Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for style me, queeki

Channel

style me, queeki

@iamqueeki_style

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002169675251
TypeChannel
Username@iamqueeki_style
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iamqueeki_style

Growth

222223222.510 August 2026 — 222 subscribers11 August 2026 — 222 subscribers25 August 2026 — 223 subscribers10 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 222–223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 05:58223+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:36222no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:46222first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 16 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52988717921258868748132.9%
custom 51972448471985842364217.1%
custom 52087163268890799033815.4%
custom 5197202713569408512208.13%
custom 5197689183040193783176.91%
custom 5206566743002070383176.91%
custom 5244661681283415843145.69%
custom 520216952112468843472.85%
custom 524490028389657905162.44%
custom 524487410607090847941.63%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 18 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2025, 15:30 UTC≈1,120 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

про вещевую формулу вещаю видели тренд в reels: — давай не наряжаться, я буду в джинсах и топе (скучный и неактуальный лук) — я тоже (но тут уже стильный классный трендовый образ) как раз пример работы такой формулы) вещевая формула это буквально формула из элементов одежды, например: джинсы + топ + жакет юбка + лонгслив шорты + футболка + косуха почему стоит уделить этому внимание? потому что это простой способ

custom 519724484719858423612custom 52988717921258868747custom 52448741060709084794

17 Sept 2025, 19:12 UTC817 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

кстати, заметили в прошлом посте такой style trick, как завязанные «в пучок» спортивные штаны? простой способ немного усложнить такую базовую и расслабленную, почти домашнюю вещь) мы одеваемся (в идеале) только для себя любимой, но теперь представьте, как бы этот прием обозвал чаще всего несведущий в стиле и трендах парень / муж 😂 диалог только что: — Дэн, как тебе такое? (я почти уверена, что он ответит «ну и дич

custom 524466168128341584314custom 52988717921258868747

17 Sept 2025, 17:15 UTC666 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52065667430020703839custom 52988717921258868746

17 Sept 2025, 17:14 UTC644 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026

согласно иронии судьбы, после последнего поста на меня свалилось много работы) только на этой неделе я отдаю 3 файла, одну капсулу, проверяю 20 домашек учениц и пишу столько же текстов сразу чувствуется осень — летом все расслаблены + одежды минимум и с ней легче справиться с приходом холодов все в панике хотят учиться / собирать капсулы / узнавать, какой у них типаж, чтобы хотя бы чуть чуть стало проще)) а я пока

custom 520871632688907990314custom 52021695211246884347custom 52988717921258868745

17 Aug 2025, 14:42 UTC800 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

пора возвращаться в канал :) не смогла пройти мимо этой футболки с ‘моим типажом’ #FragileGirl пришлось просить подругу привезти из Москвы. иногда очень скучаю по российским брендам 🥹 какой типаж / конкретную девушку подробно разобрать в ближайшие дни?

custom 519720271356940851216custom 52988717921258868749

3 Jul 2025, 09:09 UTC≈1,070 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🥲// кто-то скажет, что хотелка бесполезная, но не я

custom 529887179212588687412custom 52087163268890799039custom 52065667430020703834

30 Jun 2025, 10:07 UTC930 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

а еще вб идеален для коротких трендов, когда не хочется тратить миллион денег на вещи, которые станут неинтересны уже в следующем сезоне что бы я взяла из этих соображений ↓ топ с асимметрией на одно плечо не то чтобы это уже завтра станет неактуально, но как будто всем должно поднадоесть пластиковые / акриловые браслеты, например, такие: раз два резиновые уродцы 🥹 юбка алладины (можно как топ) брюки алладины

custom 519724484719858423621custom 52065667430020703834custom 52988717921258868744

30 Jun 2025, 09:43 UTC738 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

открываю для себя вб, только когда прилетаю в россию если честно, вообще не очень его люблю 🤭 и вы не поверите, но свой первый заказ я сделала только прошлым летом) в совокупности, у меня там покупок (для гардероба) штук 10-15 максимум но, конечно, всегда можно найти стоящие позиции мои находки в этот раз: корсетный топ — по магазинам бегать было некогда, а образ на выпускной к сестре был очень нужен)) хорошее ка

custom 520871632688907990315custom 51972448471985842368custom 51976891830401937837

16 Jun 2025, 15:59 UTC801 views52 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

вашему стилисту сегодня 27 платье — zara 🧈

custom 529887179212588687431custom 519768918304019378310custom 52449002838965790516custom 51972027135694085124custom 51972448471985842361

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @iamqueeki_style. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 740,747 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“style me, queeki” (@iamqueeki_style), 223 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iamqueeki_style.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.