Что думаете?
- И так штрафов полно!29%
- За такое можно и штрафануть71%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍8❤1

Channel
@i_boshim
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,161subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001870532588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i_boshim |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i_boshim |
Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 1,161 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 1,166 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 1,167 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 1,168 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:03 | 1,169 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 1,167 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 1,169 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 1,169 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
159 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 86 | 54.1% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 17.0% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 14.5% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 6.92% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 3.14% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍8❤1
💡 За нештатный ксенон хотят лишать прав Национальный автомобильный союз предложил ужесточить наказание за установку нештатных ксеноновых фар и мигающих задних фонарей. Обращение уже направлено в МВД. Сейчас за такой тюнинг предусмотрен штраф 500 рублей и предписание устранить нарушение. В НАС считают эту меру неэффективной и предлагают повысить штраф до 30 000 рублей, а также ввести лишение прав. По мнению инициат…
👍17❤2
🚕 Самозанятым таксистам разрешили работать на иномарках. Но с условиями. Госдума приняла закон об отсрочке требований по локализации такси для самозанятых водителей. Использовать иностранные автомобили им разрешили до 1 января 2033 года — если машина внесена в реестр такси и попадает в региональную квоту. 📌 Что важно знать: — квота на иномарки для самозанятых — 25% от общего числа такси в регионе; — автомобиль долж…
🔥4❤3👍2
🚸 Штрафы за перевозку детей без автокресел повысили. Закон принят. Госдума во втором и третьем чтениях одобрила ужесточение ответственности за нарушение правил перевозки детей. Что меняется: — для обычных водителей штраф вырос с 3 000 до 5 000 ₽; — для должностных лиц — с 25 000 до 50 000 ₽; — для юрлиц и ИП — 200 000 ₽ вместо 100 000 ₽; — самозанятых таксистов будут штрафовать как должностных лиц — 50 000 ₽. Напо…
👍12
Камеры ГИБДД не видят «корочек»: в Совфеде обсудили штрафы для судей и депутатов ⚖️📸 В Совете Федерации подняли неожиданную проблему: дорожные комплексы фотофиксации штрафуют «спецсубъектов» наравне с обычными водителями. По закону судьи, прокуроры, сотрудники СК и депутаты обладают неприкосновенностью — инспектор ДПС не может просто так привлечь их к ответственности. Однако в КоАП нет механизма, который освобождал …
👍16❤4😱4😡3🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤔4
Цены на автомобили всё-таки растут: вступил в силу новый утильсбор ⚡️ С 1 декабря изменился порядок расчёта утилизационного сбора. Главное нововведение касается машин мощнее 160 л.с. — коэффициенты для них выросли многократно. Что важно знать: 🔴 Порог мощности. Если автомобиль имеет двигатель мощнее 160 сил, сумма сбора резко возрастает. Это касается как новых, так и подержанных авто, ввезенных из-за границы. 🔴 Ц…
В Госдуме предложили официально разрешить водителям копировать видео и аудио из материалов дела о ДТП — не только смотреть их на экране у инспектора. Поправки планируют внести в статьи 25.1, 25.2 и 25.5 КоАП, расширив список того, что считается «материалами дела», и дав участникам право делать выписки и снимать копии на свои устройства. Инициативу поддержал глава комитета по соцполитике Ярослав Нилов — идею ему пере…
👍13
«Бабушкин схематоз»: суды начали отбирать машины у честных покупателей 👀 Самое важное рассказали в новом выпуске автоновостей ⚡️
👍4🔥4😱1
А что вы думаете про новые дизайны знакомых брендов?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Audi показала кроссовер нового поколения, созданный вместе с китайскими партнёрами. Главное: на носу больше нет четырёх колец — вместо них светящаяся овальная рамка. ℹ️ По технике и оснащению: — скрытые ручки, камеры вместо зеркал — LiDAR на крыше для автопилота — моторы от 299 до 787 л.с., адаптированные под кроссовер В продаже — с 2026 года. Эпоха четырёх колец — всё ❓
🤔7❤4👎3
Нива на автомате, а за отсутствие страховки штрафуют камеры. Что ещё нового для автомобилистов - в нашем обзоре ✨
👍6❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @i_boshim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А что вы думаете про новые дизайны знакомых брендов?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кстати, как вам такой формат?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 19 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iBOX: Айбошим по главной 🔞” (@i_boshim), 1,161 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i_boshim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.