Каждый день выкладываю ТУТ модное музло 😗 и цитаты из советских фильмов 🍿
❤9😇4🔥2

Channel
@iSpirits
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
243subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001742019681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iSpirits |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iSpirits |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 243 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 243 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
263 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 36.9% | |
| 😭 | 32 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 11.8% | |
| 😇 | 30 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5256077408003443294 | 22 | 8.37% | |
| custom 5215278998262657553 | 11 | 4.18% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 3.04% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 3.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.28% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.28% | |
| 🤗 | 6 | 2.28% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 1.14% | |
| custom 5204268664915764765 | 2 | 0.76% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.38% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 23 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iSpirits. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2025 to 23 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Каждый день выкладываю ТУТ модное музло 😗 и цитаты из советских фильмов 🍿
❤9😇4🔥2
Мне не нравится вайб этого канала так что всем советую подписаться на канал анал номер 2ва !!!🫶🙏🫶🫶Вход свободный🥰🥰❤️❤️❤️❤️ https://t.me/+JjWCdId73bgxODRi
✍8custom 52560774080034432944custom 52152789982626575533❤1
Кайф существует он реален он всегда рядом ……
❤22🔥2custom 52152789982626575532
Мой путь становления жирным вонючим мужиком не встающим из-за компьютера день #1
🔥15custom 52152789982626575534custom 52560774080034432943❤1
Посоветуйте вкусных напитков какихто необычных в банках или бутылках 🙏
❤7😇2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤21🔥9🤗6😇1custom 52152789982626575531
Вам откликаются следующие слова: битеки, сэд чил, крайбокс? Дергают за струны души? Или нет
😭13😇3❤2custom 52042686649157647652
Я скучаю по шинжин дертбаг квинси тайп бит 😓
❤13💯6🔥3😇1
ЕДУ ДОМОЙ В МОСКВУ С ДРУЗЬЯМИ
😇19custom 52560774080034432943❤1🍓1custom 52152789982626575531
Ребят срочно купить портфкль и ручку ? Даст иксов ? Или хуйня ? Че думаете ?
custom 525607740800344329410❤1
👆👆👆😔😔❤️🩹
верните меня в то время когда проходили такие ивенты 🥹
😭19❤🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @iSpirits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“спиритуальный канальчик” (@iSpirits), 243 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iSpirits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.