Channel
@ichliebez
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,797subscribers
-56 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001983743330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ichliebez |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ichliebez |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 5,797 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 5,818 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 5,830 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 5,835 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 5,847 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 5,850 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 5,853 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13,073 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.37% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5197185082728657600 | 1,094 | 8.37% | |
| custom 5330310278422753071 | 922 | 7.05% | |
| custom 5350343053863302808 | 843 | 6.45% | |
| custom 5906713435214712475 | 782 | 5.98% | |
| custom 5328149454606324240 | 732 | 5.60% | |
| custom 5287765195677005050 | 692 | 5.29% | |
| custom 5350568990617904992 | 647 | 4.95% | |
| custom 5350420389044430985 | 635 | 4.86% | |
| custom 5424894576496240744 | 594 | 4.54% | |
| custom 5334985401864037210 | 554 | 4.24% | |
| custom 5384465430863688237 | 388 | 2.97% | |
| custom 6133996322765670894 | 379 | 2.90% | |
| custom 5339224530290224451 | 351 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5193056962027213174 | 338 | 2.59% | |
| custom 5233744097755279725 | 318 | 2.43% | |
| custom 5300994317718937268 | 297 | 2.27% | |
| custom 5460991530351220905 | 293 | 2.24% | |
| custom 5906774385095610306 | 283 | 2.16% | |
| custom 5424751326452019843 | 280 | 2.14% | |
| custom 5381819464721381817 | 272 | 2.08% | |
| 10 further kinds | 2,379 | 18.2% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,073reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 27 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ichliebez. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2025 to 27 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ㅤ ㅤ ⌛️: чонгук делал предложение руки и сердца своему лорду целых восемь раз — и столько же раз получал отказ, но всё равно не сдавался ㅤ
custom 5197185082728657600922custom 6133996322765670894308custom 5339224530290224451275
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 5197185082728657600172custom 533922453029022445176custom 613399632276567089471
ㅤ ‘’🤩🤩🤩 он говорит «я не буду умолять тебя остаться», но китэн сказал «я не могу пообещать тебе отыскать эти земли, но могу пообещать попытаться. и сделать все, чтобы тебе было хорошо, даже если мы до самой смерти будем бороздить моря в поисках. только останься со мной» ᯓ ᡣ𐭩 ㅤ
custom 5424894576496240744556custom 5424808101624703783195custom 5424751326452019843179
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 5424751326452019843101custom 542489457649624074438custom 542480810162470378336
ㅤ ㅤ 🌑: астронавтам разрешалось загадать три любых желания за успешно выполненную миссию, а кьюриосити потратил все три желания на чонгука, чтобы сделать его самым счастливым на свете ㅤ
custom 5906713435214712475672custom 5906774385095610306225custom 5906550595824651435217
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 5906713435214712475110custom 590677438509561030658custom 590655059582465143547
ㅤ ‘’🤩🤩🤩 он говорит «я люблю тебя», но винсент сказал: «‘зайчонок’ равно ‘люблю’, чонгук-и. я теперь зазайчонкаю тебя. до бесконечности» ᯓ ᡣ𐭩 ㅤ
custom 5350343053863302808796custom 5384465430863688237289custom 5381819464721381817234
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 538446543086368823799custom 535034305386330280847custom 538181946472138181738
ㅤ ㅤ 🤩: гуго, узнав, что муж тэхена ударил его и угрожает, избил того до полусмерти, заставил подписать документы о разводе и оставил в живых только потому, что тэ наблюдал за их дракой ㅤ
custom 5330310278422753071791custom 5193056962027213174297custom 5233744097755279725275
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 5330310278422753071131custom 523374409775527972543custom 519305696202721317441
ㅤ понизить свои стандарты? пока другие парни предпочитают молчать, когда оскорбляют их возлюбленных, генерал ким отрубил конечности человеку, посмевшему унизить его мужа, и заявил, что явится за каждым, кто осмелится порочить память о его супруге ㅤ ‘’🤩🌑🍂
custom 5350568990617904992615custom 5460991530351220905192custom 5287472321857071258188
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 5460991530351220905101custom 528747232185707125832custom 535056899061790499232
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ichliebez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,075,316 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“любовь – это когда” (@ichliebez), 5,797 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ichliebez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.