🌤💱汇鑫💱🌤 10/8/2026 ====================== 🇲🇾RM TO USDT ACC 🔁 4.090/4.065 CASH KL🔁 4.070/4.045 CASH JB🔁 4.075/4.050 CASH 马六甲🔁4.075/4.050 CASH 槟城🔁 4.080/4.045 CASH 东马🔁 ask/ask CASH 云顶🔁 ask/ask 🥇 ====================== 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) USDT / RMB 6.634 MIN 100,000 6.626 MIN 50,000 6.618 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) • 1.632 MIN 100,000 • 1.630 MIN 50,000 • 1.628 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳支付宝 USDT/RMB 6.597 MIN 30,000 6.585 below 10,000 fee R…

Channel
汇鑫HUIXIN-Law⁵⁵ Official Rate
@huixin55LAW
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
254subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002921002876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @huixin55LAW |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/huixin55LAW |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 254 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 253 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 248 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 247 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 245 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.4%
- avg views ÷ 254 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 92.5
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,202 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
💱 汇鑫(马)集团 💱 您身边的 支付 · 财务 · 开单 · 换汇 专家 ✅ 商业支付 & 金流解决方案 ✅ 外籍员工工资发放 ✅ 多国换汇 + 各国银行卡服务(覆盖 16 国) ✅ 业务覆盖全马 13 州 ✅ SDN BHD 专业开单 / E-Invoice / 报账(合规安全) ✅ 适用多行业:建筑 / 运输物流 / 批发零售 / 手机配件 / Marketing & Event 等 🇲🇾 东马现金业务已开放 📍 Kota Kinabalu (KK) / Kuching ⚠️ 有需要请尽快联系 📩 欢迎正行对接|流程简单|费用透明|1 对 1 专业服务
🌤💱汇鑫💱🌤 --- RM TO USDT --- 🔥ACC 4.085/4.055🔥 🔥CASH KL 4.065/4.040🔥 🔥CASH JB 4.070/4.045🔥 🔥CASH 马六甲 4.070/4.045 🔥CASH 槟城 4.075/4.040 🔥CASH 东马 ask/ask 🔥CASH 云顶 ask/ask check rate before deal 汇率没绑定,交易前确认
🌤💱汇鑫💱🌤 --- RM TO USDT --- 🔥ACC 4.080/4.055🔥 🔥CASH KL 4.060/4.035🔥 🔥CASH JB 4.065/4.040🔥 🔥CASH 马六甲 4.065/4.040 🔥CASH 槟城 4.070/4.035 🔥CASH 东马 ask/ask 🔥CASH 云顶 ask/ask check rate before deal 汇率没绑定,交易前确认
💱 汇鑫(马)集团 💱 您身边的 支付 · 财务 · 开单 · 换汇 专家 ✅ 商业支付 & 金流解决方案 ✅ 外籍员工工资发放 ✅ 多国换汇 + 各国银行卡服务(覆盖 16 国) ✅ 业务覆盖全马 13 州 ✅ SDN BHD 专业开单 / E-Invoice / 报账(合规安全) ✅ 适用多行业:建筑 / 运输物流 / 批发零售 / 手机配件 / Marketing & Event 等 🇲🇾 东马现金业务已开放 📍 Kota Kinabalu (KK) / Kuching ⚠️ 有需要请尽快联系 📩 欢迎正行对接|流程简单|费用透明|1 对 1 专业服务
