19 Jun 2026, 21:42 UTC228 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
она ждала свой холодный coffee 🤩🙏🧚♀
custom 523373548205090160515custom 523567863262979457510custom 53099451712977285487💋4custom 54336709212588208312custom 52354528891487157641
Channel
laluna ☾
@iamlaaluna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
194subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001653855604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iamlaaluna |
| Description | место, где живут воспоминания boost: https://t.me/boost/iamlaaluna TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@li_llana?_r=1&_t=ZS-91h1uYb7xqi Inst: https://www.instagram.com/imlaaluna?igsh=NnNsYzd4YXJkamNm&utm_source=qr |
| Created | 26 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iamlaaluna |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 194 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 194 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 601
- Videos
- 164
- Links
- 21
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
147 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5233735482050901605 | 32 | 21.8% | |
| custom 5309945171297728548 | 26 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5235452889148715764 | 25 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5235678632629794575 | 22 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5433670921258820831 | 19 | 12.9% | |
| 💋 | 17 | 11.6% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 4.08% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
19 Jun 2026, 21:07 UTC227 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
yesterday таким светлым и счастливым выдался выходной 💅💄 part 1. два айс латте, деловые поездки по городу и обсуждение последних событий☕️☕️с красоткой @bbbonnna за рулем part 2. ужин в benny kitchen with @lawyer_arbuzer — грелись под лучами солнышка на веранде и радовались завершению сессии 💌
💋13custom 53099451712977285488custom 54336709212588208318custom 52354528891487157643💔1custom 52337354820509016051
17 Jun 2026, 09:08 UTC199 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
and again [ Vinyl ]🎀 bag: ценный подарок от @sqliksy
custom 53099451712977285489custom 54336709212588208318custom 52354528891487157647💔2custom 52356786326297945752custom 52337354820509016051
8 Jun 2026, 15:24 UTC279 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
пляжный сезон на берегах объявляется открытым [🌟 / 👁️]
custom 523373548205090160515custom 523545288914871576414custom 523567863262979457510💔3custom 53099451712977285482custom 54336709212588208311
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @iamlaaluna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,169,815 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“laluna ☾” (@iamlaaluna), 194 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iamlaaluna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.