Channel
@hznmg1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
299subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003861424500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hznmg1 |
| Created | 2 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hznmg1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 299 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 297 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 297 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (2 March 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 764 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
14 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
8.1 #锦鲤 @jinli139544 @teeleegrem #雅雅 @HzYYa8 @lal1213 8.2 #呆咪 @daimi546 重拍 #上官欧阳 @hz00099 8.3 #暖暖 @nuanlom @xiaonaigou5205 #小龄 @uuuy3456 @wangxi713 8.4 #菲菲 @ygkjgkgk @fanrensun #小鱼 @AmangGo7 @fanfan5567 8.5 #可可 @keke5200603 @dsghfdhj #欣怡 @Xinyi467 @ro_maja 8.6 #晚晚 @wan9462 出 #姐妹花 @Jiemeihuaa 8.7 #小柒 @xiaoqi626508 #乐乐 @liqing0170 8.8 #小婷 @xiaoting688 #冉冉 @dgtt1210 8.…
7.2 #汐汐 @xix170 @wenxin1出 7.3 #九儿 @jiuer061599 @hg53771 出 #西贡小公主 @kuangye5322221 @NeverMore_668 出 7.4 #小宝 @UCC8886 #洛洛 @luoluo123666 出 7.5 #小十二 @xxshier08 @feng020503 7.6 #贝贝 @beibei0790 @langkme 出 7.7 #小奈 @XIAONAI00612 @wuwuuwwuw 出 7.8 #暖暖 @nn200311 @thegame122 出 7.9 #嘟嘟 @dudu1562 @Wunengdezhangfushiwo 出 7.10 #蕃茄酱 @xiaoyumi666 @feng020503 出 7.11 #小婷 @xiaoting688 @fortunaskygrey 出 #妍宝 @yanbao1896…
❤3
4.30 #富裕 @fuyu1866 @junjun_ice 报告已出 5.1 #困困 @zizjw7 @zhanzhan321 老师失联，已退 5.2 #台球助教小墨 @zhaoxiaomo 报告已出 @luckyjugglu 5.3 #娜美 @dfghd2467 @cjhaonan 报告已出 5.4 #茁茁 @zx77723 @cchaha8th 报告已出 5.5 #蓓蓓 @beibei9931 @zgdalong 已出 5.6 #婉儿 @wangerspaa #小鱼 @xiaoyu_74 @lal1213 出 5.7 #沛沛 @pp9999pps @liuxiahui09 报告已出 5.8 #夏思吟 @ShmilyRich @lcr123456 已出 #佳怡 @jymmh @qwerdake99 出 5.9 #小酒窝 @xiaojiuwoyy @xindong52 已出 5.10 #泡芙 @pao…
❤2
嫩妹馆活动/群务公开群 pinned a photo
半价p 竞拍预告 15号开始启动 3.15 #米乐 @mile192 @jwdlh233 3.22 #尤尤 @youyff9 延后 3.23 #茁茁 @zx77723 @xmtx233 报告已出 3.24 #许梦辰 @Linmucheng188 @balaba666 报告已出 3.26 #小布点 @httpstmexiaobudian5203 @hmgtq_icj 报告已出 3.28 #小橙橙 @zy1026888 @thegame122 报告已出 3.30 #依依 @yiyi285 @gan0813 4.1 #夏天 @xiatian0113 @a1773738 报告已出 4.2 #忧忧 @youyou668669 @devilwontcry333 报告已出 4.3 #徐梦瑶 @xumyar @solong_nihao 报告已出 4.5 #小鹿鹿 @luluaaalua @KevinRedamancy…
❤5
『清退与下榜规则』 第一： 工兵认证期老师未通过工兵认证，列入清退名单。 第二： 已通过工兵认证的在榜老师累计 3 份差评报告，列入清退名单。 第三： 长期离杭或主动要求下榜的老师，列入清退名单。 第四： 发生恶劣事件被各大群通报的老师，列入清退名单。 第五： 工兵验证期间，若发生罚站工兵、鸽子工兵等行为，列入清退名单。
❤1
『工兵竞拍规则』 第一： 当工兵竞拍结束后，若竞拍第一名因自身因素需要退出工兵，则须向管理说明，竞拍第二名有权获得补位资格。 同时竞拍第一名所消耗的嫩币不做退还，竞拍第二名应划扣的嫩币减半。 第二： 若竞拍第一名在竞拍结束后退工兵，竞拍第二名不接受补位，则竞拍重开，同时竞拍第一名消耗嫩币不做退换。 第三： 若重开竞拍后，同样发生退工兵情况，则参照第一条处理。 第四： 若二次竞拍均退工兵，则此名额自动归入报名区，按报名区统一嫩币要求报名。 注意：所有工兵活动，都须48小时内出击，如有特殊情况请找群内管理报备。
『嫩币规则』 1.群聊积分 本群内积分名为“嫩币”，在群聊内可输入“嫩币”或“嫩币排行”可查看已获得嫩币数量。 2.嫩币获得 本群绩点获得方式有五种： 一、每日首次签到获取 10 嫩币。 二、群聊内发言，每次超过3字，可获得 1 嫩币，每日获取上限为 88嫩币。周发言满368额外获取166嫩币。发言每周可获取852嫩币。 三、邀请狼友入群，每次增加 10 嫩币。此方式奖励嫩币无上限。 四、邀请老师来上榜，老师通过工兵验证后增加500嫩币。 五、出击群内认证老师，并提交相应老师报告，奖励300嫩币。 优质报告，奖励500嫩币！ 工兵以及群内抽奖等非原价报告不奖励嫩币 3.嫩币模式 本群嫩币为累计模式，但七天不在群内发言则嫩币清空。 嫩币于2026年8月31日二十四点清零，后面持续半年清分，第二次清分时间为2027年2月最后一天，以此类推！！ 4.嫩币用途 本群嫩币用途为四种： 一、本群“工兵”活动需一定嫩币方可参与。 二、…
❤3
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @hznmg1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hznmg1 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“嫩妹馆活动/群务公开群” (@hznmg1), 299 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hznmg1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.