Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ХАБ

Channel

ХАБ

@hubcryptocis

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,687subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001564072289
TypeChannel
Username@hubcryptocis
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hubcryptocis

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,6354,6944,664.56 August 2026 — 4,649 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,646 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,694 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,688 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,676 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,667 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,658 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,657 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,646 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,635 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,659 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,686 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,694 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,687 subscribers4,6876 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,626–4,703 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 23:194,687-7
11 Sept 2026, 21:004,694+8
7 Sept 2026, 08:214,686+27
2 Sept 2026, 18:584,659+24
31 Aug 2026, 01:054,635-11
28 Aug 2026, 00:544,646-11
25 Aug 2026, 04:234,657-1
22 Aug 2026, 00:074,658-9
19 Aug 2026, 03:084,667-9
16 Aug 2026, 08:454,676-12
12 Aug 2026, 12:054,688-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:224,694+48
6 Aug 2026, 17:304,646-3
6 Aug 2026, 09:214,649first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

270 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤13148.5%
🔥7427.4%
😁3713.7%
👍103.70%
💯62.22%
😢41.48%
🤔41.48%
🥴20.741%
🦄20.741%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 27 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hubcryptocis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC235 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Перечитывал пост и поймал себя на мысли, что местами его словно нейросеть писала, хотя ее я прощу только ошибки править😁 Я как раз где-то читал или смотрел о том, что люди начинают использовать в речи те же приемы, что использует нейросеть из-за того, что очень много с ней общаются.

😁5

11 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC268 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Pinterest Plugin Это самый масштабный, самый комплексный, и, вероятно, самый трудный в реализации проект, который я когда-либо делал. По сути, это уже полноценный SaaS, хотя изначально такой цели у меня не было. Главное — я надеюсь, он будет реально удобным и полезным. После такого громкого вступления расскажу, зачем он нужен, кому подойдет и что в себя включает. Pinterest может быть очень крутым источником практ…

🔥12❤3

10 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC397 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Трудно быть вайбкодером🧃 Чем больше я занимаюсь разработкой, тем более ясно вижу один и тот же паттерн (вообще, уже можно говорить, что я разработкой занимаюсь?). Сделать какой-то продукт сейчас не сложно. За 1-2 вечера можно собрать более менее рабочий инструмент. И вот ты сидишь довольный, с ощущением, что сейчас сделаешь еще миллион разных тулзов и автоматизируешь вообще все, даже сам процесс автоматизации. А по…

❤11👍2🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC511 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

А ChatGPT о вас так заботится? А вот Клод обо мне заботится!

❤8

7 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC592 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Если б я родился в Вологде. Тестирую кое-что😁

😁2

6 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC638 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Накопилось Много всего делал, пробовал, а постика с подборкой давно не было. И вот время пришло: 1. Мой главный кейс последней пары месяцев — автоматизация Pinterest: • Пост, чтобы посмотреть рост в динамике • Большой рассказ про мои 4 аккаунта • Как новый ChatGPT меняет всю систему с Pinterest • Полная автоматизация Pinterest c Hermes ▶️Видео о том, как Hemres ведет мои Pinterest аккаунты и как я набрал 300к+ пр…

❤6🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC594 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какая тема вам интереснее?

  1. Про ИИ — обновления моделей/ новые инструменты/ полезные скиллы, плагины11%
  2. Про ИИ — конкретный опыт применения/ создания продуктов42%
  3. Про крипту39%
  4. Про инвестиции в фондовый рынок8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤5

5 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC632 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня вечером как-то нет желания работать и решил потупить и посмотреть сериал. И когда серия прерывается, показывают рекламу Магнита. И она…сгенерирована ИИ.

😁11

3 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC794 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

GM☕️ Кто-нибудь хочет потестить инструмент для Pinterest, который должен проводить вас за ручку от создания канала до полной автоматизации его работы? Он возьмет на себя все, что только можно взять — анализ, поиск идей, настройку. Руками нужно будет только оформить аккаунт на самом Pinterest + залогиниться на паре площадок. По крайней мере, в теории😁 У вас должен быть Hermes с ChatGPT внутри + желание. Если интер…

❤11

2 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC822 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

По моим примерным наблюдениям, GPT Sol 5.6 (средний уровень мышления) сжирает недельные лимиты за 4 контекстных окна в 250к токенов. То есть, 25% от НЕДЕЛЬНЫХ лимитов за 250к токенов. Клод Опус 5 сжирает 5% недельных лимитов за 250к токенов.

👍2

31 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC793 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Антропик наносит ответный удар🔫 Я больше не хочу хейтить ChatGPT. Я не просто стал к нему нейтрален, я его даже полюбил немного. Он значительно более гибкий инструмент, чем Клод и мне это очень нравится. Но…есть нюансы. Когда вчера монтировал видео, я наглядно увидел насколько работа с Клодом быстрее. Прошлое видео я монтировал в ChatGPT, там были свои прикольные моменты, какой-то другой взгляд на дизайн, но он 1) …

🔥13❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @hubcryptocis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTCAnonymous Poll130 voters

Какая тема вам интереснее?

  1. Про ИИ — обновления моделей/ новые инструменты/ полезные скиллы, плагины11%
  2. Про ИИ — конкретный опыт применения/ создания продуктов42%
  3. Про крипту39%
  4. Про инвестиции в фондовый рынок8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Coin Side | AI х заработок
@coinside_public · 27,293
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ХАБ” (@hubcryptocis), 4,687 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hubcryptocis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.