🪙REGVK
custom 60329210492076767961

Channel
@hsbet
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,095,484subscribers
-7,854 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001757084718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @hsbet @hsbet2 |
| Description | HSBET | عالم القمة والأرباح ⚽️💎 🔞 المحتوى مخصص لمن هم فوق 21 عاماً 📈 مراهنات ذكية بأقوى الاستراتيجيات مع كرة قدم • هوكي • تنس • FIFA • سلة ✅ 🎁 جوائز نقدية ومسابقات يومية 🔑 كود الحظ لجميع المنصات HSBET مع 💰 بونص يصل لـ $200 عند التسجيل @HamzaSama |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hsbet |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
On 133 of the 291 posts we watched over 30days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.1551 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /959819 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,390 → 2,820at least +1,420 | 584 → 584at most +1 | +220.3 |
| /959819 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 2,820 → 3,860at least +1,030 | 584 → 584at most +1 | +159.8 |
| /959819 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 3,860 → 5,310at least +1,440 | 584 → 584at most +1 | +223.4 |
| /959819 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 5,310 → 7,050at least +1,730 | 584 → 584at most +1 | +268.4 |
| /959819 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 7,050 → 9,090at least +2,030 | 584 → 584at most +1 | +314.9 |
| /959829 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,440 → 2,990at least +1,540 | 625 → 626at most +2 | +238.9 |
| /959829 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 2,990 → 4,030at least +1,030 | 626 → 626at most +1 | +159.8 |
| /959829 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 4,030 → 5,450at least +1,410 | 626 → 626at most +1 | +218.7 |
| /959829 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 5,450 → 7,190at least +1,730 | 626 → 626at most +1 | +268.4 |
| /959829 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 7,190 → 9,230at least +2,030 | 626 → 626at most +1 | +314.9 |
| /958868 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC | 30 minutes | 361 → 464at least +102 | 784 → 784at most +1 | +15.8 |
| /958868 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC | 35 minutes | 464 → 582at least +117 | 784 → 784at most +1 | +18.1 |
| /958868 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC | 30 minutes | 582 → 672at least +89 | 784 → 784at most +1 | +13.8 |
| /958868 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC | 45 minutes | 901 → 1,090at least +179 | 784 → 785at most +2 | +27.8 |
| /959719 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,690 → 3,030at least +1,330 | 681 → 681at most +1 | +206.3 |
| /959719 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC | 35 minutes | 3,030 → 6,340at least +3,300 | 681 → 681at most +1 | +511.9 |
| /959719 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC | 30 minutes | 6,340 → 7,680at least +1,330 | 681 → 681at most +1 | +206.3 |
| /959719 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC | 35 minutes | 7,680 → 9,380at least +1,690 | 681 → 681at most +1 | +262.2 |
| /959729 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,680 → 3,510at least +1,820 | 583 → 583at most +1 | +282.3 |
| /959729 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC | 35 minutes | 3,510 → 5,980at least +2,460 | 583 → 583at most +1 | +381.6 |
| /959729 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC | 30 minutes | 5,980 → 7,340at least +1,350 | 583 → 583at most +1 | +209.4 |
| /959729 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC | 35 minutes | 7,340 → 9,000at least +1,650 | 583 → 583at most +1 | +256.0 |
| /959739 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,690 → 3,810at least +2,110 | 595 → 595at most +1 | +327.3 |
| /959739 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC | 35 minutes | 3,810 → 6,240at least +2,420 | 595 → 595at most +1 | +375.4 |
| /959739 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC | 30 minutes | 6,240 → 7,380at least +1,130 | 595 → 595at most +1 | +175.3 |
| /959739 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC | 35 minutes | 7,380 → 9,060at least +1,670 | 595 → 595at most +1 | +259.1 |
| /959749 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,520 → 2,800at least +1,270 | 621 → 621at most +1 | +197.0 |
| /959749 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC | 35 minutes | 2,800 → 6,170at least +3,360 | 621 → 621at most +1 | +521.2 |
| /959749 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC | 30 minutes | 6,170 → 7,320at least +1,140 | 621 → 621at most +1 | +176.8 |
| /959749 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC | 35 minutes | 7,320 → 9,020at least +1,690 | 621 → 621at most +1 | +262.2 |
| /959759 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,570 → 2,860at least +1,280 | 586 → 586at most +1 | +198.6 |
| /959759 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC | 35 minutes | 2,860 → 6,160at least +3,290 | 586 → 586at most +1 | +510.4 |
| /959759 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC | 30 minutes | 6,160 → 7,360at least +1,190 | 586 → 586at most +1 | +184.6 |
| /959759 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC | 35 minutes | 7,360 → 9,050at least +1,680 | 586 → 586at most +1 | +260.6 |
| /959769 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,540 → 2,810at least +1,260 | 574 → 574at most +1 | +195.5 |
| /959769 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 2,810 → 6,180at least +3,360 | 574 → 574at most +1 | +521.2 |
