Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hussam Aljbori

Channel

Hussam Aljbori

@husam1991E

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,118subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355100686
TypeChannel
Username@husam1991E
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/husam1991E

Growth

2,1182,1282,1232 September 2026 — 2,128 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,127 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,118 subscribers2 September 20269 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,117–2,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 08:162,118-9
3 Sept 2026, 16:002,127-1
2 Sept 2026, 13:152,128first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.7%
avg views ÷ 2,118 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.684%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held19 (1 September 20261 September 2026)
Views total19,581
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11787.3%
👍64.48%
👏64.48%
🍓32.24%
🔥21.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC577 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

تذكرون هاي اسئلة الشامل للدور الاول اجه منه الانشائين السائح ويونت ثاني ومن الدور الاول مخلي انشاء الثالثه الي اجه اليوم يعني بهاي الاسئلة مال الدور الاول اجه منه 3 إنشاءات بعد شتريدون وهاي كدامكم👆👆👆

👏6👍54

1 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC670 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

استاذ الحمدلله والشكر الاسئله سهله بفضل الله وبفضلك🧡😘

8

1 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC739 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ماعرف شلون اشكرك 🌹كفيت وفيت. بس اگلگ عفت مدرسين بغداد واجيت يمك الكبير the best ابو حمودي

8

1 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC733 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ححبيب الروح استاذ حسام الاسئله كلش سهله اسئل الله ان يوفقك ويخليك والله ما قصرت ب اي شي ويانه شكراً جزيلاً وربي يسعدك بحياتكم وين ما تروحح يبعد عيوني انت🤍.

6

1 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC741 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام عليكم طبعن كلش كلش نشكرك على وكفتك ويانه طلاب دور ثاني ومرشحاتك كلها اجتي ماكو شي رشحته ماجى وربي يحفظك ويوفقك بحياتك بحق محمد وآل محمد

7

1 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC751 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

الراقي استاذ حسام واحد عالم بالمرشحات واللله كلش سهله وبسيطه ان شاء الله نجيب درجات تفرحك والله اول مرا بحياتي ههيج اجاوب ب انكليزي بسسس ولو انت كلت زهراء متنجحين 😂💙💙💙!

4

1 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC732 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

شكراً كلش هواي استاذ ع تعبك ويانه ووكفت ويانه لاخر لحضه للدور ثاني وشكو شي رشحته اجه نصاً وكلها من ملزمتك والامثله حرفياً كلمه شكر قليل بحقك الله يجازي تعبك بالخيرَ💙،

3

1 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC728 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

والله انت ملك الانكليزي الله يوفقك ابو حمودي ما قصرت❤🤍

5

1 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC≈2,780 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

هاي وكفتك مانساها والله ربي يحفظك ويبارك بعمرك ويوفقك بحياتك بحق محمد وآل محمد

4

1 Sept 2026, 07:21 UTC703 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام عليكم استاذ اسئلة حلوة وبسيطه صح ما داخلة بلكروب دور الثانية بس الملازم موجودة

4

1 Sept 2026, 07:21 UTC691 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

استاذنا الغالي ماقصرت الحمدلله الي نبهتنا عليهن اجن وخاصة الاختيارات نصا والانشاءات ربي يوفقك ويخليك ويسدد خُطاك ويجعلك خير للناس🤍✨

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @husam1991E. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بيج جبلة الرسمي
@at120o · 32,509
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
وظائف بابل الحلة
@babilcom2 · 35,572
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hussam Aljbori” (@husam1991E), 2,118 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/husam1991E.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.