Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Huidu.io 灰度台灣遊戲圈

Supergroup

Huidu.io 灰度台灣遊戲圈

@huiduiotw

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

2,482members

-85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622033981
TypeSupergroup
Username@huiduiotw
Description🇹🇼 台灣 BC・iGaming B2B 資源交流 聚集熟悉 BC / iGaming 平台、營運與系統整合 的從業者, 交流 產品方案、API 串接與技術資源。 🔹 核心交流 平台方案|系統整合|資料接口|營運工具 🚫 詐騙、誘導式行銷、低品質廣告 ⚠️ 入群請先閱讀置頂規範,違規即移除 #BC #iGaming #平台營運 #API整合 #B2B交流 【官方】 www.huidu.io/zh-TW/ 【服務】 @huiducn 【商務】 @huiduTom8 | @hdjoanna
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
On Telegramt.me/huiduiotw

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4822,5672,524.57 August 2026 — 2,567 members7 August 2026 — 2,563 members11 August 2026 — 2,567 members14 August 2026 — 2,546 members17 August 2026 — 2,545 members20 August 2026 — 2,539 members24 August 2026 — 2,534 members27 August 2026 — 2,531 members30 August 2026 — 2,525 members2 September 2026 — 2,519 members7 September 2026 — 2,505 members11 September 2026 — 2,485 members15 September 2026 — 2,482 members16 September 2026 — 2,482 members7 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,469–2,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
16 Sept 2026, 00:062,482no change
15 Sept 2026, 13:012,482-3
11 Sept 2026, 19:412,485-20
7 Sept 2026, 12:162,505-14
2 Sept 2026, 09:442,519-6
30 Aug 2026, 07:542,525-6
27 Aug 2026, 11:152,531-3
24 Aug 2026, 05:472,534-5
20 Aug 2026, 15:262,539-6
17 Aug 2026, 17:262,545-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:282,546-21
11 Aug 2026, 06:552,567+4
7 Aug 2026, 20:122,563-4
7 Aug 2026, 06:512,567first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Huidu.io 灰度台灣遊戲圈” (@huiduiotw), 2,482 members as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huiduiotw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.