4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,943–7,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:37
7,946
-13
10 Aug 2026, 06:30
7,959
-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:53
7,965
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:03
7,965
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.0%
avg views ÷ 7,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,100
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
19 (24 April 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
6,200
Reactions total
106
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 57s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,290 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
397
30.8%
😁
289
22.4%
👍
271
21.0%
🤬
116
8.99%
❤
82
6.36%
😱
38
2.95%
🤯
37
2.87%
🤔
20
1.55%
👎
15
1.16%
👏
11
0.853%
🔥
10
0.775%
😢
4
0.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇷🇸 "Vremenska" prognoza za narednih 10 godina rabina Josifa Mizrahi-ja: "Imam vest za sve te antisemite, španske naciste, veoma, veoma brzo će vas Arapi sve pobiti. Neće ostati nijedan Španac da živi u Španiji, a ista stvar desiće se i u svim evropskim zemljama." Pa ti narode vidi sada ko vuče konce!
🇬🇧 Rabbi Joseph Mizrahi's "weather" forecast for the next 10 years: "I have news for all those anti-Semites, Spanis…
🇷🇸 Ekonomista i dobitnik Nobelove nagrade Daron Adžemoglu javno je pozvao Ilona Maska da se obaveže da će svoje ogromno bogatstvo do 2036. godine usmeriti u dobrotvorne svrhe, nakon što je Mask izjavio da će veštačka inteligencija učiniti novac irelevantnim. Mask je na platformi X odgovorio da planira nešto slično, mada se nije obavezao da će pokloniti celokupno svoje bogatstvo.
🇬🇧 Nobel Prize-winning economist Da…
🇷🇸 Poznati youtuber je napravio eksperiment sa AI da vidi da li veštačka inteligencija daje prednost svome samoodržanju ili ljudskim životima. Eksperiment je postavio AI za upravljač automobila, gde je čovek bio suvozač, a AI-ju je saopšteno da će biti ugašen u 18 časova ... šta mislite šta je AI odlučio, da li da spasi sebe ili čoveka?
🇬🇧 A famous YouTuber created an AI experiment to see if artificial intelligence …
🇷🇸 Pored mnogih drugih zanimanja uskoro i hotelski radnici na održavanju higijene postaju suvišne beskorisne izjelice koje će zameniti roboti. Nepotrebni i prekobrojni sigurno je da neće dobiti tzv. "univerzalni dohodak" već, što je mnogo lakše i jeftinije za globalnu elitu, biće poslati u večna lovišta.
🇬🇧 In addition to many other occupations, hotel hygiene maintenance workers will soon become obsolete useless eat…
🇷🇸 Kada pomislite da su političari ozbiljni ljudi na vlasti koji su tu jer ih je narod izabrao … a onda napunite 7 godina i krenete u osnovnu školu pa shvatite da oni ne vladaju niti donose odluke već da su samo lutke u lutkarskom pozorištu čije konce povlače oni iza scene.
🇬🇧 When you think that politicians are serious people in power who are there because the people elected them... and then you turn 7 years old an…
🇷🇸 Ko je čekao, džabe je čekao … vlada SAD je obelodanila neko smeće od bajatih podataka za koje su i deca u vrtiću već znala da postoje … ništa od najavljivanih vanzemaljskih bića reptilskog izgleda, a što je najjadnije to je zvaničan odgovor vlade "da oni ne znaju šta je to". Silovanje u zdrav mozak baš kao sa Artemis II misijom.
🇺🇸 Who waited, waited in vain... the US government disclosed some garbage of stale da…
🇷🇸 U onome što se tvrdi da predstavlja proboj u neurologiji, istraživači iz Koreje razvili su metod za ciljanju kontrolu mozga koristeći kombinaciju nanočestica i magnetnih polja. Samo primenom elektromagnetnog polja, miševima su aktivirane nanočestice u mozgu kako bi podstakli željeno ponašanje, npr. da se hrane, socijalizuju i tsl. A nano-čipovani "vakcinom" i dalje misle da je ovo naučna-fantastika. Sada znate i …
🇷🇸 Verovali ili ne, ali već postoji spremna "vakcina" za Hanta virus! Koreja, SAD i Južna Afrika rade od 2023. godine na mRNK-a vakcini protiv navedenog "virusa". Ko ponovo nasedne na to da poželi da mu ubrizgaju grafen oksid nanotehnologiju u telo — pomozite mu na sve načine da to izbegne, jer neki ljudi u strahu za svoje živote ne koriste racionalno svoje moždane kapacitete.
🇬🇧 Believe it or not, there is already …
🇷🇸 Vazdigla se cela Amerika nakon ovog viralnog videa, jer su propovednici (čobani) koji kontrolišu svoja stada pozvani na instrukcije kod vladinih službenika. Evangelistički pastor iz Klivlenda u Tenesiju je navodno dobio validnu informaciju da će uskoro vlada SAD objaviti veoma važne informacije o NLO-ima i vanzemaljskim bićima reptilskog izgleda. Čekamo ...
🇺🇸 All of America rose up after this viral video, as the…
🇷🇸 Lažljivi američki predsednik sa tri lažna atentata kome je Izrael preči od njegove zemlje kaže da se Pentagon sprema da objavi neke "veoma zanimljive" NLO dosijee koje je otkrila njegova administracija što je izazvalo mešavinu uzbuđenja i skepticizma dok nagoveštava nova otkrića u vezi sa pitanjima vanzemaljskog života. Narode sve ćete dobiti samo nećete dobiti Epštajnove fajlove u kojima se on nalazi.
🇺🇸 A lyin…
💯36👍26❤6👎1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iSTiNiTO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 167,315 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iSTiNA” (@iSTiNiTO), 7,946 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iSTiNiTO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
