تم زيادة مخزون الحسابات العربية ar ✔️.

Channel
رشق العرب ~ رشق تصويت ~ رشق تلي
@iDiii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
114,003subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001197105684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iDiii |
| Description | • مرحبًا بك في بوت رشق العرب ——— ~ افضل بوت رشق في العالم ~ رابط البوت ↫ t.me/zzkBot . ——— • المطور الرسمي : @zzz_z 👨🏻💻. |
| Created | 9 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iDiii |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 114,003 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 114,013 | -106 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 114,119 | +46 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 114,073 | -107 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 114,180 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 114,166 | +117 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 114,049 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 114,049 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.75%
- avg views ÷ 114,003 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,280
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (11 April 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,240 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 27
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 25
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
شنو نظيفه او لا
- اي نريده كلش81%
- لا ما حاجة22%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
تردون نظيف ميزة رشق تصويت يستحق؟
تم تحديث البوت 🔔. تمت إضافة زر فحص الطلب 🔍. في حال لم يكتمل طلبك عند فحص طلب سيتم إعادة المبلغ إليك ✔️.
نقاط هدية ل 1000 عضو اضغط هنا. 🔗
رشق العرب ~ رشق تصويت ~ رشق تلي pinned «🔥🔥 تمويل ثابت وحقيقي 100% — شغل بدون توقف 🔥🔥 🚀 زيد مستخدمين قناتك أو مجموعتك بقوة 📈 ارفع التفاعل خلال وقت قياسي 🤖 أسرع بوت في الوطن العربي 💸 ✔️ مستخدمين حقيقيين ✔️ تفاعل فعلي ✔️ نتائج مضمونة 💥 عروض نقاط قوية يوميًا: - ⚡ 120 نقطة يوميًا لمشاركة الرابط 🇮🇶…»
🔥🔥 تمويل ثابت وحقيقي 100% — شغل بدون توقف 🔥🔥 🚀 زيد مستخدمين قناتك أو مجموعتك بقوة 📈 ارفع التفاعل خلال وقت قياسي 🤖 أسرع بوت في الوطن العربي 💸 ✔️ مستخدمين حقيقيين ✔️ تفاعل فعلي ✔️ نتائج مضمونة 💥 عروض نقاط قوية يوميًا: - ⚡ 120 نقطة يوميًا لمشاركة الرابط 🇮🇶 - 🎁 50 نقطة هدية يومية 🇮🇶 🔥 لا تضيع الفرصة ابدأ الآن وخلي قناتك تتحرك فعليًا 🚀
رشق العرب ~ رشق تصويت ~ رشق تلي pinned «تم إصلاح الهدية اليومية في الموقع ✔️.»
تم إصلاح الهدية اليومية في الموقع ✔️.
تم إصلاح الهدية اليومية ✔️.
رشق العرب ~ رشق تصويت ~ رشق تلي pinned Deleted message
رشق العرب ~ رشق تصويت ~ رشق تلي pinned «## 🚀 رشق تلقائي تفاعلات، مشاهدات، تصويت… بضغطة زر! # 🤖 بوت رشق العرب — أقوى خدمات التلكرام 🔥 • 🗳 تصويت حقيقي وسريع جداً • ❤️ تفاعلات ولايكات على أي منشور • 👁🗨 مشاهدات مجانية لكل رسائلك • 👥 حسابات عربية 100% وفعّالة • 🛡 آمن تماماً ولا يسبب طرد من…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @iDiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شنو نظيفه او لا
- اي نريده كلش81%
- لا ما حاجة22%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 725,990 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رشق العرب ~ رشق تصويت ~ رشق تلي” (@iDiii), 114,003 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iDiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.