Channel
@hw_dsj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,018subscribers
-65 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001777033310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hw_dsj |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hw_dsj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 2,018 | -56 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 2,074 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 2,083 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,099 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#泰国资讯：突发重大数据泄露！内政部高清公民原图外泄，总理高官人脸资料全部流入黑市 泰国频道权威晨间栏目重磅曝光一起国家级重大隐私泄露事件，泰国全境公民海量高清身份数据遭非法外流，在黑市公开流通，风险程度空前严重，引发泰国全社会恐慌。 据网络安全专业人士证实，本次外泄数据源头直指泰国内政部官方身份登记系统。与以往模糊压缩、翻拍扫描的泄露文件不同，此次流出的全部是官方存档原始高清原图，画质清晰度甚至远超民众日常手持身份证、实体证件上的印刷照片，细节完整、可直接用于各类人脸识别核验。 本次数据泄露覆盖面极其惊人，并非只涉及普通百姓。泰国现任总理、多名内阁部长、各级政府官员的官方存档人脸照片全部曝光外泄，全民无差别中招，泄露规模属于泰国近年最严重的一次公民信息安全事故。 安全机构紧急警示，这批超高清人脸原图外流，将带来两大致命风险，极易滋生大规模跨境诈骗与黑灰产犯罪： 第一，极易被用于AI换脸、3D活体伪造诈骗。 高清原始人…
柬埔寨单日新增10例新冠确诊 柬埔寨卫生部8月6日发布通告，全国单日新增10例新冠肺炎确诊病例，均为本土社区感染病例；同日新增4例治愈出院病例，无新增死亡病例。 在前一天（8月5日），卫生部同样通报新增10例本土确诊病例及5例治愈病例。
林某等8人跨境电信网络诈骗案一审宣判 江苏广电8月5日报道：近日，江苏省淮安市清江浦区人民法院对林某等8人跨境电信网络诈骗案件一审宣判。 经审理查明：2023年3月，林某等8名被告人看到境外高薪招工信息，明知岗位涉嫌违法，仍以旅游为名弄虚作假办理护照，前往东南亚某诈骗窝点。该案系刘某、洪某（现在逃）操控的犯罪集团，通过社交软件虚构人设，诱导境内受害人在虚假资金盘投资实施诈骗。8名被告人在窝点负责账号养号、话术聊天，参与诈骗活动。被告人回国后陆续被公安机关抓获。 法院认为：8名被告人明知他人实施电信网络诈骗，仍赴境外加入犯罪集团，行为均构成诈骗罪；弄虚作假骗取护照出境，同时构成偷越国（边）境罪，依法数罪并罚。综合犯罪情节、认罪认罚、退赃等情况，分别判处八人有期徒刑一年二个月至二年不等，并处罚金。 本案一审已宣判。 淮安市清江浦区人民法院
#网友投稿：昨晚，澳门银河门口死了3个人，换汇的起了贪恋，收了人家的钱不办事，被人家追到银河赌场门口直接剁了。
#阿三的呐喊：我来自印度，在贵频道报道一起涉及缅甸正在发生的一起严重诈骗及非法拘禁事件。 目前，我的两位朋友以及一百多名印度公民被困在缅甸。据他们反映，他们被非法控制，并被迫在极其恶劣的条件下工作。他们遭受严重虐待和持续施压，部分人员还遭到殴打，并被强迫从事违背自己意愿的工作。他们并不愿意参与这些活动，但一直受到威胁和胁迫，无法脱身。 由于许多受害者无法直接联系有关部门或寻求帮助，他们请求我代为发出求助信息，希望能够引起相关部门和社会各界的关注，并尽快采取行动。 据了解，这些人都是因虚假招聘和虚假承诺被骗至缅甸，随后被强迫参与针对 Facebook 和加密货币的诈骗活动。其中包括多名印度公民，也包括我的两位朋友。 恳请贵频道将这条信息发布到 Telegram 频道，帮助更多人关注此事，并希望有关部门能够尽快展开调查，采取必要措施，营救被困人员。 您的及时关注和帮助，可能会挽救许多无辜者的生命与自由。 非常感谢您的支持…
