神不在福建 (暂时不打职业) pinned a photo

Channel
神不在福建 (暂时不打职业)
@huichanbro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002207506177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @huichanbro |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/huichanbro |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 107 | -39 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 146 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 147 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 211.2%
- avg views ÷ 107 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 226
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 November 2024 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 226 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👀 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2024 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Channel name was changed to «神不在福建 (暂时不打职业)»
🚀 UO接码|全球短信验证码服务 🎁 国内全网手机号资源源头 ❤️ 日更新号码库20-30% 🤖 Telegram 机器人自动接码 ❤️ 下单 → 获取号码 → 等待验证码 → 自动回传 💰 价格透明,按需使用 🔒 注重账号与数据安全 🕐 机器人全天24*7在线 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 为什么选择 UO接码? ✅ 操作简单,新手也能快速上手 ✅ 全程机器人自动处理 ✅ 实时查看号码与验证码状态 ✅ 多地区号码可选 ✅ 不需要复杂操作,TG内即可完成 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 官方唯一机器人: https://t.me/uomsgbot 官方公告频道: @UOGF1 ❤️ UO接码官方频道 免责声明 本机器人仅供合法测试与隐私保护。严禁用于非法活动,因使用引发的一切损失和法律责任由用户自负。 号码上新|活动通知|价格调整|系统维护 都会第一时间在本频道发布。 …
ok啊 我快要被卷死了 毁灭吧 8月初换项目各位老总 我卷不动了 累死累活一天干10多个小时 tm算一下200刀都没有 我还干鸡毛 睡觉 今晚不上班
神不在福建 (暂时不打职业) pinned «重申: 价格对应质量 成本 售后 当一个物品售卖低的一批 你就要站在商家角度看他赚得到底是什么钱 卡商还要吃一层… 这么低价格了 还能继续卷 不考虑质量嘛 都不是做慈善 市场就是被你们这一群傻逼给带偏 给带成如今这个屌样子 买家:要极致利润 哪怕一个号能带来成本+50%利润 为了多5% 10% 就走下家 号商:号滞销 又低价卖 发现可以卖更多 更好卖 继续卷 带崩其他同行接着卷 然后压低成本 卡商也开始压成本继续卷 垃圾卡垃圾技术做出的号诞生了! 完美! 诞生 卖给买家 买家到手…»
重申: 价格对应质量 成本 售后 当一个物品售卖低的一批 你就要站在商家角度看他赚得到底是什么钱 卡商还要吃一层… 这么低价格了 还能继续卷 不考虑质量嘛 都不是做慈善 市场就是被你们这一群傻逼给带偏 给带成如今这个屌样子 买家:要极致利润 哪怕一个号能带来成本+50%利润 为了多5% 10% 就走下家 号商:号滞销 又低价卖 发现可以卖更多 更好卖 继续卷 带崩其他同行接着卷 然后压低成本 卡商也开始压成本继续卷 垃圾卡垃圾技术做出的号诞生了! 完美! 诞生 卖给买家 买家到手 号频繁死架不住卖家随时补号 无所谓 业务越来越难做 平台要求越来越严格 风控越来越严重 漂亮 项目就是被你们这些傻逼带死 其他的不想多说 我不需要这种傻逼客户一边去 记者也滚 不支持先号 怕就走担保交易
神今天有点困 有什么事情联系助手 我先睡了
神也需要休息 睡觉💤
休息了 白天不定时在线 暂时不支持新币担保 具体情况自己去了解最近风波 可以走梦幻开的皇冠
又走一个新币…. 守好自己的钱袋子吧 最近换皮不换血出现的担保会很多
别人问我的青春 我告诉他telegram就是我的青春
❤1
从汇旺担保被国际各方面监管制裁开始 国内黑灰就再也没有当年的荣光 担保们一个一个的跑路 拍卖id 再收购id 换皮不换血 流下来的还是原来的那一群担保…. 天使 卡尔 黑洞 丝绸 老黄 万州 双赢…… 天下英雄如过江之鲫
👀2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @huichanbro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,010,761 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“神不在福建 (暂时不打职业)” (@huichanbro), 107 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huichanbro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.