Channel
@hzdabiaoge002
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
189subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003796913954 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hzdabiaoge002 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hzdabiaoge002 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 189 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 184 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 184 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (2 July 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 127 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
全裸公寓SPA 安全靠谱 价格透明 主打高颜值，技术好，服务好， 服务内容4T5T： 🐻胸推👋手推👠足推🐬臀推🦅阴推 工作室营业时间12：00--2：00 外派营业时间：14：00--5：00 杭州预约总入口： 半套SPA总频道选妃 需要预约的大哥们进入所在区域，挑选心仪的妹子，合适的转发资料给客服咨询，以下是各区入口对号入座。 进：西湖区入口 去：余杭区入口 进：滨江区入口 去：萧山区入口 进：临平区入口 去：拱墅区入口 进：富阳区入口 去：上城区入口 进钱塘区钱塘区下沙
Signed 杭州大表哥SPA——人工在线接单中
💋💋
Signed 杭州大表哥SPA——人工在线接单中
（兼职几天） 混血美少女：布丁 天使的容颜，超级温柔的性格 还是一只小白虎噢！🦞特美味 99号：布丁，全身无整，无纹身，小姑娘很可爱，很温柔，不太标准的普通话，听着很舒服，声甜人美 基本参数：05年，身高160 🐻c，体重90 🉑亲👄（不🐍） 🉑🦞 🉑5t（👋🐻🐬🦶🦵） 🉑👅🥚🥚 🉑摸小豆豆（禁扣噢） 🉑飞行旗 （价格💰699） #33公寓泰好看
Signed 杭州大表哥SPA一全区精选SPA会所 一接待客服
77号：18岁 ()（高颜值高服务） 超级纯欲甜妹，温柔可人，服从型人格 身高160，体重45GK，~🐻c+ 🉑👋🐻🐬🦶🦅五T服务，性格活泼开朗~ 🉑🐍🐍 🉑海鲜 要颜值有颜值，要服务有服务！！！ #13号公寓诗颜
Signed 杭州大表哥SPA一全区精选SPA会所 一接待客服
（头牌）酒吧DJ女郎 媚儿（价格：799💰） 520号:媚儿（05年）酒吧打碟选手，新人首次亮相！情绪价值啦满，可甜美，可魅惑，迷人的小妖精 基本参数：身高160 体重85，🐻b➕（一只手握不住） 🉑亲💋（🐍看人） 🉑🦞 🉑5T（👋➕🐻➕🎵➕🐬➕🦵） 🉑👅（🥚🍭） 🉑摸小豆豆（禁扣噢，大哥们心疼下妹妹） 🉑无包装共🛀 🉑变装 🉑飞行棋（一种互动的小游戏） #33号公寓泰好看
Signed 杭州大表哥SPA一全区精选SPA会所 一接待客服
4️⃣号雯雯身高175 06年已认证 童颜巨乳 大🐻F bbw欧美身材 臀围120又翘又大 微胖肉感天花板 腰曲线比例完美 能解锁的很多 4tttt➕🐻➕🐬➕👋➕🦶 回首掏➕柔丝掼制诱🔥 🉑😘 🉑亲亲🉑掼蛋， 🉑道具🉑👅🥚一口双🥚 🉑摸小豆豆 #4号公寓深蓝
❤1
Signed 杭州大表哥SPA一全区精选SPA会所 一接待客服
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @hzdabiaoge002. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 806,267 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杭州大表哥SPA一总频道4T5T” (@hzdabiaoge002), 189 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hzdabiaoge002.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.