Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 幻想投票收录

Channel

幻想投票收录

@huanxiangtoupiao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

542subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001174538949
TypeChannel
Username@huanxiangtoupiao
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/huanxiangtoupiao

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

540549544.56 August 2026 — 549 subscribers7 August 2026 — 549 subscribers7 August 2026 — 548 subscribers15 August 2026 — 546 subscribers23 August 2026 — 543 subscribers31 August 2026 — 541 subscribers18 September 2026 — 540 subscribers3 October 2026 — 542 subscribers5426 August 20263 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 57 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 539–550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 05:37542+2
18 Sept 2026, 19:54540-1
31 Aug 2026, 03:46541-2
23 Aug 2026, 03:58543-3
15 Aug 2026, 17:18546-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:52548-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:02549no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:51549first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

13 Apr 2026, 01:01 UTC381 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

你觉得动态漫画与ai动画哪个好?

  1. 动态漫画60%
  2. ai动画40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Mar 2026, 13:22 UTC532 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

你能接受日本AV女优成为你老婆吗?

  1. 只能接受黑人2%
  2. 只能接受黄人33%
  3. 只能接受白人12%
  4. 不能接受53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jan 2026, 07:43 UTC512 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

参加过同学聚会吗?感觉如何

  1. 没有人组织过,没去过54%
  2. 直接拒绝15%
  3. 参加过20%
  4. 参加过,以后再也不会参加11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jan 2026, 17:05 UTC486 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

你有荨麻疹吗?

  1. 有24%
  2. 没有76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2024, 17:40 UTC≈3,020 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

黑神话悟空的女角色你喜欢哪个

  1. 137%
  2. 213%
  3. 333%
  4. 413%
  5. 59%
  6. 69%
  7. 711%
  8. 不喜欢18%

The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Aug 2024, 19:17 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

闻到二手烟你会有什么反应?

  1. 无不良反应37%
  2. 咳嗽14%
  3. 咳嗽胸闷14%
  4. 咳嗽胸闷喉咙痛4%
  5. 咳嗽胸闷喉咙痛呼吸受阻6%
  6. 咳嗽胸闷喉咙痛呼吸受阻头疼25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jun 2024, 16:50 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

谈恋爱就一定要发生性关系吗?

  1. 要75%
  2. 不需要25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jun 2024, 16:12 UTC≈2,170 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

分手后,对方低三下四可怜巴巴求复合,此时你又还单身,你会不会同意复合?

  1. 同意复合35%
  2. 坚决分手65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jun 2024, 15:44 UTC≈4,740 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

如果你是游戏公司老板或负责人,招聘员工你会选择以下哪种人?

  1. 工作能力强的人55%
  2. 热爱游戏的人45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jun 2024, 02:32 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

你是怎样在键盘上打字?

  1. 一根手指16%
  2. 两根手指25%
  3. 十根手指(不看键盘)60%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @huanxiangtoupiao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 17 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Apr 2026, 01:01 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

你觉得动态漫画与ai动画哪个好?

  1. 动态漫画60%
  2. ai动画40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Mar 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Poll100 voters

你能接受日本AV女优成为你老婆吗?

  1. 只能接受黑人2%
  2. 只能接受黄人33%
  3. 只能接受白人12%
  4. 不能接受53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jan 2026, 07:43 UTCAnonymous Poll96 voters

参加过同学聚会吗?感觉如何

  1. 没有人组织过,没去过54%
  2. 直接拒绝15%
  3. 参加过20%
  4. 参加过,以后再也不会参加11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jan 2026, 17:05 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

你有荨麻疹吗?

  1. 有24%
  2. 没有76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2024, 17:40 UTCAnonymous Poll230 voters

黑神话悟空的女角色你喜欢哪个

  1. 137%
  2. 213%
  3. 333%
  4. 413%
  5. 59%
  6. 69%
  7. 711%
  8. 不喜欢18%

The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Aug 2024, 19:17 UTCAnonymous Poll189 voters

闻到二手烟你会有什么反应?

  1. 无不良反应37%
  2. 咳嗽14%
  3. 咳嗽胸闷14%
  4. 咳嗽胸闷喉咙痛4%
  5. 咳嗽胸闷喉咙痛呼吸受阻6%
  6. 咳嗽胸闷喉咙痛呼吸受阻头疼25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2022 to 13 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“幻想投票收录” (@huanxiangtoupiao), 542 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huanxiangtoupiao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.