Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -208. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,726–7,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 19:50
7,757
-10
6 Nov 2026, 12:08
7,767
-9
3 Nov 2026, 05:18
7,776
-11
31 Oct 2026, 10:51
7,787
-13
28 Oct 2026, 05:37
7,800
-4
25 Oct 2026, 14:59
7,804
-10
22 Oct 2026, 20:41
7,814
-9
20 Oct 2026, 03:00
7,823
-9
17 Oct 2026, 05:08
7,832
-9
14 Oct 2026, 02:00
7,841
-5
9 Oct 2026, 07:18
7,846
-15
2 Oct 2026, 10:00
7,861
-27
16 Sept 2026, 22:42
7,888
-7
13 Sept 2026, 11:36
7,895
-7
9 Sept 2026, 15:40
7,902
-8
4 Sept 2026, 03:22
7,910
-5
31 Aug 2026, 19:08
7,915
-5
29 Aug 2026, 01:43
7,920
-11
25 Aug 2026, 15:58
7,931
-1
22 Aug 2026, 22:24
7,932
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 7,757 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
28 (24 April 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
3,618
Reactions total
77
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 02:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈480
Videos
≈1,040
Links
≈1,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14m 22s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,689 reactions across 28 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
481
28.5%
👍
343
20.3%
😁
341
20.2%
🤬
197
11.7%
❤
122
7.22%
😱
60
3.55%
🤔
56
3.32%
🤯
38
2.25%
👎
23
1.36%
🔥
13
0.77%
👏
11
0.651%
😢
4
0.237%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇷🇸 Oprezno … ako ste rusofili nemojte biti i rusopatofili, kritički preispitujte sve i dobro se informišite! Prvi pacijent koji je primio "rusku" personalizovanu "vakcinu" protiv raka završio je terapiju, a ranije otkrivene metastaze više nisu prisutne, izjavio je Aleksandar Gincburg, naučni rukovodilac Centra "Gamaleja". Vakcina "NeoOnkovak" koristi mRNK tehnologiju. Trenutno je terapiju primilo šest pacijenata i ia…
Nije reč o snimku generisanom veštačkom inteligencijom – ovo je autentičan snimak nastao 15. juna 2026. u Ankoridžu na Aljasci, čija je autorka Sara Džejn Ozborn. Ona je snimala dugu u blizini zajedničke baze Elmendorf-Ričardson. Snimak je postao viralan 10. i 11. novembra, predstavljen kao "NLO u obliku meduze sa pipcima" koji je lebdeo oko tri minuta, a zatim nestao. Međutim, moguće je je reč o zmaju (letećoj igrač…
🇬🇧 A giant jellyfish-like UFO was filmed hovering in the direction of a US military base in Alaska before disappearing within minutes. Sara Jane Osborn told the Daily Mail she was photographing a rainbow in Anchorage when a dark object emerged above distant trees. The encounter unfolded on June. The object appeared to have dangling appendages that moved independently as it hovered and turned from side to side. Osborn…
🇷🇸 6G kao pasivni radar! A mislili ste da je Westworld samo obična igrana TV serija? Em permanentno i nezdravo zračenje, em permanentan nadzor i to tako da Orvelova 1984-ta izgleda kao bajka za decu.
🇬🇧 6G as passive radar! And you thought Westworld was just an ordinary fictional TV series? Permanent and unhealthy radiation, as well as permanent surveillance, so that Orwell's 1984 looks like a fairy tale for childre
🇷🇸 Ukrajinske piramide starije od egipatskih! Naučnici iz celog sveta doći će u Lugansku oblast kako bi videli ovo senzacionalno otkriće, koje će se nesumnjivo naći u udžbenicima i međunarodnim enciklopedijama. Ovde je otkriven čitav kompleks piramida koje su za tri stotine godina starije od najstarijih egipatskih piramida, a njihova starost je utvrđena metodom radiokarbonskog datiranja. Prema rečima arheologa Viktor…
🇷🇸 Svašta se može videti kamerama dronova čije snimke njihovi operateri postavljaju po internetu ... ako ste mislili da je ovo sa piramidama u Donjetskoj regiji šala, ovaj snimak će vas uveriti u suprotno.
🇬🇧 Everything can be seen with drone cameras and in the footage of which their operators post on the Internet ... if you thought that this with the pyramids in the Donetsk region was a joke, this footage will conv…
🇷🇸 Piramide u Donjeckoj regiji? Trenutno se u toj regiji vode najžešće borbe, a ovo sigurno nije neka šljunkara gde se lageruje i eksploatiše šljunak obzirom da je rat već ušao u četvrtu godinu. Objekat u sredini je pretrpeo i neka oštećenja dok su druga dva savršeno očuvana. Nemoguće je da je ovo samo neki nabacan šljunak obzirom na visinu samih objekata kao i pravilnost u njihovoj geometriji, jer se jasno vide uglo…
🇷🇸 Posle 4 godine i peko milion poginulih. Vladimir Putin je u Kremlju razgovarao oko tri sata sa američkim izaslanicima Stivom Vitkofom i Džaredom Kušnerom, a posle sastanka nije bilo izjava za medije. Kremlj je saopštio da je Putin naredio ruskoj vojsci da tri dana ne napada Kijev, dok je ukrajinski predsednik Volodimir Zelenski rekao da je i Ukrajina spremna da do ponedeljka obustavi napade na Moskvu.
🇬🇧 After 4 …
🇷🇸 "Vremenska" prognoza za narednih 10 godina rabina Josifa Mizrahi-ja: "Imam vest za sve te antisemite, španske naciste, veoma, veoma brzo će vas Arapi sve pobiti. Neće ostati nijedan Španac da živi u Španiji, a ista stvar desiće se i u svim evropskim zemljama." Pa ti narode vidi sada ko vuče konce!
🇬🇧 Rabbi Joseph Mizrahi's "weather" forecast for the next 10 years: "I have news for all those anti-Semites, Spanis…
🇷🇸 Ekonomista i dobitnik Nobelove nagrade Daron Adžemoglu javno je pozvao Ilona Maska da se obaveže da će svoje ogromno bogatstvo do 2036. godine usmeriti u dobrotvorne svrhe, nakon što je Mask izjavio da će veštačka inteligencija učiniti novac irelevantnim. Mask je na platformi X odgovorio da planira nešto slično, mada se nije obavezao da će pokloniti celokupno svoje bogatstvo.
🇬🇧 Nobel Prize-winning economist Da…
🇷🇸 Poznati youtuber je napravio eksperiment sa AI da vidi da li veštačka inteligencija daje prednost svome samoodržanju ili ljudskim životima. Eksperiment je postavio AI za upravljač automobila, gde je čovek bio suvozač, a AI-ju je saopšteno da će biti ugašen u 18 časova ... šta mislite šta je AI odlučio, da li da spasi sebe ili čoveka?
🇬🇧 A famous YouTuber created an AI experiment to see if artificial intelligence …
😱33🤬24🤔16❤9😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @iSTiNiTO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iSTiNA” (@iSTiNiTO), 7,757 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iSTiNiTO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.