Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مَـــــدّار

Channel

مَـــــدّار

@husseinmadar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,534subscribers

-424 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004418090523
TypeChannel
Username@husseinmadar
Descriptionالقناة الخاصة بالشعر الوجداني | لوحات للشاعر حُسين مَدار القناة الخاصة بالقصائد الكاملة أدناه ⬇️ https://t.me/+YJodcpAuXzU2NTky
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/husseinmadar

Growth

7,5347,9587,7466 August 2026 — 7,958 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,958 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,914 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,743 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,637 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,534 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -424. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,470–8,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:177,534-103
13 Aug 2026, 15:077,637-106
10 Aug 2026, 15:217,743-171
7 Aug 2026, 15:287,914-44
6 Aug 2026, 22:457,958no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:377,958first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 7,534 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.476%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held37 (25 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total38,413
Reactions total183
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 37 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11965.0%
❤‍🔥2815.3%
🔥1910.4%
💔168.74%
💯10.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026

وتدري انه الربحان چي گلبي خلص انت ماتخسر خسارة مثل هاي لو گلب عمرك فرص! تسوه كل عمرك خسارة گلبي واعشگ ما تشاء ماتلگي واحد يحبك ربع حبي لا بأرض ولا سماء

1💯1

15 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC298 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026

١١:١١ انه مشتاگلك والشـوگ گاضيني وانه بلا شوفتك شينفعن سنيني مُـر بيه بحلم اتمنى أحـلـم بيك لان بالصدگ ايست شوفتك عيني

3💔1

15 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC327 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026

بكيتُك لأكثر من مئة يوم حتى الميت يذهب حُزنه بعد الأربعين

3

15 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC344 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

1❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC597 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026

١١:١١ ولهسه ودرب هجرك مالي بي خطوة شيخطي الاعمى لمن يعبر الشــــارع

1

11 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC710 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026

ديربالك على روحك خـاف ماشوفك بعد وخاف ما اگدر أحضنك حتى مابعد الأبد ديربالك على عيونــك حتلو ما يشوفوني تدري عــيـــــنــك أحلى العيون بعيوني تدري لمن تعتنيلي يخضر الـورد بظنوني جيتك وأنـت بمكانك تسوة كل اليجوني شلون لو أحضنك حَـبـيـبـي؟ وأنت كوني

❤‍🔥2💔1

10 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC761 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026

١١:١١ اوصل لحضنك حبيبي چان قمة الأُمنيات وهسه كُل شيء عَــــــدى حبك بيه مات

💔42

10 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC779 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026

غيب شما غبت ما تبرد النار ولا اعشگ عليك المحبس الطوگ أنت وللأبد بعد الأبد هم واذا حبل المشانق بيه مرفوگ احسه اهون من الدنيا بلياك وقيس شگد انه بلياك مخنوگ

💔42❤‍🔥1🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC793 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026

١١:١١ وبـعـد لا بينه اماني ولا نتمنى وبعد لا منكم احنه ولانتو منه ولامريتوا بدروب الــمــحــنـة

🔥53

9 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC761 views7 reactionsread 18 August 2026

خيبه، ذاك الذي كُنت أحسبُ فرحتي دائمًا هو، دائي منهُ سابقاً كُنت سابقاً أما الان صرتُ تائها أتسائل عني ، أتسائل عني ؟ قلبهُ وما ابقاه؟ ابقى اه رفضتُ حيزُ غيرك أنت حُزني شعجب ياروحي صاير أنت حزني؟

❤‍🔥32💔2

9 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC699 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026

صدفه اطك لروحي صورة وهاي اول مره تصعب علي روحي بحياتي احساس خلاني ادوس على امنياتي وهاي هيه وداعتك گلبي نلوه وما اكلك حچي تقليدي وماريدك لو صرت انت الهوى لا اشو انت الهوى والضوى وما اريدك وما اريدك لو عليل وكالوا بس هو طبيبك انه متخدر بمحبتك ومادريت شصار بيه محترگ گلبي عليمن؟ وانت والدنيا عليه

❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @husseinmadar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@husseinmadar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 314,179 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مَـــــدّار” (@husseinmadar), 7,534 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/husseinmadar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.