Channel
@hteditings
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,529subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002215700103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hteditings |
| Description | نکات و تکنیکها لینک کانال اصلیمون: https://t.me/htuniversity |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hteditings |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 4,529 | +25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 4,504 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 4,501 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (15 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 55,497 |
| Reactions total | 1,678 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,785 reactions across 22 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,063 | 59.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 389 | 21.8% | |
| 🔥 | 172 | 9.64% | |
| 👍 | 123 | 6.89% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,785reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه چیزی که خیلی دوست دارم از همتیمی هام بشنوم همیشه اینه: تا فلان موقع تموم میشه. یه حس آرامشی بهم میده از لحاظ ذهنی. مثلا ویدیو رو برام فرستاده تا ایراداتش رو بگم. میگه تا یک ساعت دیگه رویژن تموم میشه. مثلا میگم مشتری رویژن داده: میگه الان خونه نیستم، یک ساعت دیگه میرسم خونه و تا فلان ساعت به دستت میرسونم. خیالم راحته که فلان موقع کار بسته میشه و از لحاظ ذهنی دیگه ذهنم درگیرش نیست. چون به نظرم کار که ددلاین ن…
❤94👍19❤🔥11
چیزایی که داشتم رو گذاشتم تو این لینک: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1r4C8237YNeG8ywvhUA4M6iBcV7RDgEa1?usp=sharing بچه هایی که asset های باارزش و خوبی دارن و میخوان همراهی کنن لطفا ایمیلشون رو پیویم بفرستن دوس دارم این یه پروسه طولانی مدت باشه و به مرور بهش اضافه شه. نه اینکه یه بار اضافه کنیم و ولش کنیم به امون خدا بازم از عرشیا تشکر میکنم بابت این ایده ❤️
❤🔥49❤8👍5
حل مشکل اشکال نگارشی با کمک هوش مصنوعی: همونطور که حسن گفت، راهکار اصولی برای رفع اشکالات نگارشی اینه که همون اول کار وقتی از روی ترنسکریپت کپشن رو درست کردید، برید تو منو کپشن، بزنید روی سه نقطه سمت راست و بعد بزنید Export to SRT file. خروجی رو توی claude آپلود کنید و با یه پرامپت ساده یه همچنین چیزی بهش بگید: این کپشن یه ویدیو است که پریمیر بصورت اتومات از روی یک ویدیو درست کرده. لطفا از لحاظ گرامری برام چکش کن…
❤🔥47❤13👍4👏2🔥2
اشکالات مرگبار نگارشی: از اونجایی که زبان اصلی ما انگلیسی نیست، باید یه تمرکز ویژه روی این موضوع بذاریم که کارمون غلط نگارشی نداشته باشه. این میشه مبانی اولیه و بیسیک کار، حتی از خود ادیت و اون افکتایی که میذارید هم برای بعضی مشتریا مهم تره. بعضی مشتریای روی این موضوع بشدت حساسن. غلط داشته باشه، انگار داری بهش فحش میدی، تا این حد. چون اگه اون کار با یه اشکال نگارشی پخش بشه و چند ده هزار نفر ببینن، اعتبار اون آدم…
❤59👍10🔥4👏1
مفهوم cut-in: تو ویدیوهای تاکینگ هد، برای اینکه کار از یکنواختی دربیاد، قسمتهایی که قراره یه نکته مهمی گفته بشه و میخوایم توجه حسابی جمع بشه، یه کات میزنیم و صحنه بعد رو اسکیل میکنیم. مخصوصا اگه راف کات فقط از یک نما است و دو دوربینه نیست، حتما باید یکنواختی رو با چند کات این از بین ببریم. انکر پوینت رو میذارزیم بین دو چشم طرف و به اسکیل حدود ۲۰ درصد اضافه میکنیم. اینکار باعث میشه مخاطب توجهش یهو جمع نکته مهمی…
❤74🔥10👍5👏1
ساخت باکس تاتیل کارد در پریمیر: دو راه برای ساختش وجود داره که میخوام راحت ترین و سریعترین روشش رو به شما یاد بدم. راه سخت تر اینه که دستی دور نوشته ها اون کادر رو بکشید که با تغییر کلمات، باید شکل رو هر بار دستی تغییر بدید. راه دوم که بصورت اتوماته و خودم همیشه ازش استفاده میکنم، اینه: از قسمت Appearance روی اون آچار سمت راست کلیک کنید. گزینه آخر که Fill mode هست رو بکنید Per-line. (وقتی خط اول و دوم هم اندازه ه…
❤68👍2🔥2
تصمیم گرفتم نکات آموزشی که به ادیتورهای تیممون بصورت خصوصی میگم رو در قالب یک سلسله پست بصورت عمومی منتشر کنم با هشتگ #htlearn. راستیتش دلم نیومد این مطالب خصوصی بمونه:) در واقع میشه یه مینی دوره ادیت از نکات کاربردی که هر ادیتوری باید بدونه! قسمت اول: تایتل کارد تایتل کارد: به اونی که با باکس قرمز رنگ اومده میگن تایتل کارد؛ که بر اساس برند گایدلاین هر مشتری، رنگ و فونتش فرق میکنه. کاربردش چیه؟ مخاطب سریع با موض…
❤89👍14❤🔥8🔥1
یه توصیه برادرانه: سعی کنید تو نیچ و سبکای مختلف نمونه کار داشته باشید. بعضیا میگن ما چند ساله داریم تدوین کار میکنیم و همه نمونه کارهایی که میفرستن فقط توی یه نیچه مثلا املاک. خیلی خوبه تو هر نیچ یه نمونه قوی آماده داشته باشید تا پرسید ازتون تو این سبک کار کردید یا نه، سریع براش بفرستید. اون نمونه کار هم یه طوری باشه که معلوم باشه خودتون زدید، مثلا اگه تاکینگ هد هست، با صورت خودتون باشه، یا یه طوری تصویر خودتون ت…
❤92👍15❤🔥9
14 Vox🟨 Working for Earnedit. @rzmotions
❤76🔥20👏2👍1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LHzBHqdGbY این ویدیو برای لانگ فرم زنا میتونه خیلی خوب باشه. @hteditings
❤19❤🔥2👍2🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤54👍9🔥1
آموزش کوتاه تنظیم صدا @hteditings
❤29🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @hteditings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 158,757 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hteditings named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HT Editing” (@hteditings), 4,529 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hteditings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.