Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for •| حسین مختاری

Channel

•| حسین مختاری

@hsn_mokhtari

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,126subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001516465698
TypeChannel
Username@hsn_mokhtari
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hsn_mokhtari

Growth

7,1267,1357,130.56 August 2026 — 7,135 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,135 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,134 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,126 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,125–7,136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:187,126-8
10 Aug 2026, 06:047,134-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:367,135no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:177,135first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 7,126 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,480
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (27 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total41,368
Reactions total1,252
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,252 reactions across 27 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
74759.7%
👍30124.0%
😭745.91%
👌564.47%
💯322.56%
🤔161.28%
👎120.958%
🔥40.319%
😐30.24%
👀20.16%
😁20.16%
👏10.08%
😍10.08%
🙏10.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,110 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026

وضعیت حجاب افتضاح شده چه کاری از دست ما برمیاد؟! یکی از موثرترین‌کارها اینه که مطالبـه عمـومی نسبت به این موضوع از قوه‌ی قضاییه شکل بگیره! چطوری؟!👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 از طریق ثبت شکایت از سامانه سجام از طریق آدرس زیر👇👇👇 https://sajam.eadl.ir/ وارد که شدید ثبت گزارش رو بزنید بعد از برای قسمت "نوع" گزینه‌ی سایر رو انتخاب کنید برای قسمت "موضوع" گزینه‌ای حقوق عامه رو انتخاب کنید...! بعد گزارش‌تون از وضعیت حجاب رو بنویسید و د

👍4614👎7😁2

11 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC858 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

فتنه اکبر بین مومنین است! آیت الله عابدینی ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ کانال #حسین_مختاری @hsn_mokhtari

👍9

8 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,310 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آیا شاخص قــرار دادن حضــور در خیـابان منجر به این نمی شود که به بخش قـابل توجهی از مردم‌برچسب‌عدم‌ولایت مداری بزنیم؟ جواب: ۱.ولایت مـداری فقط یک شاخـص ندارد امکان دارد فرد در موضوعی ولایت مدار باشد و در موضوعی ولایت‌مدار نباشد و در موضوعی ضد ولایت باشد! ۲.اگــر در موضـوعی اکثـر مـردم به حـرف ولی جامعه عمـل نکـردند باید چه کنیـم؟ برای اینکه‌اکثریت‌جامعه‌ برچسب‌نخورند پس‌دستور‌ولی‌جامعه را بی‌اهمیت جلوه دهیم؟!یا تل

👍2611

8 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,210 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چرا حضور در خیابان شاخص ولایت مداری است؟! چون رهبر انقلاب به صراحت دستور داده اند که مـردم در خیابان بمانند و حضــور مــردم در خیـابان بر نتیــجه‌ی مذاکرات (که مذاکرات همچنان ادامه دارد)موثر است... حال وقتـی دستــور صـریح و شفــاف ولی جامعه‌وجود‌دارد و خلاف آن هم دستوری صادر نشده است پس‌آنکه به این دستور به هر‌دلیلی عمل نمی‌کند نمی تواند خود را ولایت مدار بنامد...! دقت کنیم، حتی اگر یقین کنیم حضـــور در خیابان کا

👍2510👀2👎1

8 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,120 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

حضور در خیابان و حفظ خیابان مثــل سلامتـی است تا وقتـی که هست متوجه آن نمی‌شـویم ولی وقتـی از دست‌رفت و مریضی‌آمد به یاد ایام سلامتی حسرت خواهیم خورد...! #خیابان @hsn_mokhtari

👍3111👎1

8 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,280 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026

شهادت حمیدرضارجب زاده یک پیام واضح و تکلیف آور برای ما مردم دارد و آن هم اهمیت حفظ خیابان است! نکند نسبت به حضـور در خیابان بی اهمیت شویم @hsn_mokhtari

👍8128😭12😐3💯1🤔1

8 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,240 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026

خیابان تمـریـن ولایت مداری ماست... ▪️▪️▪️ @hsn_mokhtari

48👍7👎1💯1

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,370 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

روز جمعه، روز صلوات🌱 ختـم‌ صلوات این جمعه، هدیـه‌ به مهدی صاحب‌ الـزمان‌(عج)‌ به نیت تعجیل در امـر فرج‌ و برطرف شدن موانع ازدواج‌همه‌جوانان ان‌شاءالله

  1. ۱٠٠ تا صلوات 😅79%
  2. ۳٠٠ تا صلوات 😊10%
  3. ۵٠٠ تا صلوات 😌6%
  4. ۱٠٠٠ تا صلوات 😎4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12👎1

6 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,520 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

. . ما باید بچه‌ای تربیت‌کنیم که هم در هـر شرایطی موفق باشه هم با عـزت نفـس و اعتـماد به نفس باشه و هـم قوی باشه و مستقـل و هم با اراده و اهل دین و دین داری و در همه حال هم حالش خوب باشه... همـه این ها در گرو اینه که ما بتونیم بچه ای تربیت کنیم که "باتقوا" باشه! حالا تقـوا یعنی چی؟! و چطوری بچه با تقوا تربیت کنیم؟! #تربیت_فرزند ▪️▪️▪️ @hsn_mokhtari

💯2312👍2🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,230 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

این نماز توصیه مرحـوم آقای بهجت بود و واقعا هم گره‌گشاست،بخونید که ان شاءالله حاجتتون برآورده خواهد شد حتما.... زمانش امـروز تا غـروب هم میشه خوند حدود نیم ساعت هم وقت لازم داره! من خودم از این نماز حاجت گرفتم ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ @hsn_mokhtari

20

6 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,140 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

دست ما با قلم سازگارتر است تا با تفنگ... شهید مرتضی آوینی. https://t.me/hsn_mokhtari

16

6 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,110 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

زان پیش‌تر که عالم‌فانی‌شود خراب ما را ز جام باده گلگون خراب کن... ▪️▪️ @hsn_mokhtari

😭85😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @hsn_mokhtari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

روز جمعه، روز صلوات🌱 ختـم‌ صلوات این جمعه، هدیـه‌ به مهدی صاحب‌ الـزمان‌(عج)‌ به نیت تعجیل در امـر فرج‌ و برطرف شدن موانع ازدواج‌همه‌جوانان ان‌شاءالله

  1. ۱٠٠ تا صلوات 😅79%
  2. ۳٠٠ تا صلوات 😊10%
  3. ۵٠٠ تا صلوات 😌6%
  4. ۱٠٠٠ تا صلوات 😎4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

روز جمعه، روز صلوات🌱 ختـم‌ صلوات این جمعه، هدیـه‌ به مهدی صاحب‌ الـزمان‌(عج)‌ به نیت تعجیل در امـر فرج‌ و برطرف شدن موانع ازدواج‌همه‌جوانان ان‌شاءالله

  1. ۳٠٠ تا صلوات 😅68%
  2. ۵٠٠ تا صلوات 😊25%
  3. ۷٠٠ تا صلوات 😌0%
  4. ۱٠٠٠ تا صلوات 😎7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 536,610 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“•| حسین مختاری” (@hsn_mokhtari), 7,126 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hsn_mokhtari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.