Channel
@i_tweett
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,336subscribers
-367 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001701987377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i_tweett |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i_tweett |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:59 | 8,336 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:39 | 8,351 | -16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 8,367 | -25 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 8,392 | -19 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 8,411 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:05 | 8,426 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:09 | 8,439 | -16 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:11 | 8,455 | -14 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:09 | 8,469 | -33 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 07:41 | 8,502 | -34 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 8,536 | -69 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 8,605 | -34 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 8,639 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 8,657 | -26 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 8,683 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:50 | 8,703 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
384 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 159 | 41.4% | |
| 👍 | 117 | 30.5% | |
| ❤ | 56 | 14.6% | |
| 👎 | 24 | 6.25% | |
| 😐 | 20 | 5.21% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 384 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2024 to 18 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یجوری بعضیا "فقط" برای نیاز جنسی وارد رابطه میشن که انگار توی جسمتون ،شهوت ریختند و انگار افتخارتون،تنها هرزگیست. شهوت خوبه اما مکمل عشقه و به واسطه ی عشقه که بوجود میاد و قشنگ میشه و تویی که به دروغ اسمشو میزاری عشق فقط حیوون صفتی. @i_tweett
👍42❤4👎2
کمی انرژی بگیریم 😂😍 @i_tweett
❤20🤣9👍4😐1
دیالوگهای که تو این چندتا انیمیشن دیدم واقعا عالی بودن پیشنهاد میشه حتما ببینید👌 @i_tweett
👍13❤1🔥1
فقط یه مغز مریض میتونست اینو بسازه😂 @i_tweett
🤣14
کیر تو دهن من که تجربی نخوندم @i_tweett
🤣30❤3
خوبه که حرفهای آلن دوباتن رو هم درباره "اضطراب موقعیت" بشنوید: @i_tweett
👍6❤1
خرید تموم محصولات اپل توسط جناب کیوان برا نامزد عزیزشون @i_tweett
😐10👎1
آب دستتونه بذارید زمین و برید این فیلم رو ببینید. سال 2016 کمپانی Netflix با تیم ایرانی یه فیلم تو ژانر ترسناک به زبان فارسی ساخت به اسم Under The Shadow که بیشتر ایرانیها اصلا ازش خبر ندارن و ندیدنش. خلاصه که دیدنش رو پیشنهاد میکنم اگه میخواید پشماتون بریزه. 📽UnderTheShadow #معرفی_فیلم @i_tweett
🔥4❤1
کاری خداپسندانه و قابل تقدیر @i_tweett
❤15👍11
تو این ویدیو نتیجه تصمیماتی که میگیریم خیلی واضح تر دیده میشه. درس عبرتیه برا خودش. @i_tweett
👍11
وقتی مجبوری ترکی فکر کنی ولی فارسی حرف بزنی😂 @i_tweett
🤣15👎3
آره پامو میوزارم تو لیوان قهوهات، مثلا چیکار میخوایی بکنی؟ @i_tweett
❤9👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @i_tweett. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آی توییت” (@i_tweett), 8,336 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i_tweett.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.