Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 杭州各区域全裸选妃!

Channel

杭州各区域全裸选妃!

@hz93spa999

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,852subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003488425966
TypeChannel
Username@hz93spa999
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hz93spa999

Growth

1,8181,8521,83510 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,831 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,829 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,828 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,832 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,844 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,852 subscribers10 August 202614 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 35 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,813–1,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 08:401,852+8
10 Sept 2026, 22:421,844+12
6 Sept 2026, 09:221,832+4
2 Sept 2026, 03:381,828+2
30 Aug 2026, 06:131,826-3
27 Aug 2026, 07:231,829-2
24 Aug 2026, 05:351,831+10
20 Aug 2026, 03:541,821+3
16 Aug 2026, 20:351,818-5
10 Aug 2026, 11:571,823+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:151,822first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @HZspa005Photo

五号“七七” 颜值抗打技术拉满 服务意识超强 身高165 ,45kg、人美声甜、纯欲小女仆•皮肤紧 致 翘臀 🐻b🈶弹性 标准5ttttt(🐬🐻👋🦶🎵) 🉑🦞,69 🉑🐍 🉑🍼🥚 🉑摸小豆豆 —无限火力 老粉丝都知道 约到是运气 配合度 颜值 肺腑之言 真特别好“”

16 Jun 2026, 12:50 UTC≈2,880 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

工号:007 艺名:薇薇 身高:162 04年 🐻大D 项目:4t、🉑😘、04 年大学毕业生、温柔小女生、清纯可爱、身材好、非常嫩、情绪价值高 情商高会聊天、配合度没得说~🔥🔥 新人下海!!行动起来

1

16 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,180 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

工号:88号 艺名:露露 身高:168 48kg 03年 🐻b+ 项目:5t(🐻👋🐬🦶🎶)🉑🦞、御姐类型 大店出身 头牌选手 颜值相当的高、情绪价值超顶、看一眼就能让人欲望缠身 心动不如行动

1

16 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,540 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

工号:55号 艺名:小蓉 身高:160 92斤 00年 🐻C 项目内容:5T(🐻🦶👋🐬🎶) 🉑🦞 大店出身 气质出众 性格温柔 配合度超高 互动性强 身材比例完美 技术性选手 服务选她准没错 放心闭眼冲

16 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

工号:11号 艺名:十一 身高:170 48KG 04年妹妹 🐻C 项目内容:5T(🐻🦶👋🐬🎶) 🉑 🐍💋 可🦞 抖音网红下海 颜值超绝 服务超高 身材完美 大哥们抓紧了,约到就是赚到 价格 (799)

16 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,730 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

工号:999 艺名:布丁 身高:165 42kg 04年 🐻C 项目:5T、 可🦞 、皮肤光滑水嫩 颜值顶美、服务一流 、配合度高 第一眼的感觉心动生情、照片就是本人 价格(799) 岁数太大不接 望理解(抱拳)

1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @hz93spa999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“杭州各区域全裸选妃!” (@hz93spa999), 1,852 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hz93spa999.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.