Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 广州(百花园)品茶公开榜

Channel

广州(百花园)品茶公开榜

@huiz8867

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,772subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002378193632
TypeChannel
Username@huiz8867
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/huiz8867

Growth

5,7675,7945,780.57 August 2026 — 5,794 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,794 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,792 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,783 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,778 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,781 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,767 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,783 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,781 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,769 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,772 subscribers5,7727 August 202631 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 24 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,763–5,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 14:045,772+3
28 Aug 2026, 13:135,769-12
25 Aug 2026, 06:115,781-2
22 Aug 2026, 16:145,783+16
19 Aug 2026, 13:345,767-14
16 Aug 2026, 21:545,781+3
13 Aug 2026, 11:485,778-5
10 Aug 2026, 10:165,783-9
7 Aug 2026, 19:205,792-2
7 Aug 2026, 16:015,794no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:555,794first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC430 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

艺名:御姐女王梨子 已经视频认证 地区:#天河区 联系方式 : @lizils2 双向: @lizils22_bot 课表照片频道 :https://t.me/lizils8 课费 :800p 1500pp 👑标签:#御姐女王 鸳鸯浴 #69 #水中箫 #毒龙 #舌吻 #无套口 #丝袜 #胸推 #大长腿 #明星气质

11 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC791 viewsread 12 August 2026

近期群里有骗子冒充我,已经踢了3次了 ,上榜老师和群友注意防骗。联系群主记得点击群内的简介里的用户名!

5 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC832 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

艺名: #张小小 地址 : #天河区 私聊:@nuoni88 双向: @nuomi88bot 频道 : https://t.me/zx123413 备注: 下方评论区

1

3 May 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,600 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

艺名: #甜甜 地址: #天河 私聊:@tiantian25789 频道:@tiantian258369 双向:@tiantianYG98_bot 备注: 已验证 #个人老师认证免费挂榜 私聊管理拿认证视频 下方评论区

1

3 Apr 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,400 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😫😫😫😫😫😫 福利频道,资源完整,高清无码,持续更新! 《《《《 每日快播 》》》 😔😖😫😫

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @huiz8867. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“广州(百花园)品茶公开榜” (@huiz8867), 5,772 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huiz8867.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.