Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NEURAHIM

@ibrablogs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,293subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001040571932
TypeChannel
Username@ibrablogs
Created15 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ibrablogs

Growth

2,2932,2942,293.55 August 2026 — 2,293 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,293 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,294 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,293 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,293–2,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:272,293-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:112,294+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:512,293no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:122,293first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 2,293 subscribers
Avg views / post
676
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held17 (2 August 202518 July 2026)
Views total1,352
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

314 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28691.1%
🤔144.46%
😢82.55%
🤯61.91%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC837 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Давно не было самобытных коротких микронейроподкастов. Этот подкаст сделан за завтраком между дежурствами с Сапият Руслановной - пока что единственной взрослой активной официальной нейрохирургиней Дагестана. О том, почему она ушла на дежурства, о нейрохирургии Дагестана в целом и о всяком другом. Да, вот так взял и сделал подкаст за 10 мин и выложил. Можно ждать месяцами условий и идеала, а можно взять и сделать.

25

15 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC515 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @derbentnovostiVideo

✂️На днях в отделении нейрохирургии Дербентской центральной городской больницы впервые провели операцию на головном мозге пациентки, жаловавшейся на сильные боли. 📃Операция, которую проводили врачи‑нейрохирурги вместе с ассистентами, длилась более трёх часов и завершилась успешно. Это значимое достижение: впервые в Дербенте выполнена столь сложная операция. В непростых условиях специалисты продемонстрировали высокий

21🤯3

8 Apr 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,060 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

с днём нейрохирурга у меня этот день попался в период, когда идёт перезагрузка вообще всей нейрохирургической пути. ретракция. мой философский период, когда важно понимать, что важно, а что нет решалы нейрохирургии пытаются решить твою судьбу. власть имущие пользуются этой властью не только во блага развития нейрохирургии, но и... чисто так, понаказывать. ограничивать в этот раз я понял, что чтобы заниматься нейр

43

8 Apr 2026, 13:04 UTC837 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ну щас хотя бы путешествую по СКФО )

10

8 Apr 2026, 13:04 UTC855 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @O5_tvPhoto

Когда речь идёт о здоровье, важно попасть к специалисту с реальным опытом. Саламов Ибрагим Пайзутдинович — нейрохирург, прошедший обучение в ведущих медицинских центрах России и за рубежом. Работает с патологиями головного, спинного мозга и нервной системы. Консультация — это не просто приём. Это понимание вашей ситуации и чёткий план действий. 📍 Хасавюрт 📞 8 928 517-15-15

1

14 Mar 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,200 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Че делаешь? Короче. Много что поменялось. За последнее время. Частная нравится. Эндоскопия. Боль. Убирать ее. Реконструктивная нейрохирургия нравится. Устал от бумаг. Госки. Неблагодарной работы. Переработки ненавидеть стал. Операции сложные делать, а потом еще из-за них же страдать... Идейность. Наука. Инновации. Это все никому не надо. Лишь бы по башке не били. Так и живут. Клоунада. Я подумал, что поберегу у

37🤔14😢8

14 Mar 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,070 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подкаст коротенький может посмотришь https://rutube.ru/video/3ea7378d74f816526e84fb7594390af9/?r=a

10

8 Feb 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,320 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iqdocaiPhoto

IQDOC запущен: ИИ-поисковик для врачей от Medach официально начал свою работу IQDOC — это специализированный ИИ-поисковик для врачей. Мы загрузили в систему актуальные Клинические рекомендации, Приказы и НПА Минздрава, чтобы вы могли получать точные ответы, не перечитывая многостраничные PDF. Это не просто поиск по ключевым словам. Система понимает медицинский язык, синтезирует информацию только из официальных и про

12

27 Nov 2025, 19:42 UTC≈1,830 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а завтра буду выступать тут

15

27 Nov 2025, 19:41 UTC≈1,620 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Выступил сегодня на обществе хирургов Дагестана

16

6 Nov 2025, 17:15 UTC≈1,670 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Идите! Это наш учитель — любителей планировать операции и любителей закрывать дефекты черепа с применением 3D-технологий В том числе по причине полезных уроков Дмитрия Николаевича я начал применять в Дагестане и внедрять активно в практику! https://checkout.tochka.com/19e848bb-6d55-4e5d-b607-bc3156bc8ed8/pdt_LMTk5zrfvM8kY27f

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ibrablogs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 891,457 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NEURAHIM” (@ibrablogs), 2,293 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibrablogs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.