Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HTC CRYPTO | سیگنال کریپتو

Channel

HTC CRYPTO | سیگنال کریپتو

@htc_crypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

127,786subscribers

+9,015 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650789564
TypeChannel
Username@htc_crypto
Description✨Hossein Trade Community✨ همه چی رایگانه هیچ پروژه پامپ و دامپی معرفی نمیشه سیگنال ها و تحلیل ها صرفا نظر شخصیه امیدوارم کنار ما پرسود باشید ♥ عضویت خصوصی : @htcvip_bot Sup: @BtcHossein ناشناس: @Nashenashtc_bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/htc_crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

114,997128,105121,5517 August 2026 — 118,771 subscribers8 August 2026 — 118,250 subscribers9 August 2026 — 117,821 subscribers10 August 2026 — 117,437 subscribers11 August 2026 — 117,022 subscribers12 August 2026 — 116,694 subscribers13 August 2026 — 116,300 subscribers14 August 2026 — 115,782 subscribers16 August 2026 — 115,285 subscribers17 August 2026 — 114,997 subscribers18 August 2026 — 115,902 subscribers19 August 2026 — 116,468 subscribers20 August 2026 — 116,861 subscribers21 August 2026 — 118,801 subscribers22 August 2026 — 120,002 subscribers24 August 2026 — 119,849 subscribers25 August 2026 — 119,587 subscribers26 August 2026 — 119,449 subscribers27 August 2026 — 119,547 subscribers28 August 2026 — 119,786 subscribers29 August 2026 — 120,344 subscribers30 August 2026 — 121,057 subscribers31 August 2026 — 121,786 subscribers1 September 2026 — 122,319 subscribers2 September 2026 — 122,440 subscribers4 September 2026 — 122,695 subscribers7 September 2026 — 124,532 subscribers10 September 2026 — 126,635 subscribers12 September 2026 — 127,435 subscribers14 September 2026 — 128,048 subscribers15 September 2026 — 128,105 subscribers17 September 2026 — 127,786 subscribers127,7867 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +9,015. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113,031–130,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:58127,786-319
15 Sept 2026, 20:37128,105+57
14 Sept 2026, 00:57128,048+613
12 Sept 2026, 11:15127,435+800
10 Sept 2026, 08:18126,635+2,103
7 Sept 2026, 04:02124,532+1,837
4 Sept 2026, 09:57122,695+255
2 Sept 2026, 21:46122,440+121
1 Sept 2026, 19:03122,319+533
31 Aug 2026, 19:26121,786+729
30 Aug 2026, 19:27121,057+713
29 Aug 2026, 21:14120,344+558
28 Aug 2026, 17:41119,786+239
27 Aug 2026, 15:07119,547+98
26 Aug 2026, 11:47119,449-138
25 Aug 2026, 12:47119,587-262
24 Aug 2026, 09:59119,849-153
22 Aug 2026, 20:02120,002+1,201
21 Aug 2026, 09:39118,801+1,940
20 Aug 2026, 10:07116,861first reading

Engagement

362 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.78%
avg views ÷ 127,786 subscribers
Avg views / post
997
203 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
203
of 362 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held362 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total202,307
Reactions total3,438
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 22:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,990
Videos
≈81
Links
≈505

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 45s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,724 reactions across 327 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,15755.2%
🔥90715.8%
👌80914.1%
👍3926.85%
🤣1753.06%
👏1121.96%
😁440.769%
💯340.594%
💔320.559%
🥰320.559%
😢170.297%
🫡40.07%
😇30.052%
😘30.052%
💊20.035%
🤝10.017%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 327 of the 362 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,724 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 362 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 362 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @htc_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 362 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC213 views8 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Voice message

توضیحات راجب پلتفرم های انلاین طلا 💥

❤5👌2🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC279 views13 reactionsread 26 September 2026

دور بعدی مذاکرات قطعا بحث برچیدن هسته ای و حتی موشکی هم ممکن است مطرح شود! هر چه دیرتر توافق شود امتیازات بیشتری باید داده شود!