#缅媒报道：不要再骂缅甸人啦！敏昂莱：网络诈骗犯罪者99%为外国人 国家总统吴敏昂莱表示，网络诈骗和赌博犯罪的实施者中，99%是外国人，他们通过邻国非法入境缅甸从事这些活动。 总统是在7月31日举行的第三届联邦议会第二次常会第12天会议上，发表政府执政满100天的国家形势演讲时作出的上述表述。 总统称，政府已将网络诈骗和赌博活动认定为针对大众的严重刑事犯罪，并正在强力打击和铲除。 他还表示，为使国家恢复正常状态，将采取多种方式努力推进，并将与中国、泰国等友好国家开展合作。 此外，总统还表示，已指示各地区要强力推进毒品预防打击以及网络诈骗赌博的整治工作。
#柬泰边境：波贝今晚又有泰国无人机飞过上空，飞行过程中引起部分民众关注和不安
#网友投稿：越南和柬埔寨待不下去了，准备进军缅甸干，此地不留人，自有留人处，吃的苦中苦，方为人上人。
#网友投稿：越南盾未来会越来越强势。 这里说的「强势」，是相较于过去的越南盾而言，并不代表未来一定会大幅升值。哪怕只是贬值幅度越来越小，或者长期维持对美元相对稳定的汇率，我认为都算是一种强势的表现。 原因其实很简单。越来越多外资进入越南设厂、投资、招聘员工，他们支付工资、采购和日常经营所使用的，就是越南盾。 我要讲的重点是：过去越南盾几乎年年贬值，一个很重要的原因，是越南长期依赖传统制造业，需要透过货币贬值来维持出口竞争力。 但现在情况已经开始发生变化。 在中美脱钩的大环境下，越来越多产业开始转移到越南，其中不只是传统劳动密集型工厂，也开始出现一些技术含量更高的产业。 例如，部分半导体下游供应链、电子制造及相关配套产业，都陆续开始在越南布局设厂。 我知道，目前越南的产业结构还无法和发达国家相比，也还没有形成完整、高端的产业链。 但不可否认的是，它确实一直在进步，而且这种进步是看得见的。 随着产业升级，企业利润提…
昨天西哈努克市第3分区发生了一起“突袭事件”。 一名年轻小伙骑摩托车速度过快，直接冲进了一家店铺，现场上演了一波“免费试驾入店”。 老板还没反应过来，只听“砰”的一声，小伙和摩托车一起进来了。结果发现人没事，身体素质杠杠的。 小伙从地上爬起来，拍拍身上的灰，看了一眼现场，然后转身就走……
#网友爆料：🇲🇲缅甸掸邦大头团队黑公司（以及黑代理小鬼）。 现在在缅北景栋和东枝中间某个半岛上打游击，现公司规模400到500人，近两年一直在这个半岛上游击，到处搬家。具体经纬度暂不报！ 公司老板大头头哥，从瓦邦邦康开始起家当代理。瓦邦严打期间，从邦康搬到大仓结康玻璃厂，然后搬到当阳一期和二期。那时候大头都只是园区股东、小老板，当时团队不到100人。 2024年当阳严打期间，公司全部从二期搬离。大头带领自己团队跑路单干，从当阳搬到现半岛上开始单干，疯狂买人，规模迅速扩大。大头开始独自掌管，成为唯一大老板。 在半岛上，目前也是搬了四次公司。从一开始的学校，到学校旁边大园区，其他人全部撤走，只剩下大头手下的骨干代理。然后又从大园区搬到山上的新园区，园区都没有命名。现在已经从山上园区搬到另外一个山头，树林里面建的铁皮房，全体树林遮挡，工作完全不敢开灯。 公司规模（老板、骨干都是贵州人）：老板：大头。手下大代理：马特、浩宇。欧…
#网友爆料：老挝金三角特区附近这个地方是我待过最垃圾的园区。 从柬埔寨搬过来的，台湾盘两个集团，远航和日天集团。公司一个月只给500生活费，管理像个吃屎的一样，打人、体罚、禁足、不给手机，天天高压。客户开不出来，没有想过自己的问题，好客户不管，烂客户加一大堆。 公司新老员工五六十个，现在只剩下几个，跑路的、打赔付的都有。公司也不想想自己的问题。大老板飞哥估计是吸DU吸傻了，赶快亲自下来看一看你的公司吧，被向南（总监）带的一团糟，真的是吃屎的。 家族企业都是自己人，现在还有200多人困在里面，什么模式都有。也不知道中国警察或者是老挝警察收保护费收爽了，啥都不管。东南亚就是被这样的公司搞得乌烟瘴气的。
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hw_dsj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 66,519 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“海外大事件” (@hw_dsj), 2,018 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hw_dsj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.