Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Iconicali

Channel

Iconicali

@iconicali

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Cite this entry

1,099subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001446111133
TypeChannel
Username@iconicali
Created3 November 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iconicali

Growth

1,0991,1291,1147 August 2026 — 1,129 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,129 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,126 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,120 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,108 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,104 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,095–1,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 08:551,099-5
25 Aug 2026, 12:421,104-4
22 Aug 2026, 20:391,108-8
19 Aug 2026, 06:111,116-4
16 Aug 2026, 06:081,120-2
12 Aug 2026, 14:441,122-4
10 Aug 2026, 00:011,126-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:001,129no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:161,129first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.15%
avg views ÷ 1,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held5 (5 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total118
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Advertising

Ad load
100.0%
5 of 5 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
25.0
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
no view reading on an unmarked post

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjbwFkd715 August 20265 August 2026
2SDnjcD2zKk16 August 20266 August 2026
2SDnjd3ze6m16 August 20266 August 2026
2SDnjdDP3AA16 August 20266 August 2026
2SDnjdcaFFG16 August 20266 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC14 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdDP3AAPhoto

Палетка теней 🖤 ➡ https://ali.click/99q7612?erid=2SDnjdDP3AA

6 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC23 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdcaFFGPhoto

Заколочки для волос 🍒 ➡ https://ali.click/1m17519?erid=2SDnjdcaFFG

6 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC25 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjd3ze6mPhoto

Подсвечник Кальцифер 🔥 ➡ https://ali.click/qhz331j?erid=2SDnjd3ze6m

6 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC28 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjcD2zKkPhoto

Костюм скелета динозавра 🦖 ➡ https://ali.click/l4ks712?erid=2SDnjcD2zKk

5 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC28 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjbwFkd7Photo

Кейс для наушников 🎧 ➡ https://ali.click/77jq31d?erid=2SDnjbwFkd7

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @iconicali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iconicali” (@iconicali), 1,099 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iconicali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.