Channel
@iTwiter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
948subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001318094200 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iTwiter |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iTwiter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 948 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 953 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 957 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 964 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 964 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
76 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 51 | 67.1% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 18.4% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 6.58% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 6.58% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2025 to 22 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔛 کانفیگ اختصاصی Fast VPN 🪩 لینک اتصال : vless://[email protected]:443?path=%2F&security=tls&alpn=h2%2Chttp%2F1.1&encryption=none&insecure=0&fp=chrome&type=ws&allowInsecure=0&sni=fast.spacenetpro.xyz#%40FasTVpn2%20%20%3A%20%DA%A9%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%20%D8%AA%D9%84%DA%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85 - @FasTVpn2
خیلی از دخترها توی رابطه دنبال گزینههای دیگهاند. تا زمانی که یکنفر رو اوکی نکنن با پارتنر فعلیشون بهم نمیزنن، دلیل راحت مووان کردنشونم همینه! پسرها هم راحت فرندزون میشن و تو نیمکت ذخیره میشن، همه درها به روی دخترها بازه تا برند دور بخورن و برگردن!
👍5
بوی گُل فضای شهر را پر کرده است. مصرفش چنان شایع است که کمتر دختر یا پسر نوجوانی را میبینم که مصرف نکرده باشد. دیدن این همه نوجوانی که با مِیل، اشتیاق و گاها افتخار به گل کشیدن نگاه میکنند، قلبم را به درد میآورد. شاید امروز نه، اما دههای دیگر اثر این شیوع عجیب را خواهیم دید.
👍3❤1
کسی که در تاریکی با ما نیست, هنگام طلوع هم به او نیازی نیست!
❤2👍2
تا این من، من، شده است؛ صدها من، در من، دفن شده است.
👍5
اینکه همه ی راه ها رو ببندی که نره چه فایده داره؟ باید همه ی راه ها باز باشه و اون موندن و انتخاب کنه.
👍4
واقعاً نمیدونم دارم چیکار میکنم، فقط میدونم زندگی نمیکنم.
👍3
یه دورانیم از زندگیت هست که واسه یه مدت حالت خوب نیست؛ ولی وقتی ازت می پرسن خوبی؟ دیگه روت نمیشه بگی نه. خجالت می کشی. می شینی می شماری می گی خب، اون بار گفتم نه، دیشبم گفتم نه، امروز باید بگم خوبم.
👍4
به عنوان یه بالای ۳۰ به شما جوون ترها میگم که گرون ترین و دردآور ترین درسهای زندگیتونرو قرار ارزون ترین و بیکیفیتترین آدمای زندگیتون بهتون هدیه بدن
👍6
عشق و دوست داشتن در نگاه اول رو نمیدونم ولی به گند خوردن تو یک لحظه به همه چی شدیدا اعتقاد دارم
👍3
گاهی اوقات اینجوریه که طرف واقعا دوست نداره. فقط میدونه که تو آدم خوبی هستی، و نمیخواد ببینه اون عشقی که بهش دادی رو به کسِ دیگهای بدی؛ همین.
👍4👌1
اونجایی که چشمت دنبال یه آدم، یه ماشین و یه پلاک آشنا میگرده، ته ته دلتنگیه…
😢5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iTwiter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- Twiter” (@iTwiter), 948 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iTwiter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.