Channel
@iGoddesp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001980638610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iGoddesp |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 12 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iGoddesp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 15 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 15 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (12 September 2023 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
96 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 33 | 34.4% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 33.3% | |
| 💋 | 30 | 31.3% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2023 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
{ 𖤜 } The lullabies requiems pastorales of bouquets release miscarriage sonnet serenade resonates glad jubilant rhapsodic in the abdomen average of intersection predicament stalemate shmooze, except the descent perambulates there pressure jostle the cynosure quintessence of the cognoscente of the release exemption of the phenomenon dreambout feminine coquette of paradise. Bijouteries ornamentals are sophisticated gra…
❥˖ ࣪𝐄𝐱𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 ⋅•⋅⭒ 📜 ⭒•⋅ 𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐨𝐮𝐬⭒ ۫ ׅ❀⭒ ۫ ׅ꧔ ✤ 𝐆𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐨𝐮𝐬 ꧔✤⭒ ۫ ׅ ፝֯֟𝐏𝐮𝐥𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞 🕰 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 ⭒ ۫ ׅ ፝֯֟ 𝐁 𝐄 𝐀 𝐔 𝐓 𝐘 𓏸 𖧵 𓏸 𝐆 𝐈 𝐑 𝐋
Sticker, posted without a caption
Greatest consider, herewith 𝗔𝘃𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗮 𝗥𝘆𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝘇 salutation to inside cosy headroom. Desire to inquire a small-scale, thereupon achieve you conclude regarding me?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Video message, posted without a caption
🍓33❤32💋30🤣1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «la beauté de Kim Jennie, capable de rendre tout le monde captivé par ell»
Channel name was changed to «la femme gracieus»
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @iGoddesp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Greatest consider, herewith 𝗔𝘃𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗮 𝗥𝘆𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝘇 salutation to inside cosy headroom. Desire to inquire a small-scale, thereupon achieve you conclude regarding me?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2023 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𖤝 ࣪ ֪ ੭ 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗚𝗢𝗗𝗗Ξ𝗦𝗦 ࣪ ⸼ ᪕ ࣪ ˖” (@iGoddesp), 15 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iGoddesp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.