Channel
@hzgzlspahs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,432subscribers
-1,502 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001571525731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hzgzlspahs |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hzgzlspahs |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 7,432 | -129 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 7,561 | -168 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 7,729 | -195 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 7,924 | -132 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 8,056 | -156 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 8,212 | -133 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 8,345 | -98 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 8,443 | -150 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 8,593 | -111 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 8,704 | -165 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 8,869 | -65 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 8,934 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 8,934 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
名字：娜娜 身高：161 年龄：18 体重：42 胸围：小C 课费：600p45⌚️ 1100p90 ⌚️ 个人特点：粉嫩萝莉 。易高潮 。三点粉 。敏感度高 。服务配合度高 。姿势任选 。女友般的温柔 。 水中箫，鸳鸯浴 。冰火两重天，（🐍吻管饱），无套口及舔蛋蛋，调情，69、情趣，丝袜，姿势任换，激情啪啪！ 夜课可谈，以上服务都有 课时：晚上12点到凌晨8点，不限次（定金200飞机不退） 本人真实视频照片，激情性感，温柔迷人，真胸，紧致💦多，服务态度好！麻烦尽量备好现金😘 🈲：不讲价，不闲聊.不接醉酒课 ，嗑药 后花园 不接私密处长疙瘩的.本人真实照片，娜娜私人订制 联系方式 @li6688li 频道：https://t.me/FkYoldr_BVk0OGZh ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ 🟡投稿上榜管理🟡 🟡珠海9598老师精选报告总群🟡…
❤2👍1
地址。坦洲 年龄。23 照片本人 服务 全套 💰六米一次40分钟内 鸳鸯浴。无套口吹。接吻。69。姿势听哥哥的，激情爱爱， 👉可上门。上门两次起步。 服务时间80分钟收费1300-1500 犯错误扰 拒绝后花园 嗑药 醉酒 拔套 联系方式 @tanzhou8881 频道：https://t.me/+BsuOUicOw2VkZDcx ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ 🟡投稿上榜管理🟡 🟡珠海9598老师精选报告总群🟡 🟡珠海9598老师上榜总群🟡
❤3👍1
🔰出击在榜老师，如遇骗定金，可联系管理进行赔付！ 🔝中山 - #坦洲 💻艺名：#暖暖 👃课室：#拱北 ☕️水费：600/p 1100/pp ✈️联系： @Ynel99 📸双向机器人： @Ynel99bot 💻频道： https://t.me/nuan1919 🎀标签：#鸳鸯浴 #水中萧 #无套口 #各种姿势配合 #丝袜诱惑 ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ 🟡投稿上榜管理🟡 🟡珠海9598老师精选报告总群🟡 🟡珠海9598老师上榜总群🟡 #珠海高端 #珠海全套 #珠海全套
❤2
🔡🔡（珠海/中山）老师上榜总群🔡🔡 🔝中山 - #中山 💻艺名：#欣欣 👃课室：#坦洲 ☕️水费：项目有点多，看下课表哈 ✈️联系： @xinxin822 📸双向机器人： 💻频道： 🎀标签：#18岁 #粉嫩 报告模板 ⭐ 提交报告 ❤️ ❤️ #珠海半套 #珠海老师 #珠海伴游
❤1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @hzgzlspahs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌈珠海深圳中山94.95.98优选修车” (@hzgzlspahs), 7,432 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hzgzlspahs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.