🔥8👌3❤2

26 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC320 views14 reactionsread 26 September 2026

‼️فوری‼️ ترامپ: پیشنهاد ۷ شرطی جدید ایران را رد کردم

🔥11❤2👌1

26 Sept 2026, 06:29 UTC477 views13 reactionsread 26 September 2026

‏👈وال استریت ژورنال: ترامپ، پیشنهاد ایران برای توافق هفت‌روزه را رد کرده و گفته است که انتظار دارد پس از انتخابات، بمباران ایران را از سر بگیرد پ. ن: اون روزی که گفتم تنگه هرمز میشه نقطه قوت ترامپ کجا بودید؟ در خیال خام خود تنگه رو بسته بودید؟ تحویل بگیرید دیگه تنگه کارتی نداره رو کنید از این به بعد ترامپ میگه یا هسته ای رو تحویل میدید یا توافقی نیست چون تنگه رو هم از چنگ تون در اورد و همینطوری شرایط سخت و سخت تر می…

❤7👌3🔥2👍1

25 Sept 2026, 19:30 UTC443 views14 reactionsread 26 September 2026

🔴 پزشکیان: من از حمایت متفکرانه و مسئولانه رئیس جمهور شی جین پینگ برای بازگشت به تفاهم‌نامه اسلام آباد و حل اختلافات از طریق گفتگو و دیپلماسی قدردانی می‌کنم. خلاصش اینه: بیاین توافق کنیم

👌7🤣5❤2

25 Sept 2026, 18:07 UTC466 views12 reactionsread 26 September 2026

⏺ خبرگزاری‌های داخلی: فرودگاه بین‌المللی نجف هم از این به بعد اجازه‌ی فرودِ هواپیماهای ایرانی رو نمیده؛ علاوه بر اون، امروز مدیریت فرودگاه نجف، به مسافران ایرانی که به نجف سفر کرده بودن اجازه نداد که سوار هواپیما بشن و به ایران برگردن و هواپیمای ایرانی رو خالی! به مشهد برگردوند

🤣6❤3👌3

25 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC522 views20 reactionsread 26 September 2026

خردوغان : ما با هیچ کشوری خصومت نداریم مخصوصا ایران و اسراییل!

🤣16😁3🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC550 views19 reactionsread 26 September 2026

مخبر؛ دستیار ویژه خامنه ای: اگه ایران تو منطقه امکان پرواز نداشته باشه؛ هیچ کشور دیگه ای این امکان رو نخواهد داشت. تا الان پروازها به گرجستان🇬🇪؛ عمان🇴🇲؛ امارات🇦🇪؛ عراق🇮🇶 و آذربایجان🇦🇿 متوقف شده.

❤11🤣4👍3🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC496 views11 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

این اسپات مون تو 2، 3 روز منفجر شد

❤6👍2🔥2👌1

25 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC397 views9 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

دو سیگنال این هفته مون

❤3👌3👍3

25 Sept 2026, 08:26 UTC431 views19 reactionsread 26 September 2026

آمریکا : توافق کنید اگر نکنید هسته ای تونو میزنیم ایران: توافق نمیکنیم اگر بزنی تنگه هرمز بسته خواهد شد آمریکا: زدیم و تنگه رو هم باز کردیم اگر توافق نکنید محاصره دریایی میکنیم ایران: توافق نمیکنیم نمیتونید محاصره دریایی کنید آمریکا : محاصره دریایی کردیم اگر توافق نکنید محاصره هوایی میکنیم ایران : توافق نمیکنیم محاصره هوایی نمیتونید بکنید آمریکا : توافق کنید وگرنه........... و به همین منوال تک به تک کارت…

❤10👍5👌3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 362 posts we hold for @htc_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@htc_crypto edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 September 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HTC CRYPTO | سیگنال کریپتو” (@htc_crypto), 127,786 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/htc_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.