict
@ict_2016
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,422subscribers
+49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001789089329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ict_2016 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ict_2016 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 3,422 | +12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 3,410 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:46 | 3,413 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 3,413 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 3,399 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 3,394 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 3,392 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 3,386 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 3,390 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 3,383 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 3,373 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@redmahale · 47,169
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@BaaTrader · 26,319
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
@forexfactory_persian · 54,101
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
@piknikanalyst_educations · 66,738
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@TradingWithAtrin · 107,410
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@tsestocks · 26,735
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ict” (@ict_2016), 3,422 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ict_2016.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.