Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 59 days, net +1,167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,547–10,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Oct 2026, 02:22
9,889
+35
28 Sept 2026, 22:37
9,854
+47
19 Sept 2026, 05:16
9,807
-29
15 Sept 2026, 03:55
9,836
+23
11 Sept 2026, 05:56
9,813
+47
6 Sept 2026, 07:38
9,766
-57
1 Sept 2026, 15:04
9,823
+691
29 Aug 2026, 09:28
9,132
+49
26 Aug 2026, 01:53
9,083
+55
23 Aug 2026, 12:06
9,028
+92
20 Aug 2026, 01:03
8,936
+66
16 Aug 2026, 20:36
8,870
+73
13 Aug 2026, 16:36
8,797
+29
10 Aug 2026, 18:13
8,768
+46
7 Aug 2026, 20:07
8,722
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:47
8,722
first reading
Engagement
117 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 117 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
854 reactions across 116 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
337
39.5%
😘
87
10.2%
😍
78
9.13%
🕊
61
7.14%
❤🔥
56
6.56%
🤩
50
5.85%
🐳
43
5.04%
⚡
41
4.80%
😎
39
4.57%
💯
37
4.33%
👌
10
1.17%
🤯
7
0.82%
💘
3
0.351%
🍓
2
0.234%
🫡
2
0.234%
👀
1
0.117%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 854 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
يوجد بيع حسابات ممولة مجتازة الاختبار🩵💜✔️
اسعار الحسابات :
حساب 5k مجتاز بسعر 110$😀
حساب 10k مجتاز بسعر 145$😀
حساب 25k مجتاز بسعر 260$✔️
حساب 50k مجتاز بسعر 390$✔️
حساب100k مجتاز بسعر 680$✅
حساب 200k مجتاز بسعر 1230$😀
حساب 400k مجتاز بسعر 2200$😀
اولا: حد الخسارة اليومي 5%🖤
ثانيا: حد خسارة كلي 10%🖤
ثالثا: السحب فوري عند وصول ربح 10%🖤
رابعا: السحب بعد 5 ايام مربحه🖤
خامسة: فيديو تعليمي كيف تحافظ علي حسابك🖤
سادسا:…
اقصد الساعه 2 و 29 دقيقه و 40 ثانيه
شوف عندك فرق الزمن بيكون فرق ساعه مني
بتوقيت السعوديه 3 و 29 دقيقه و 40 ثانيه
بتوقيت مصر ما اعرف كم بس شوف انا وريتك الوقت عندي يعني شوف زمن الرساله كم وكانت عندك كم
بالنسبه لخبر الـ CPI
ايجابي للذهب وسلبي للدولار الامريكي
الساعه عندي الان 1 : 58 دقيقه
اشتري الذهب في الساعه 2 : 59 دقيقه و 40 ثانيه
لا تحط استوب قريب
حط استوب فرق 100PIPS من منطقتك
خليك في مكان سجل التداول وتابع السعر على ربح او على خساره
بالتوفيق للجميع 🤩🤩🤩🤩
𝐬𝐭𝐯!
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @ictXmsnrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MSNR SENPAI” (@ictXmsnrr), 9,889 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ictXmsnrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
