ПРИВЕТ КРАСИВЫЙ 😭

Channel
хённихоум | slow
@hyunjinx0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
147subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003369615083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hyunjinx0 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hyunjinx0 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 147 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 144 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 143 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.8%
- avg views ÷ 147 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 27.7
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 30.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 443 |
| Reactions total | 133 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 59s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
133 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5375056785310785554 | 40 | 30.1% | |
| custom 5422364681845114451 | 30 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5368569572217624367 | 23 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5273904649018055935 | 22 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5368532029908493191 | 18 | 13.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ребята уже на синей дорожке!!
[hyunjin in bubble] — я так хотел хорошо станцевать «surfin' boy» — я был так благодарен сонбэ, которая переснимала со мной снова и снова.. она даже купила всем мемберам кофе — и кюджин выложилась больше всех среди всех, с кем я когда-либо снимал танцевальные челленджи — это был первый раз, когда кто-то объяснял мне каждую мелочь и деталь, поэтому у меня у самого разгорелся азарт, и мы подстраивались друг под друга.…
custom 52739046490180559351custom 53750567853107855541
челлендж this & that от хёнджина и кюджин из nmixx
custom 53750567853107855545custom 53685320299084931912custom 54223646818451144512
началась синяя дорожка, ссылка: http://www.youtube.com/live/MUFDsyfhkp4
custom 53685695722176243671
лино поделился трогательной историей о хёнджине 🥹 он сказал, что всякий раз, когда у них плотный график или трудное время, хёнджин всегда первым пытается всех подбодрить, чтобы все мемберы получали от него силы 🫶
custom 52739046490180559355custom 54223646818451144514custom 53750567853107855543custom 53685695722176243672
ДОБРОЕ УТРО ХВАН ХЁНДЖИН
custom 53750567853107855545custom 52739046490180559353custom 53685695722176243673custom 54223646818451144512custom 53685320299084931911
стэй которые сегодня будут на фестивале « sbs gayo daejeon summer » услышали такие песни: ceremony this & that chk chk boom miroh
custom 52739046490180559355custom 53750567853107855542custom 53685320299084931911custom 53685695722176243671custom 54223646818451144511
сегодня скизы выступят на летнем фестивале « sbs gayo daejeon summer » начало : 08:00 укр/мск сам фестиваль : 13:00 укр/мск
custom 53750567853107855545custom 52739046490180559352custom 53685320299084931912custom 53685695722176243671custom 54223646818451144511
хёнджин снял челлендж «surfin' boy» с сыльги из red velvet 🙏
custom 53750567853107855544custom 54223646818451144513custom 52739046490180559351custom 53685320299084931911custom 53685695722176243671
💬 хёнджин, когда айен трогает своё ухо? 🥟 чонин.. когда смущается, когда думает и когда делает что-то не так. он обычно такой: «хех, простите» 🦊 ах да, трогаю своё ухо 💬 ААА ТАК МИЛО! 🦊 ну, я и правда часто смущаюсь 💬 правда? 🥟 СЕЙЧАС! СЕЙЧАС! *трогает ухо* 💬 отлично, а теперь скажите что-нибудь для стэй 🦊 стэй, мы возвращаемся с this & that. а ещё пришли на шоу «machunda kany» и усердно работаем над продвижением. по…
custom 53750567853107855545custom 52739046490180559352custom 53685320299084931911custom 53685695722176243671custom 54223646818451144511
ПРИВЕТ ЛЮБИМЫЙ
custom 53685695722176243678custom 52739046490180559351custom 53685320299084931911custom 54223646818451144511
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hyunjinx0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 476,942 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@allmega100 · 82 postscoop !
@hyunjincoop · 42 postschuu soul ⊹ ࣪ ˖ ໒꒱ 🍨
@ChuuSoul · 1141 post౿。° xiumin ˢʰᵒᵒᵐʸ`
@e_xiu_o1990 · 1451 postfor liz
@forlizzz · 1891 postWon in a billion 🍋
@jungwonmangowon · 1061 postUp with 丽Katarina
@karinaloovers · 601 post果冻 riize୧ ‧₊°
@loveisjelly · 1971 poststrange forever
@ncej02 · 1991 post이건 jinhyul!
@ohyulwoojin · 1021 postphámberry brew
@phamberry · 1461 postabout shimkongz ⋆︎
@shimkongzworld · 1841 post♡︎ song hyeongjun = love ♡︎
@SHLcravity · 1011 post67th boy louis
@six7louis · 1581 postOnly One ✶ Seungwan
@wendystilllike · 721 postyenyuland ᯓᡣ𐭩
@yenyuland · 2051 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“хённихоум | slow” (@hyunjinx0), 147 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hyunjinx0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.