🌤💱汇鑫💱🌤 7/8/2026 ====================== 🇲🇾RM TO USDT ACC 🔁 4.080/4.055 CASH KL🔁 4.060/4.035 CASH JB🔁 4.065/4.040 CASH 马六甲🔁4.065/4.040 CASH 槟城🔁 4.070/4.035 CASH 东马🔁 ask/ask CASH 云顶🔁 ask/ask 🥇 ====================== 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) USDT / RMB 6.618 MIN 100,000 6.610 MIN 50,000 6.602 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) • 1.632 MIN 100,000 • 1.630 MIN 50,000 • 1.628 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳支付宝 USDT/RMB 6.581 MIN 30,000 6.569 below 10,000 fee RM…
💱 汇鑫(马)集团 💱 您身边的 支付 · 财务 · 开单 · 换汇 专家 ✅ 商业支付 & 金流解决方案 ✅ 外籍员工工资发放 ✅ 多国换汇 + 各国银行卡服务(覆盖 16 国) ✅ 业务覆盖全马 13 州 ✅ SDN BHD 专业开单 / E-Invoice / 报账(合规安全) ✅ 适用多行业:建筑 / 运输物流 / 批发零售 / 手机配件 / Marketing & Event 等 🇲🇾 东马现金业务已开放 📍 Kota Kinabalu (KK) / Kuching ⚠️ 有需要请尽快联系 📩 欢迎正行对接|流程简单|费用透明|1 对 1 专业服务
🌤💱汇鑫💱🌤 6/8/2026 ====================== 🇲🇾RM TO USDT ACC 🔁 4.090/4.060 CASH KL🔁 4.065/4.040 CASH JB🔁 4.070/4.045 CASH 马六甲🔁4.070/4.045 CASH 槟城🔁 4.075/4.040 CASH 东马🔁 ask/ask CASH 云顶🔁 ask/ask 🥇 ====================== 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) USDT / RMB 6.626 MIN 100,000 6.618 MIN 50,000 6.610 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) • 1.632 MIN 100,000 • 1.630 MIN 50,000 • 1.628 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳支付宝 USDT/RMB 6.577 MIN 30,000 6.565 below 10,000 fee RM…
📅 06/08/2026 黄金报价 💰 999.9 万足金(金块) 🔸 1g |RM 571 🔸 100g |RM 58,250 🔸 1KG |RM 571,000 🔥 916 黄金 GOLD → RM(卖金) :RM 501/g(实心) RM → GOLD(买金) :RM 530/g(❌ 不含附加费) 🔥 999.9 黄金 GOLD → RM(金块/金片) :RM 550/g 📍 交易地点 ✅ 新山(JB) ✅ 吉隆坡(KL) ✅ 其他地区欢迎咨询 📩 欢迎询价,实时更新报价。
💱 06/08/2026 今日汇率 🇲🇾 RM ➜ 🇦🇺 AUD:2.73 🇲🇾 RM ➜ 🇸🇬 SGD:3.168 💰 USDT ➜ 🇦🇺 AUD:1.489 💰 USDT ➜ 🇸🇬 SGD:1.283 ✅ 支持大小额 ✅长期稳定货源 ✅大额可议价 ✅可预订快单/慢单
💱 汇鑫(马)集团 💱 您身边的 支付 · 财务 · 开单 · 换汇 专家 ✅ 商业支付 & 金流解决方案 ✅ 外籍员工工资发放 ✅ 多国换汇 + 各国银行卡服务(覆盖 16 国) ✅ 业务覆盖全马 13 州 ✅ SDN BHD 专业开单 / E-Invoice / 报账(合规安全) ✅ 适用多行业:建筑 / 运输物流 / 批发零售 / 手机配件 / Marketing & Event 等 🇲🇾 东马现金业务已开放 📍 Kota Kinabalu (KK) / Kuching ⚠️ 有需要请尽快联系 📩 欢迎正行对接|流程简单|费用透明|1 对 1 专业服务
🌤💱汇鑫💱🌤 5/8/2026 ====================== 🇲🇾RM TO USDT ACC 🔁 4.095/4.065 CASH KL🔁 4.070/4.045 CASH JB🔁 4.075/4.050 CASH 马六甲🔁4.075/4.050 CASH 槟城🔁 4.080/4.045 CASH 东马🔁 ask/ask CASH 云顶🔁 ask/ask 🥇 ====================== 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) USDT / RMB 6.650 MIN 100,000 6.642 MIN 50,000 6.634 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳银行卡中文名(干净款) • 1.634 MIN 100,000 • 1.632 MIN 50,000 • 1.630 MIN 15,000 🇨🇳支付宝 USDT/RMB 6.626 MIN 30,000 6.614 below 10,000 fee RM…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @huixin55LAW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 691,130 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“汇鑫HUIXIN-Law⁵⁵ Official Rate” (@huixin55LAW), 254 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huixin55LAW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.