Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ( +222 ) : A-punk-Journey 🩷🕷

Channel

( +222 ) : A-punk-Journey 🩷🕷

@iEnergique

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002829975475
TypeChannel
Username@iEnergique
Description(24): step-a-side, Punker. I'm not into you rn, (personal.) be the Pink inside the Punk, BLACK TEEN-PUNKER. 🩷🕷
Created18 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/iEnergique

Growth

115 Aug 2026, 10:35 — 1 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 10:45 — 1 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 10:3515 Aug 2026, 10:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:451no change
15 Aug 2026, 10:351first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 6280603102974319118625.0%
custom 5326067044007814902520.8%
custom 6280492383012394457520.8%
custom 5289850733011693663312.5%
custom 6208717380642671448312.5%
custom 628062273956479634628.33%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Mar 2026, 02:17 UTC45 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

📝 nemo si gemay kelaa: lalalalala itu nada indah, seperti kamu selalu indah di hati aku 𝗖𝗛𝗥𝗦𝗧'𝗬 فاليرين: inimah cantiknya gak adil banget buat mata gue, unreal bgt 🚸 Patrick.: menyala banget nih cewe satu, kerenn 💞𝘈𝘴𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘢, 𝘊. 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘢: aku tayang kamu, be happy always! coralie: u are so cute💗 Jerrent: 120 characters can't describe how pretty u are 👥 6 people have voted so far. 📖 Personal Board

custom 62806031029743191182custom 52898507330116936631custom 62804923830123944571

18 Mar 2026, 22:58 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

𝐏!𝐧𝐊 𝐏𝐮𝐍𝐤

custom 53260670440078149021custom 62087173806426714481custom 62806031029743191181custom 62806227395647963461

18 Mar 2026, 22:48 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 999+ missed calls from <WhØ? &. 🩷📞 from mohawk buddy ㅤI've been listening to punk-music ㅤsince I was a fetus .......... ㅤ@____🐈‍⬛️💕 #BÃDDÏĒ ㅤMom never gimme curfew ㅤNot spoiled, ㅤThis is FREEDOM. 👻 @iEnergique 📲 lemme put some black and pink colors on my girly stuffs #XoXo I'm about to fight anyone who opposes us!

custom 62804923830123944571

18 Mar 2026, 22:39 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ polished satiny hairclip 🎀 📓 . . gnarly vogue peak! she! magenta pigmented toupee perched on her forefront ^became main spotlight underneath humankind's harsh rumble. smeared 📞 mauvish-crimson lipgloss; adding lot of > aura ' increasing scream through obsession. fuchsia life ./🗑🩷 👛🐈‍⬛️ ?¿ the punk was born popstar's henceforth batch" pre-order now % +1-999-

custom 52898507330116936631custom 62087173806426714481custom 62804923830123944571custom 62806031029743191181

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @iEnergique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,507,278 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“( +222 ) : A-punk-Journey 🩷🕷” (@iEnergique), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iEnergique.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.