| /959769 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 6,180 → 7,400at least +1,210 | 574 → 574at most +1 | +187.7 |
| /959769 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 7,400 → 9,090at least +1,680 | 574 → 574at most +1 | +260.6 |
| /959779 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 1,680 → 2,960at least +1,270 | 664 → 664at most +1 | +197.0 |
| /959779 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 2,960 → 6,330at least +3,360 | 664 → 664at most +1 | +521.2 |
| /959779 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 30 minutes | 6,330 → 7,590at least +1,250 | 664 → 664at most +1 | +193.9 |
| /959779 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC | 35 minutes | 7,590 → 9,290at least +1,690 | 664 → 664at most +1 | +262.2 |
Expectedis the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say.It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 1,095,484 | -251 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 1,095,735 | +470 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 1,095,265 | -1,492 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 1,096,757 | -539 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,097,296 | -1,530 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 1,098,826 | -454 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 1,099,280 | -775 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 1,100,055 | -587 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 1,100,642 | -1,182 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,101,824 | -753 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 1,102,577 | -637 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 1,103,214 | -124 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 1,103,338 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 1,103,338 | first reading |
320 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 320 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,605,615 |
| Reactions total | 214,444 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 303 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (10 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 180of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 69 minutes of being posted; a typical post has already reached 58.0% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 89.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 4,300 views — 0.393% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 9,383).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /9618212 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC | 12 minutes – 2 minutes old | 70 views1 reaction | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /9618112 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC | 134 minutes – 34 minutes old | 782 views319 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /9618012 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC | 135 minutes – 35 minutes old | 789 views342 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /9617912 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC | 210 minutes – 45 minutes old | 818 views314 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 14 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /9617712 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC | 519 minutes – 2.6 hours old | 1,620 views ~315 reactions | 60 minutes: 898 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /9617612 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC | 831 minutes – 4.4 hours old | 8,830 views ~677 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,200 → 3.0 hours: 8,264 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /9617512 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC | 911 minutes – 4.6 hours old | 8,290 views ~665 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,260 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,670still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /9617412 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC | 1328 minutes – 6.6 hours old | 9,940 views ~627 reactions | 60 minutes: 974 → 3.0 hours: 2,768 interp. → 6.0 hours: 9,920still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 3.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
214,444 reactions across 318 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119,241 | 55.6% | |
| 🔥 | 17,899 | 8.35% | |
| 🎉 | 17,823 | 8.31% | |
| 🤩 | 17,810 | 8.31% | |
| 👍 | 17,712 | 8.26% | |
| 🥰 | 6,017 | 2.81% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6,008 | 2.80% | |
| 💯 | 5,958 | 2.78% | |
| 😍 | 5,929 | 2.76% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 0.007% | |
| custom 6032921049207676796 | 9 | 0.004% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 0.003% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.001% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.001% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.001% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.001% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.001% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 0.001% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.001% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 318 of the 320 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214,444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 320 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪙REGVK
custom 60329210492076767961
🪙86MUK
❤198🤩35🔥30👍29🎉26🙈1
(\_/) ( ٠.٠) /›👍🔺🔺🔺🔺 👍
❤214🎉43👍32🔥32🤩21
HS Family 💯💯💯👌👌👌 Exactly...... Hard work 💪. Not guess . Trust.... Full trust 💯💯 Odd 6.6 Usually in the last minutes.
