Photo, posted without a caption
😁8❤5🤔3👍2

Channel
@hw_code
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
1,544subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001277254773 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hw_code |
| Created | 28 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hw_code |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 1,544 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,545 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 1,548 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 1,551 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 1,552 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 1,554 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 1,554 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
228 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 50 | 21.9% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 18.9% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 38 | 16.7% | |
| 🎉 | 24 | 10.5% | |
| 🌚 | 13 | 5.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 4.82% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.75% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2023 to 27 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hw_code. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 December 2023 to 27 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁8❤5🤔3👍2
https://nixos.org
❤3👍1🤔1😁1😱1
докер и микросервисы это залупа конченая, а фирмы которые это используют просто страдают “shiny new framework syndrome”. Change my mind.
👍23😁9🌚2❤1🤯1
не, ну фабричка то пусть там все равно пыхтит туда сюда... если надо, на Rust перепишем 👍
🌚4👍1😢1
Мда, если даже здесь всё не так однозначно... Ладно, вот вам ещё один спорный тезис. Кто-то в обсуждениях заметил, что некоторые программерские инструменты будто бы специально сделаны сложными в использовании. Например, те же СУБД (почему-то не люблю это слово). Postgres — это, конечно, мощно, но если у вас тоже возникал вопрос: почему бы не использовать MySQL или даже sqlite, то вы не одиноки. На примере того же Лев…
👍9❤2🌚1
"Правильных" ответов не существует :)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6
Я в последнее время часто сижу в Твиттере. Там собралась большая техническая тусовка: люди постоянно создают новые проекты и стартапы, зарабатывают деньги и делятся опытом. После выхода того самого интервью с Лексом Фридманом и Питером Левелсом (ну про Фридмана-то вы наверняка слышали?), там активно обсуждают, нужно ли действительно "вылизывать" свои приложения, делать тесты и писать код "как надо", а не как хочется.…
❤4
каким-то мистическим образом проблема разрешилась... Вот есть что-то такое в этой зелёной галочке эээ успокаивающее?
❤8
В каком то из давних интервью меня попросили предсказать вывод следующего Python-кода: class A: pass class B: value = 1 class C: value = 3 class D(A, B, C): def __str__(self): return str(self.value) print(D()) Эту проблему на тот момент я не мог решить, но я ее запомнил и вернулся к ней только недавно. Ключ к решению этой задачи лежит в понимании т.н. Method Resolution Order (MRO) в Py…
🔥14❤6🌚1😁1
Вот бывает такая фигня, работаешь в своем бранче, никого не трогаешь, но тут надо тесты писать. Написал, запускаешь nox, показывает что coverage 99% где то в совсем другой части проекта, никак не связанной с твоим кодом. Начинаешь вопрошать мол как оно попало в master? Стягиваешь master, запускаешь nox и показывает зеленый билд... Меняешь бранч, показывает что проблема все таки есть. Снова в master обратно, и уже и т…
🌚5❤3😁3
Наконец то норм фронтэнд на питоне? А мне только недавно зашел Next.js... https://x.com/jeremyphoward/status/1818036923304456492 https://fastht.ml Надо попробовать на досуге.
🎉8👍2👎1😁1
ща из калифорнийской комы выползу...
😁15👍3❤2😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hw_code. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
"Правильных" ответов не существует :)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ваша основная деятельность:
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2023 to 27 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hello World” (@hw_code), 1,544 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hw_code.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.