❤192🎉39👍30🤩26🔥25custom 60329210492076767962
HS Family .....👌👌👌👌💯 Odd 10 perfect 👌😉😉😉
❤196🔥34🎉31🤩27👍26custom 60329210492076767961
🔝كنثقبوا الشركة غير ب العقل 😏 و الخلاص في اقرب وقت وجيز 🔝💯 ❤️🔥👍😍 Congratulations 🎉🍸🤑 رابط تسجيل في موقع LINEBET 🪙: https://lb-aff.com/L?tag=d_2116019m_22611c_site&site=2116019&ad=22611&r=registration 😱 Code Promo🫡 : HSBET
❤392🤩61🎉51🔥51👍42💯24😍21🥰18
سلام عليكم 👋 الناس اللي باغيين يربحوا في عجلة الحظ 💸 و يستافدوا من المستويات في الشحن و السحب 🔼📊 كاين بروموكود خاص بالقناة 🎁 إلى تسجّلتو بيه، كتاخدو بونيس 250$ فأول إيداع 🚀 و كتستافد من التسجيل إلى دخول VIP فرصة ما خاصهاش تضيع! ➕➕➕➕➕➕➕➕➕ للتسجيل فالموقعين 🖥 🟢 https://linebet.fit/HSBET 🔥 https://sportxpari.com/?promocode=hsbet 🚀 https://refpakrtsb.top/L?tag=ûd_2594427m_45415c_&site=2594427&ad=45415&r=registration…
❤367🔥59🎉52🤩43👍42😍33🥰26❤🔥22
🤑🍸
❤365🎉61🤩56👍45🔥43💯18😍15❤🔥12
🔝كنثقبوا الشركة غير ب العقل 😏 و الخلاص في اقرب وقت وجيز 🔝💯 ❤️🔥👍😍 Congratulations 🎉🍸🤑 رابط تسجيل في موقع LINEBET 🪙: https://lb-aff.com/L?tag=d_2116019m_22611c_site&site=2116019&ad=22611&r=registration 😱 Code Promo🫡 : HSBET
❤398🎉87👍83🔥77🤩72😍48❤🔥47🥰29
استرداد
❤529🎉58🔥56👍47🤩45❤🔥27😍23🥰20
التطبيق على اندرويد 💯 حمله اعمله اثبات 🔗 📣قبل الشحن املأ البيانات الشخصية🖥 و الأمنية 🛡 و بعدين اشحن الحساب عشان ينزلك بونيص 🤫
❤533👍56🤩56🎉46🔥46💯22❤🔥19🥰17
بلا تعقيد 💬💬💬 بونيس يوصل حتى 230% 🤩🔥 إيداع وسحب بسرعة خيالية أقل من 5 دقايق ⚡️✅ وكاش باك كل بداية الأسبوع 🤯💵 كل هادشي مجتمع فـ 3 منصاة و لي فسوق بقوة و كتعتبر حطمت🚀 💪🔥 🟢 🚀🔥🔥 كلشي واضح وسهل 🤝⬇️ سجّل من هنا 🌐🔥 💵💵💵💵💵⬇️ 🟢 🔥 🚀 المنصات الأقوى والأكثر أماناً. MELBET.COM LINEBET.COM XPARIBET.COM اختار GET BONUS وكمل التسجيل ديالك ✅ استعمل كود 🎁 HSBET 🎁 ⚠️ متنساش: الكود هو المفتاح باش تاخذ البونيس والهدايا كاملة 🎁🔥 فرصة م
❤363🎉67👍55🤩48🔥41💯20😍19❤🔥15
Showing the 12 most recent of 320 posts we hold for @hsbet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توقعات كرة القدم - HSBET” (@hsbet), 1,095,484 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hsbet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.